SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Business and Management Studies: An International Journal / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

MEDIATING EFFECT OF WORK ENGAGEMENT IN THE RELATIONSHIP OF PROACTIVE PERSONALITY AND PROACTIVE WORK BEHAVIOR

PROAKTİF KİŞİLİK İLE PROAKTİF ÇALIŞMA DAVRANIŞI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE İŞE GÖNÜLDEN ADANMANIN ARACI ETKİSİ

Ahmet Ferda ÇAKMAK
İlknur UNCUOĞLU YOLCU
Pages
76–96
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As result, it is reviled that proactive personality and proactive work behavior has a positive relationship, moreover, work engagement has a mediating effect on this relationship

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the effects of proactive personality traits on the proactive work behavior and work engagement are examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In line with this aim, data from 151 people work ing in Development Agencies were collected by the questionnaire method and these data were analyzed by hierarchical regression method in order to de termine the direct and regulatory effects of the variables included in the model.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As result, it is reviled that proactive personality and proactive work behavior has a positive relationship, moreover, work engagement has a mediating effect on this relationship
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the effects of proactive personality traits on the proactive work behavior and work engagement are examined. The study aims to examine whether proactive personality structure of employees work ing for Development Agencies in Turk ey has any effect on proactive work behavior, work engagement of people. In line with this aim, data from 151 people work ing in Development Agencies were collected by the questionnaire method and these data were analyzed by hierarchical regression method in order to de termine the direct and regulatory effects of the variables included in the model. As result, it is reviled that proactive personality and proactive work behavior has a positive relationship, moreover, work engagement has a mediating effect on this relationship

Özet

Bu çalışmada proaktif kişilik özelliklerinin proaktif çalışma davranışı ve işe gönülden adanma üzerindeki etkisi incelenmektedir. Çalışmanın amacı Türkiye'deki Kalkınma Ajanslarında görev yapmakta olan personelin proaktif kişilik yapılarının kişilerin proaktif çalışma davranışı göstermelerindeki etkisinde işe gönülden adanmanın anlamlı bir rolü olup olmadığını belirlemektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda Kalkınma Ajansları'nda çalışan 151 kişiden veriler anket yöntemi ile toplanmış ve bu veriler oluşturulan modelde yer alan değişkenlerin doğrudan ve aracı etkilerini belirlemek amacıyla hiyerarşik regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda proaktif kişiliğin proaktif çalışma davranışı ile pozitif yönlü bir ilişki içerisinde olduğu; işe gönülden adanmanın bu ilişkide önemli bir aracı etkisine sahip olduğu ortaya konulmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKMAK, A. F., YOLCU, İ. U. (2017). MEDIATING EFFECT OF WORK ENGAGEMENT IN THE RELATIONSHIP OF PROACTIVE PERSONALITY AND PROACTIVE WORK BEHAVIOR. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 76–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/201409

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ashford, S. J. ve Cummings, L. L. (1985). Proactive Feedback Seeking: The Instrumental Use of the Information Environment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58, 67-79.
  2. Ashford, S. J. ve Black, J. S. (1996). Proactivity During Organizational Entry: The Role of Desire for Control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(2), 199-214.
  3. Bakker, A. B., Tims, M. ve Derks, D. (2012). Proactive Personality and Job Performance: The Role of Job Crafting and Work Engagement. Human Relations, 65(10), 1359-1378.
  4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought And Action. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Baron, R. M., ve Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6): 1173-1182.
  5. Bateman, Thomas ve Crant, J.Michael (1993). The Proactive Component of Organizational Behavior: A Measure and Correlates Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14: 103-118.
  6. Bateman, T. S., ve Crant, J. M. (1999). Proactive behavior: Meaning, impact, recommendations. Business Horizons, 42(3), 63-70.
  7. Bolino, M.C., Valcea, S., ve Harvey, J. (2010). Employee, manage thyself: The potentially-negative implications of expecting employees to behave proactively Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83: 325-345.
  8. Brown, D. J., Cober, R. T., Kane, K., Levy, P. E., ve Shalhoop, J. (2006). Proactive personality and the successful job search: a field investigation with college graduates. Journal of applied psychology, 91(3), 717-726.
  9. Buss, D. M. (1987). Selection, evocation, and manipulation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 53(6), 1214-1221.
  10. Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of management, 26(3), 435-462.
  11. Crant, J. M., ve Bateman, T. S. (2000). Charismatic leadership viewed from above: The impact of proactive personality. Journal of organizational Behavior, 63-75.
  12. Çelik, H. E., ve Yılmaz, V. (2013). Lisrel 9.1 ile Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi: Temel Kavramlar-Uygulamala rProgramlama (Yenilenmiş 2. Baskı). Ankara:
  13. Anı Yayıncılık. Dikkers, J. S., Jansen, P. G., de Lange, A. H., Vinkenburg, C. J., ve Kooij, D. (2010). Proactivity, job characteristics, and engagement: a longitudinal study. Career Development International, 15(1), 59-77.
  14. Drown, D. T. (2013). Work Design Characteristics as Moderators of the Relationship between Proactive Personality and Engagement. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Po