Journals / Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

DETERMINING THE FACTORS AFFECTING THE TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONAL SILENCE WITH STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING

ÖRGÜTSEL SESSİZLİK TÜRLERİNİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLERİN YAPISAL EŞİTLİK MODELİ İLE BELİRLENMESİ 1

Pages
123–146
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Internal locus of control has a moderator effect on the relationship between acquiescent silence with perceived organizational support and defensive silence with job satisfaction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to analyze how the types of organizational silence are affected by the perceived organizational support, management openness and job satisfaction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, empirical evidence has gathered from 894 academic and office personnel from Bartin, Bulent Ecevit and Karabuk Universities.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Internal locus of control has a moderator effect on the relationship between acquiescent silence with perceived organizational support and defensive silence with job satisfaction.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze how the types of organizational silence are affected by the perceived organizational support, management openness and job satisfaction. For this purpose, empirical evidence has gathered from 894 academic and office personnel from Bartin, Bulent Ecevit and Karabuk Universities. It has been determined that perceived organizational silence has a significant effect on acquiescent silence and job satisfaction has a significant effect on prosocial silence. Perceived organizational support, management openness and job satisfaction have a significant effect on defensive silence. Internal locus of control has a moderator effect on the relationship between acquiescent silence with perceived organizational support and defensive silence with job satisfaction.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, örgütsel sessizlik türlerinin algılanan örgütsel destek, yönetimin açıklığı ve iş tatmini değişkenleri tarafından nasıl etkilendiğini analiz etmektir. Bartın, Bülent Ecevit ve Karabük Üniversitelerinde hizmet sunmakta olan 894 adet akademik ve idari personel üzerinde gerçekleştirilen çalışma sonuçlarına göre; algılanan örgütsel desteğin kabullenici sessizlik üzerinde ve iş tatminin prososyal sessizlik üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisinin olduğu belirlenmiştir. Savunmacı sessizlik üzerinde ise algılanan örgütsel destek, yönetimin açıklığı ve iş tatminin anlamlı bir etkisi bulunmaktadır. İçsel kontrol odağı, kabullenici sessizlikle algılanan örgütsel destek ve savunmacı sessizlikle iş tatmini arasındaki ilişkide düzenleyici bir etkiye sahiptir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KULUALP, H. G., ÇAKMAK, A. F. (2022). DETERMINING THE FACTORS AFFECTING THE TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONAL SILENCE WITH STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 123–146. https://ajindex.com/articles/499602

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aiken, L. S.,& West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. California, USA: Sage Publications. Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu S.,& Engin Yıldırım (2012). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri SPSS Uygulamalı. 7. Baskı, İstanbul:
  2. Sakarya Yayınları.
  3. Amah, O.E.,& Okafor, C. A. (2010).
  4. Relationships Among Silence Climate, Employee Silence Behaviour and Work Attitudes: The Role of Self-Esteem and Locus of Control. Asian Journal of Scientific Research. 3 (4), 267-277.
  5. Angı, A. (2002). A Comprehensive Study Concerning The Job Satisfaction of the Instructors Associated with Students' Evaluation. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Marmara Üniverstesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Ashford, S., Rothbard, N. P., Piderit, S. K.,& Dutton, J. E. (1998). Out on a Limb: The Role of Context and Impression Management in Selling Gender-Equity Issues, Administrative Science Quarterly. 43(1), 23-57.
  6. Baron, R.M.,& Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 51(6), 1173-1182.
  7. Bayram, N. (2009). Sosyal Bilimlerde SPSS ile Veri Analizi. Bayram, N. (2010). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş: AMOS Uygulamaları. Bursa: Ezgi Kitapevi. Blackman, D.,& Sadler-Smith E. (2009). The Silent and Silenced in Organizational Knowing and Learning. Management Learning. 40, 569-585.
  8. Blau, G. J. (1987). Locus of Control as A Potential Moderator of the Turnover Process. Journal of Occupational Psychology. 60, 21-29.
  9. Bogosian, R. (2012). Engaging Organizational Voice: A Phenomenological Study of Employees' Lived Experiences of Silence in Work Group Settings. Yayımlanmış Doktora Tezi. The Faculty of Graduate School of Education and Human Development of the George Washington University. Bouradas, D.,& Vakola M. (2003). Organizational Silence: A New Challenge For Human Resources. Paper of HR Conference. Economics and Business Faculty of Athens University. Bowen, F.,& Blackmon K. (2003). Spirals of Silence: The Dynamic Effects of Diversity on Organizational Voice. Journal of Management Studies, 40 (6), 1393-1417.
  10. Brinsfield, C. T. (2009). Employee Silence: Investigation of Dimensionality, Development of Measures, and Examination of Related Factors. Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The Ohio State University. Brinsfield, C. T., Edwards M. S.,& Greenberg J. (2009). Voice and Silence in Organizations: Historical Review a