Journals / KBB-Forum / 2008 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

The influence of lidocain infiltration on pain during remowal of nasal packing after septoplasty

Septoplasti sonrası tampon çekilmesi esnasında tampon içine lidokain infiltrasyonunun oluşan ağrı üzerine etkisi

Journal
KBB-Forum
Pages
6–8
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Nasal package rehydratation with %4 lidocain 15 minutes before removal is a simple, safe and a cheap process which provides important contribution to patients comfort during removal of nasal package after septoplasty.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of the rehydration of nasal package with 4% lidocaine to the pain during removal of these packages.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Before removing, one of the packages was rehydrated with 5 ml of % 4 lidocaine and the other one with % 0,9 NaCl.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Nasal package rehydratation with %4 lidocain 15 minutes before removal is a simple, safe and a cheap process which provides important contribution to patients comfort during removal of nasal package after septoplasty.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of the rehydration of nasal package with 4% lidocaine to the pain during removal of these packages. One hundred patients who underwent septoplasty are included in this prospective, randomized and placebo controlled study. Same type of merocel package is applied to all patients. Before removing, one of the packages was rehydrated with 5 ml of % 4 lidocaine and the other one with % 0,9 NaCl. While the first 50 patients' (group 1) nasal packages were removed 10 minutes after rehydratation, the second 50 patients' (group 2) packages were removed 15 minutes after rehydratation. All patients were requested to mark their pain levels during removal on a visual analog scale. The data obtained from the patients are compared statistically. Although the decrease in the pain level was not statistically significant in the first group (p= 0.412), it was statistically significant in the second group (p= 0.024). Nasal package rehydratation with %4 lidocain 15 minutes before removal is a simple, safe and a cheap process which provides important contribution to patients comfort during removal of nasal package after septoplasty.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı septoplasti sonrası tampon çekilirken meydana gelen ağrıya, nazal tamponlara uygulanan %4'lük lidokain rehidrasyonunun etkisini araştırmaktır. Prospektif, randomize, plesebo kontollü olarak planlanan çalışmaya, sadece septoplasti ameliyatı uygulanmış 100 hasta dahil edildi. Operasyon sonrası tüm hastalara aynı tip merocel tampon kullanıldı. Tamponların çekilme işleminden önce hastaların bir nazal pasajındaki tampon 5 ml %4 lidokain ile diğer nazal pasajındaki tampon ise %0,9'luk serum fizyolojik ile rehidrate edildi. Çalışmanın birinci grubundaki 50 hastanın tamponları rehidratasyondan 10 dakika, ikinci gruptaki 50 hastanın ise 15 dakika sonra çekildi. Tüm hastalardan, tampon çekilmesi sırasında oluşan ağrı şiddetini vizüel analog skala ile değerlendirmesi istendi ve elde edilen veriler istatistiksel olarak karşılaştırıldı. Birinci grupta ağrı şiddetindeki azalma istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değilken (p= 0.412) ikinci gruptaki azalma istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu (p= 0.024). Septoplasti sonrası tamponların çıkarılmadan 15 dakika önce %4 lidokainle rehidratasyonu basit, güvenilir ve ucuz bir işlem olup septoplasti uygulanan hastaların konforuna önemli katkılar sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, Y. F., ÖZLÜGEDİK, S., TİTİZ, A., TUNCAY, A., ÜNAL, A. (2008). The influence of lidocain infiltration on pain during remowal of nasal packing after septoplasty. KBB-Forum, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 6–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/201163

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Laing MR, Clark LJ. Analgesia and removal of nasal packing. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1990; 15: 339- 342 [ Özet ] 2) Hwang JH, Liu CM, Liu TC, Hsu MC. Sphenopalatine ganglion block before removal of nasal packing. Laryngoscope 2003; 113: 1423- 1424 [ Özet ] 3) Kuo MJ, Zeitoun H, Macnamara M, Wagstaff K, Carlin WV, Turner N. The use of topical % 5 lignocaine ointment for the relief of pain associated with post-operative nasal packing. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1995; 20: 357- 359 [ Özet ] 4) Lavy JA, Small GV, Jay N, Radcliffe GJ. A prospective randomized controlled study of %4 lignocaine solution in merocel nasal pack removal. Rhinology 1996; 34: 219- 221 [ Özet ] 5) Durvasula VS, Brewis C, Syeda F, Leong P. Lignocaine as a topical analgesia for post-operative nasal pack removal: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. J Laryngol Otol 2005; 119: 348- 351 [ Özet ] 6) Lachanas VA, Karatzias GT, Pinakas VG, Hatziioannou JK, Sandris VG. The use of tetracaine 0.25% solution in nasal packing removal. Am J Rhinol 2006; 20: 483- 484 [ Özet ] 7) Chuang LH, Yeung L, Ku WC, Yang KJ, Lai CC. Safety and efficacy of topical anesthesia combined with a lower concentration of intracameral lidocaine in phacoemulsification: Paired human eye study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 293- 296 [ Özet ] 8) Di Donato A, Fontana C, Lancia F, Di Giorgio K, Reali S, Caricati A. Levobupivacaine 0.75% vs. lidocaine 4% for topical anaesthesia: a clinical comparison in cataract surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2007; 24: 438- 440 [ Özet ] 9) Soliman MM, Macky TA, Samir MK. Comparative clinical trial of topical anesthetic agents in cataract surgery: lidocaine 2% gel, bupivacaine 0.5% drops, and benoxinate 0.4% drops. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 1716- 1720 [ Özet ]