Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3

The evaluation of etiological factors in urticaria

Urtikaryalı olgularda etyolojik etkenlerin saptanması

Pages
159–163
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In this study, the im¬portance of a detailed history re¬garding triggering factors such as infections, drugs and foods in the evaluation of patients with urticaria was emphasized.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Urticaria is a common skin disease which is easily diag¬nosed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and method: In this retrospective study; 127 in-patients with urticaria who were followed up in Dokuz Eylül University Medical School Department of Dermatology between the years 2000-2007 were re-evaluated to outline the estab¬lished etiologic factors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In this study, the im¬portance of a detailed history re¬garding triggering factors such as infections, drugs and foods in the evaluation of patients with urticaria was emphasized.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000-2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Aşırı duyarlılık · erken · Geriyedönük çalışma

Abstract

Objective: Urticaria is a common skin disease which is easily diag¬nosed. In contrast to the ease of its diagnosis, the underlying etiologic factors are often difficult to deter¬mine. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the etiologic fac¬tors in patients with urticaria who were followed-up by our clinic. Material and method: In this retrospective study; 127 in-patients with urticaria who were followed up in Dokuz Eylül University Medical School Department of Dermatology between the years 2000-2007 were re-evaluated to outline the estab¬lished etiologic factors. Results: Detailed anamnesis and laboratory investigations revealed at least one etiological factor in 92 (72.4%) patients, especially foods, drugs and infections. On the other hand 35 (27.6%) patients had no associating triggering factors. Conclusion: In this study, the im¬portance of a detailed history re¬garding triggering factors such as infections, drugs and foods in the evaluation of patients with urticaria was emphasized.

Özet

kliniğimizde urtikarya tanısıyla izlenmiş olan hastalarda saptanan etyolojik faktörlerin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve yöntem: Bu retrospektif çalışmada 2000-2007 yılları arasında Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dermatoloji Kliniği’nde yatarak tedavi gören urtikarya tanısı almış 127 olguda saptanan etyolojik etmenler araştırılmıştır. Bulgular: Ayrıntılı anamnez ve etyolojiye yönelik yapılan tetkikler sonucunda özellikle gıdalar, ilaçlar ve infeksiyonlar olmak üzere 92 (%72,4) hastada en az 1 veya daha fazla olası tetikleyici etken saptanır¬ken, 35 (%27,6) hastada tetikleyici etken saptanamamıştır. Sonuç: Çalışmada elde edilen bulgular ışığında; urtikaryalı olguların değerlendi-rilmesinde infeksiyonlar, ilaçlar ve gıdalar başta olmak üzere olası tetikleyici faktörlerin alınacak ayrıntılı anamnezde yer almasının önemi vurgulanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KUŞKU, E., AKBAŞ, Ö., SELÇUK, P., GÖNEN, F., ERDEM, D., ÖZKAN, Ş. (2007). The evaluation of etiological factors in urticaria. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 159–163. https://ajindex.com/articles/200126

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Braun-Falco O, Plewig G, Wolff HH et al. Dermatology. Second edition. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2000; 431-456
  2. Cooper KD, Arbor A. Urticaria and angioedema: diagno-sis and evaluation. J Am Acad Dermatol 1991;25:166-174
  3. Lipozencic J, Wolf R. Life-threatening severe allergic reactions: urticaria, angioedema, and anaphylaxis. Clin Dermatol 2005; 23: 193-205
  4. Greaves MW, Salvoe RA. ABC of allergies: allergy and the skin. I-Urticaria. BMJ 1998; 316: 1147- 1150
  5. Schocket AL. Chronic urticaria: pathophysiology and etio-logy, or the what and why. Allergy Asthma Proc 2006; 27: 90–95
  6. Muller BA. Urticaria and angioedema: a practical appro-ach. Am Fam Physician 2004; 69: 1123-1128
  7. Klemens JC, Tripathi A. Urticaria and angioedema. Allergy Asthma Proc 2004; 25: 43-46
  8. Guldbakke KK, Khachemoune A. Etiology, classification and treatment of urticaria.Cutis 2007;79: 41-49
  9. Kaplan AP. Urticaria and angioedema. In: Middleton E, Reed CE, Ellis EF et al, editors. Allergy. 5 th ed. St Louis Mosby, 1998;1104-1122
  10. Wedi B, Raap U, Kapp A. Chronic urticaria and infec-tions.Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2004;387-396
  11. Kozel MMA, Sabroe RA. Chronic urticaria. aetiology, management and current and future treatment options. Drugs 2004; 64: 2515-2536
  12. Dreskin SC, Andrews KY. The thyroid and urticaria.Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2005;5:408-412
  13. Grattan CEH, Sabroe RA, Greaves MW. Chronic urticaria. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002;46:645-657
  14. Kaplan AP. Chronic urticaria: pathogenesis and treat-ment. J Allergy Clin Immnol 2004; 114; 465-74
  15. Sakurai M, Oba M, Matsumoto K, et al. Acute infectious urticaria: clinical and laboratory analysis in nineteen patients. J Dermatol 2000;27:87-93
  16. Sackesen C, Sekerel BE, Orhan F,et al. The etiology of different forms of urticaria in chidhood. Pediatr Dermatol 2004;21:102-108.