Journals / Aquatic Research / 2018 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 4

ACOUSTIC NOISE POLLUTION FROM MARINE INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITIES: EXPOSURE AND IMPACTS

Pages
148–161
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore the potential effects of various sound sources derived from marine industrial activities have been reviewed in this study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The improvements in marine technological developments propagate urbanization in the ocean environment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With the increase of urbanization and progressive development of marine industries, more and more pressure from human-generated (anthropogenic) underwater sound pollution may threaten marine mammals, fish species and invertebrates from underwater noises that in terms might be called as “Underwater Noise Pollution”.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore the potential effects of various sound sources derived from marine industrial activities have been reviewed in this study.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The improvements in marine technological developments propagate urbanization in the ocean environment. The construction or operational activities of marine structures such as energy plants, oil platforms, pipe-lines, sea-tunnel passages, or cable-stayed suspension bridges, and vessel traffic are sources of underwater noise pollution. How underwater sounds such as piling, pole drilling, or machinery noises may affect the marine live is mostly ignored in marine construction, and there is lack of information regarding underwater sound effects on marine live in the oceans. Recently, a remarkable interest is developing concerning underwater sound effects, especially in aquaculture facilities, with experimentation of musical stimuli or various noises caused by pumps or filter systems on behavior and stress responses of fish in culture conditions. With the increase of urbanization and progressive development of marine industries, more and more pressure from human-generated (anthropogenic) underwater sound pollution may threaten marine mammals, fish species and invertebrates from underwater noises that in terms might be called as “Underwater Noise Pollution”. The future of marine life and that of human being, and the dramatic increase of underwater sound pollution is a new debate that needs to be controlled in a sustainable way with environmentsound approaches. Therefore the potential effects of various sound sources derived from marine industrial activities have been reviewed in this study.

🔖

Cite This Article

KUŞKU, H., YİĞİT, M., ERGÜN, S., YİĞİT, Ü., TAYLOR, N. (2018). ACOUSTIC NOISE POLLUTION FROM MARINE INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITIES: EXPOSURE AND IMPACTS. Aquatic Research, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 4, 148–161. https://ajindex.com/articles/148080

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. André, M., Solé, M., Lenoir, M., Durfort, M., Quero, C., Mas, A., Lombarte, A., van der Shaar, M., LópezBejar, M., Morell M., Zaugg S., Houégnian, L. (2011). Low-frequency sounds induce acoustic trauma in cephalopods. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10, 18-28.
  2. Andrew, R.K., Howe, B.M., Mercer, J.A. (2002). Ocean ambient sound: Comparing the 1960s with the 1990s for a receiver off the California coast. Acoustics Research Letters Online, 3, 65-70.
  3. Bart, A., Clark, J., Young, J., Zohar, Y. (2001). Underwater ambient noise measurements in aquaculture systems: a survey. Aquacultural Engineering, 25(2), 99-110.
  4. Barton, B.A., Schreck, C.B., Fowler, L.G. (1988). Fasting and diet content affect stress-induced changes in plasma glucose and cortisol in juvenile Chinook salmon. Progressive Fish-Culturist, 50, 16-22.
  5. Bailey, H., Senior, B., Simmons, D., Rusin, J., Picken, G., Thompson, P.M. (2010). Assessing underwater noise levels during pile-driving at an offshore windfarm and its potential effects on marine mammals. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 60, 888-897.
  6. Blackwell, S.B., Lawson, J.W., Williams, J.T. (2004). Tolerance by ringed seals (Phoca hispida) to impact pipedriving and construction sounds at an oil production island. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 2346-2357.
  7. Byron, C., Costa-Pierce, B.A. (2010). Carrying capacity tools for use in the implementation of an ecosystems approach to aquaculture. Site selection and carrying capacity for inland and coastal aquaculture, 87-101.
  8. Byron, C., Bengtson, D., Costa-Pierce, B., Calanni, J. (2011). Integrating science into management: ecological carrying capacity of bivalve shellfish aquaculture. Marine Policy 35, 363–370.
  9. Catli, T., Yildirim, O., Turker, A. (2015). The Effect of Different Tempos of Music During Feeding, on Growth Performance, Chemical Body Composition, and Feed Utilization of Turbot (Psetta maeotica, Pallas 1814). The Israeli Journal of Aquaculture - Bamidgeh, IJA_67.2015.1221. Chen, F., Shapiro, G.I., Bennett, K.A., Ingram, S.N., Thompson, D., Vincent, C., Russell, D.J.F., Embling, C.B. (2017). Shipping noise in a dynamic sea: a case study of grey seals in the Celtic Sea. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 114, 372-383.
  10. Clark, J., Young, J., Bart, A., Zohar, Y. (1996). Underwater ambient noise measurements. 30th Proceedings of the Acoustical Society of America. St. Louis, MO, November, 27, 13. Clement, T.S., Parikh, V., Schrumpf, M., Fernald, R.D. (2005). Behavioral coping strategies in