Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2017 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3

ANALYSIS OF ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMIES: EVALUATION OF 338 CASES

Pages
159–162
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Anterior cervical discectomy + fusion or total disc replacement can be performed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of our study is to analyse the cervical discectomy operations performed in our clinic in the last 3 years.Materials and Method: 338 patients underwent anterior cervical discectomy+fusion or total disc replacement at Adana Numune Training and Research Hospital Neurosurgery Clinic between April 2013 and April 2016 were inspected retrospectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We evaluated patients' age, gender, level of discopathy, side of the disc herniation, type of surgery, preoperative and postoperative Visual Analog Scale(VAS) scores.Results: Data from 338 patients were included in the statistical analyses.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Anterior cervical discectomy + fusion or total disc replacement can be performed.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of our study is to analyse the cervical discectomy operations performed in our clinic in the last 3 years.Materials and Method: 338 patients underwent anterior cervical discectomy+fusion or total disc replacement at Adana Numune Training and Research Hospital Neurosurgery Clinic between April 2013 and April 2016 were inspected retrospectively. We evaluated patients' age, gender, level of discopathy, side of the disc herniation, type of surgery, preoperative and postoperative Visual Analog Scale(VAS) scores.Results: Data from 338 patients were included in the statistical analyses. Mean age of the study population was 46.1 ± 10.3 years, and male/female ratio was 171 / 167. 145 patients(42.9 %) had a localization at C5-C6. The symptoms were on the left side of 43,5 % of patients. Total disc replacement implanted on 203 patients (60.1 %) and 135 patients(39.9 %) had been operated with fusion cages with blade. VAS scores decreased significantly during follow-up period. The comparisons of clinical characteristics between males and females were similar. But postoperative 3rd month VAS scores were significantly different between genders, and males had lower VAS scores than females.Conclusion: Cervical disc disease is a common pathology. Anterior cervical discectomy is a frequently performed procedure in surgical treatment. Anterior cervical discectomy + fusion or total disc replacement can be performed.

🔖

Cite This Article

İŞTEMEN, İ., AFŞER, K. A., AÇIK, V., ÇAVUŞ, G., SARI, E. B., GEZERCAN, Y., ÖKTEN, A. İ. (2017). ANALYSIS OF ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMIES: EVALUATION OF 338 CASES. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3, 159–162. https://ajindex.com/articles/199946

References (10)

  1. Aydoğmuş E, Gül A, Gür E, Kaya E, Tiryaki M, Süslü HT. Anterior cervical discectomy:Analysis of the results of two years. JTSS 2016; 27(3): 143-146
  2. Blumenthal SL, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD, Zigler JE. Reoperations in cervical totaldisc replacement compared with anterior cervical fusion: results compiled from multiple prospective food and drug administration investigational device exemption trials conducted at a single site. Spine 2013; 38(14): 1177-1182 3. Conelly PJ, Esses SI, Kostuik JP. Anterior cervical fusion: outcome analysis of patients fused with and without anterior cervical plates. J Spinal Disord. 1996; 9(3): 202- 206
  3. Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, et al. Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacentlevel intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 2002; 27: 2431-2434
  4. Grob D. Surgery in the degenerative cervical spine. Spine 1998; 23: 2674-2683 6. Heidecke V, Burkert W, Brucke M, Rainov NG. Intervertebral disc replacement for cervical degenerative disease--clinical results and functional outcome at two years in patients implanted with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Acta Neurochir(Wien) 2008; 150(5): 453-459
  5. Lehto IJ, Tertii MO, Komu ME, Paajanen HE, Tuominen J, Kormanu MJ. Age-related MRI changes at 0.1 T in cervical discs in asymptomatic subjects. Neuroradiology 1994: 36(1): 49-53
  6. Leung C, Casey AT, Goffin J, Kehr P, Liebig K, Lind B, Logroscino C, Pointillart V. Clinical significance of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc replacement: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Neurosurgery 2005; 57(4): 759-763
  7. Matsumoto M, Fujimura Y, Suzuki N, Nishi Y, Nakamura M, Yabe Y, Shiga H. MRI of cervical intervertebral discs in asymptomatic subjects J Bone Joint Surg 1998; 80-B(1): 19-24 10. Moreland DB, Asch HL, Clabeaux DE, Castiglia GJ, Czajka GA, Lewis PJ, Egnatchik JG, Cappuccino A, Huynh L. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with implantable titanium cage: initial impressions, patient outcomes and comparison to fusion with allograft. Spine J 2004; 4(2): 184-191
  8. Parkinson JF, Sekhon LH. Cervical arthroplasty complicated by delayed spontaneous fusion. Case report. J Neurosurg Spine 2005; 2(3): 377-380
  9. Schwab JS, Diangelo DJ, Foley KT. Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go? Spine 2006; 31: 2439-2448
  10. Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebr