Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2014 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

Erciyes Üniversitesi'nde Epizyotomi Oranının Retrospektif Analizi

Retrospective Analysis of Episiotomy Rate in Erciyes University

Pages
10–14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With the increasing experiences and training, the episiotomy ratio can be further decreased in nulliparous women.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to assess the episiotomy rate and perineal outcome in women delivered in 2013-2014.
📊
Key Findings & Data:STUDY DESIGN: Birth data and perineal outcome of women delivering singleton, live- born infant weighting more than 1000 gram in 2013- 2014 in Erciyes University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology were evaluated retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With the increasing experiences and training, the episiotomy ratio can be further decreased in nulliparous women.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013-2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to assess the episiotomy rate and perineal outcome in women delivered in 2013-2014. STUDY DESIGN: Birth data and perineal outcome of women delivering singleton, live- born infant weighting more than 1000 gram in 2013- 2014 in Erciyes University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 580 birth occurred in our clinics in 2013- 2014. The mean maternal age 27.6±6.2 (min- max: 16-46 years), parity 1.17±1.2 (min- max: 0-14), birth weight 3033.1± 610 (min- max: 1070- 4580 gram). The episiotomy rate for whole population was 19.4%. The episiotomy rate for multiparous and nulliparous were 6.1%, and 43.1% respectively. No cases of third and/or fourth degree perineal trauma were detected during the study period. The most common episiotomy indication was unfavorable pelvic examination (n: 35, 31.2%). CONCLUSION: Restrictive episiotomy application does not increase third and fourth degree perineal lacerations. With the increasing experiences and training, the episiotomy ratio can be further decreased in nulliparous women.

Özet

AMAÇ: Bu çalışmanın amacı, 2013-2014 senesinde kliniğimizdeki doğumlarda epizyotomi oranının ve perineal sonuçların incelenmesidir. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Erciyes ÜniversitesiTıp Fakültesi Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Ana Bilim Dalı'nda, 2013-2014 senesinde 1000 gram üzerindeki canlı doğum yapan ve sınırlı epizyo tomi uygulaması yapılan olgularda perineal sonuçlar retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. BULGULAR: 2013-2014 senesinde kliniğimizde toplam 580 doğum gerçekleşti. Ortalama anne yaşı 27,6±6,2 (min- max: 16-46 yıl), parite 1,17±1,2 (min- max: 0-14), doğum ağırlığı 3033,1±610 (min-max: 1070-4580 gram) olarak belirlendi. Tüm popülasyon için epizyotomi oranı %19,4 iken, bu oran multiparlarda %6,1, nulliparlarda %43,1 olarak bulundu. Çalışma süresince üçüncü veya dördüncü derece perine laserasyonu izlenmedi. En sık epizyotomi endikasyonu uygunsuz pelvik muayene olarak belirlendi (n:35, %31,2). SONUÇ: Sınırlı epizyotomi uygulaması üçüncü ve dördüncü derece perine laserasyonu insidansını artırmamaktadır. Artan deneyim ve eğitim ile epizyotomi oranlarının nullipar olgularda daha da düşürülmesi mümkündür.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜTÜK, M. S., DOLANBAY, M., ÖZGÜN, M. T., ÖZDEMİR, F., ÖZTÜRK, A., AYGEN, E. (2014). Erciyes Üniversitesi'nde Epizyotomi Oranının Retrospektif Analizi. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 10–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/199783

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Yanık FF. Episiotomy. T Clin J Gynecol Obst-Special Topics 2008;1:50-4.
  2. Thacker SB, Banta HD. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature, 1860-1980. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1983;38:322-38.
  3. Hartmann K, Viswanathan M, Palmieri R, Gartlehner G, Thorp J Jr, Lohr KN. Outcomes of routine episiotomy: a systematic review. JAMA 2005;293:2141-8.
  4. Fritel X, Schaal JP, Fauconnier A, Bertrand V, Levet C, Pigné A. Pelvic flor disorders four years after first deliv- ery: a comparative study of restrictive versus systematic episiotomy. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2008;36:991-7.
  5. Carroli G, Mignini L. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; 21; CD000081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub2. Review. Karaçam Z, Ekmen H, Calişır H, Seker S. Prevalence of episiotomy in primiparas, related conditions, and effects of episiotomy on suture materials used, perineal pain, wound healing 3 weeks postpartum, in Turkey: A prospec- tive follow-up study. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2013;18:237-45.
  6. Kutuk MS, Ozgun MT, Uludag S,Dolanbay M, Ozdemir F, Aykut G, Ozturk A. Rutin Epizyotomi Uygulamasının Terk Edilmesi: Erciyes Üniversitesi Deneyimi. T Clin J Gynecol Obst 2013;23:154-59.
  7. Fernando R, Sultan AH, Kettle C, Thakar R. Methods of repair for obstetric anal sphincter injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013:Dec 8;12. CD002866. Doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002866.pub3 Maduma-Butshe A, Dyall A, Garner P. Routine epi- siotomy in developing countries. Time to change a harm- ful practice. BMJ 1998;18:1179-80.
  8. Duran EH, Eroğlu D, Sandıkçı N, Arda Lembet A, Bağış T, Zeyneloğlu HB. A Prospective Randomized study on routine use of episiotomy in vaginal deliveries. T Clin J Gynecol Obst 2002;12:16-19
  9. Rodriguez A, Arenas EA, Osorio AL, Mendez O, Zuleta JJ. Selective vs routine midline episiotomy for the pre- vention of third- or fourth-degree lacerations in nulli- parous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:285. Joint Policy Statement on Normal Childbirth.; J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2008;30:1163-5.
  10. Macleod M, Strachan B, Bahl R, Howarth L, Goyder K, Van de Venne M, Murphy DJ. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery. BJOG 2008; 115:1688-94.
  11. Graham ID, Carroli G, Davies C, Medves JM. Episiotomy rates around the world: an update. Birth 2005;32:219-23.
  12. Şahin NH, Yıldırım G, Aslan E. Evaluating the second stage of deliveries in a maternity hospital. T Clin J Gynecol Obs