SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Acta Aquatica Turcica / 2021 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of the Toxicity Activity of Bioactive Compounds of Some Geophytes against Brine Shrimp (Artemia salina L.)

Bazı Geofit Türlerin Biyoaktif Bileşiklerinin Tuzlu Su Karidesi (Artemia salina)'ne Karşı Toksisite Aktivitesinin Değerlendirilmesi

Murat TURAN
Ramazan MAMMADOV
Pages
195–201
Publication Date
2021-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the studies showing that A. salina toxic effect studies are related to insecticide and anticancer studies, it is seen that especially the fresh part of P. kesrouanensis has potential insecticide and anticancer properties, but more studies are needed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Artemia salina L.is an important model organism for the world ecosystem, which is very sensitive, easily available, allows to work in the laboratory environment, is used in toxic effect studies, and gives safe results.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The fresh part of P. kesrouanensis was shown the highest toxic effect with 44.44 ± 2.78% (1.56 ± 0.13 mg/mL, LC50) and the underground part of N. tazetta subsp. tazetta was shown the lowest toxic effect with 8.33 ± 0.00% (294.68 ± 1.54 mg/mL, LC50).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the studies showing that A. salina toxic effect studies are related to insecticide and anticancer studies, it is seen that especially the fresh part of P. kesrouanensis has potential insecticide and anticancer properties, but more studies are needed.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Artemia salina (L.) · Toksik etki · Narcissus tazetta subsp. tazetta

Abstract

Artemia salina L.is an important model organism for the world ecosystem, which is very sensitive, easily available, allows to work in the laboratory environment, is used in toxic effect studies, and gives safe results. This study was designed to evaluate the toxic effect of water extract of fresh and underground parts of some species of five geophyte genera (Arum rupicola var. virescens (Stapf) P.C. Boyce, Cyclamen cilicium Boiss. & Heldr, Gagea bohemica (Zauschn.) Schult. & Schult. f., Narcissus tazetta subsp. tazetta L., Paeonia kesrouanensis J. Thiébaut) against A. salina. All taxa were found to be more toxic in the fresh part than in the underground part. The fresh part of P. kesrouanensis was shown the highest toxic effect with 44.44 ± 2.78% (1.56 ± 0.13 mg/mL, LC50) and the underground part of N. tazetta subsp. tazetta was shown the lowest toxic effect with 8.33 ± 0.00% (294.68 ± 1.54 mg/mL, LC50). The underground part of N. tazetta subsp. tazetta and Gagea bohemica were not found toxic with > 1000 mg/ml, LC90. Based on the studies showing that A. salina toxic effect studies are related to insecticide and anticancer studies, it is seen that especially the fresh part of P. kesrouanensis has potential insecticide and anticancer properties, but more studies are needed.

Özet

Artemia salina L. çok hassas, kolay ulaşılabilir, laboratuvar ortamında in vivo çalışmaya olanak sağlayan, toksik etki çalışmalarında kullanılıp güvenli sonuçlar veren, dünya ekosistemi için önemli bir model organizmadır. Bu çalışma, geofit olan beş cinse ait bazı türlerin (Arum rupicola var. virescens (Stapf) P.C. Boyce, Cyclamen cilicium Boiss. & Heldr, Gagea bohemica (Zauschn.) Schult. & Schult. f., Narcissus tazetta subsp. tazetta L., Paeonia kesrouanensis J. Thiébaut) toprak üstü ve toprak altı kısımlarının su ekstraktının A. salina’ya karşı toksik etkisini değerlendirmek için tasarlanmıştır. Bütün taksonlarda toprak üstü kısım, toprak altı kısıma göre daha toksik olduğu bulunmuştur. P. kesrouanensis’in toprak üstü kısmı 44.44 ± 2.78% (1.56 ± 0.13 mg/mL, LC50) değeri ile en yüksek toksik etkiyi gösterirken N. tazetta subsp. tazetta’nın toprak altı kısmı 8.33 ± 0.00% (294.68 ± 1.54 mg/mL, LC50) değeri ile en düşük toksik etkiyi göstermiştir. N. tazetta subsp. tazetta ve G. bohemica’nın toprak altı kısmı > 1000 mg/ml, LC90 ile toksik bulunmamıştır. A. salina toksik etki çalışmalarının insektisit ve antikanser çalışmaları ile ilgili olduğunu gösteren çalışmalara dayanarak, özellikle P. kesrouanensis'in yer üstü kısmının potansiyel insektisit ve antikanser özelliklere sahip olduğu ancak daha fazla çalışmaya ihtiyaç duyulduğu görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURAN, M., MAMMADOV, R. (2021). Evaluation of the Toxicity Activity of Bioactive Compounds of Some Geophytes against Brine Shrimp (Artemia salina L.). Acta Aquatica Turcica, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 195–201. https://ajindex.com/articles/198267

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Almeida, L.M., Prado, A.D.L., Xavier-Silva, K.R., Firmino, M.T., Paula, M.I.M., Gomes, P.N., Paula, J.A.M., & Bailão, E.F.L.C. (2020). Cytotoxic effect of Vernonanthura polyanthes leaves aqueous extracts, Brazilian Journal of Biology, In Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.225281
  2. AnalystSoft Inc. Released. (2015).
  3. Statplus Professional for Windows, Version 5.9.8.5, Walnut, CA: AnalystSoft Inc. Ara, J., Sultana, V., Ehteshamul-Haque, S., Qasim, R., & Uddin, V. (1999). Cytotoxic Activity of Marine Macro-algae on Artemia salina (Brine Shrimp). Phytotherapy Research, 13, 304-307. Artemia salina (Linnaeus, 1758) in GBIF Secretariat. (2019a). GBIF Backbone Taxonomy. Checklist dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/39omei accessed via GBIF.org on 2020-09-06. Arum rupicola var. virescens (Stapf) P.C. Boyce in Plant List. (2012a).
  4. The Plant List, Published on the Internet; http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/record/kew-16375 (accessed 2020-05-07).
  5. Asem, A., Nasrullah, R.P., & Patricio, D.L.R.E. (2010). The genus Artemia Leach, 1819 (Crustacea: Branchiopoda). I. True and false taxonomical descriptions. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research, 38(3), 501-506. https://doi.org/10.3856/vol38-issue3-fulltext-14
  6. Başbuğ, Y. (1999). Reproduction Characteristics of Artemia salina (L., 1758) in Tuz Lake. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 23(2), 635-640.
  7. Carballo, J. L., Hernández-Inda, Z.L., Pérez, P., & García-Grávalos, M.D. (2002). A comparison between two brine shrimp assays to detect in vitro cytotoxicity in marine natural products. BMC Biotechnology, 2, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-2-17 Carvalho F.D., & Moreira L.A. (2017). Why is Aedes aegypti Linnaeus so Successful as a Species? Neotropical Entomology, 46, 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-017-0520-4 Cyclamen cilicium Boiss. & Heldr. in Plant List. (2012b).
  8. The Plant List, Published on the Internet; http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/record/kew-2749712 (accessed 2020-05-07).
  9. Demarchi, C.A., Silva, L.M., Niedźwiecka, A., Ślawska-Waniewska, A., Lewińska, S., Magro, J. D., Calisto, J.F.F., Martello, R., & Rodrigues, C.A. (2020). Nanoecotoxicology study of the response of magnetic O-Carboxymethylchitosan loaded silver nanoparticles on Artemia salina. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 74, 103298, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2019.103298 Gagea bohemica (Zauschn.) Schult. & Schult.f. in Plant List. (2012c).
  10. The Plant List, Published on the Internet; http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/record/kew-307157 (