Journals / Business and Management Studies: An International Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG KNOWLEDGE SHARING, INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL AND PERFORMANCE FROM INNOVATION QUALITY PERSPECTIVE

YENİLİKÇİLİK KALİTESİ PERSPEKTİFİNDEN BİLGİ PAYLAŞIMI, ENTELEKTÜEL SERMAYE VE PERFORMANS İLİŞKİSİ

Pages
71–94
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We also determined that the innovation quality moderates the relationships between intellectual capital variables and operational performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to investigate how i) knowledge sharing (KS) contributes to firm’s intellectual capital, ii) intellectual capital influence on operational and financial performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We also show the moderating role of innovation quality on the relationships among human, structural and relational capitals and operational performance rather than linear relationships.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We also determined that the innovation quality moderates the relationships between intellectual capital variables and operational performance.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate how i) knowledge sharing (KS) contributes to firm’s intellectual capital, ii) intellectual capital influence on operational and financial performance. We also show the moderating role of innovation quality on the relationships among human, structural and relational capitals and operational performance rather than linear relationships. In this context, by studying 161 employees, we conducted structural equation modelling on the basis of using the AMOS 23 method. Next, we analyzed moderating role of innovation quality between intellectual capital variables and operational performance. In light of findings, we found that 1) explicit and tacit knowledge sharing affect intellectual capital variables, 2) intellectual capital variables contribute to firm’s operational performance, and 3) operational performance influence the financial performance. We also determined that the innovation quality moderates the relationships between intellectual capital variables and operational performance.

Özet

Çalışmanın amacı; açık ve örtülü bilgi paylaşımı mekanizmalarının firmanın entelektüel sermayesine olan katkıları ile başlayıp, operasyonel ve finansal performansa olan etkisi ile biten ilişkiler ağını Türkiye özelinde ampirik olarak test etmektir. Ayrıca bu çalışma özellikle diğer çalışmalardaki doğrusal ilişkiler yerine, entelektüel sermaye değişkenlerinin firma performansına etkisinde pazara yönelik yenilikçilik kalitesinin etkileşim etkisine odaklanarak literatüre katkı sunmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, 161 firma çalışanından elde edilen nicel veriler ile AMOS 23 programı aracılığıyla ilk olarak yapısal eşitlik analizi gerçekleştirilmiş, daha sonra moderator analizi yapılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular ışığında;1) firma içinde gerçekleştirilen açık ve örtük bilgi paylaşımlarının entelektüel sermaye boyutlarını pozitif olarak etkilediği, 2) entelektüel sermaye boyutlarının operasyonel performansı güçlendirdiği ve 3) operasyonel performansın firmanın finansal performansına anlamlı ve pozitif olarak etki ettiği bulunmuştur. Ayrıca pazardaki yenilikçilik kalitesinin entelektüel sermaye boyutları ile operasyonel performans arasında moderator role sahip olduğu ampirik olarak kanıtlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KESKİN, H., ŞENTÜRK, H. A., BEYDOĞAN, A. (2018). THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG KNOWLEDGE SHARING, INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL AND PERFORMANCE FROM INNOVATION QUALITY PERSPECTIVE. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 71–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/198115

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aiken, L. S., West, S. G ve Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing And Interpreting Interactions. Sage. Akgün, A.E., Keskin, H ve Byrne, J., C. (2009), “Organizational emotional capability, product and process innovation and firm performance: An empirical analysis”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 26, 103-130.
  2. Akgün, A.E., Keskin, H. ve Günsel, A. (2009). Bilgi Yönetimi ve Öğrenen Örgütler. Bilgi Yönetimi ve Öğrenen Örgütler. Eflatun Yayınevi.
  3. Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., Ayar, H. ve Okunakol, Z. (2017), “knowledge sharing barriers in software development teams: A multiple case study in Turkey”, Kybernetes, 46(4), 603-620.
  4. Aramburu, N ve Saenz, J. (2011), “Structural capital, innovation capability, and size effect: An empirical study”, Journal of Management Organization, 17(3), 307–325.
  5. Bock, G.W ve Kim, Y.G. (2002), “Breaking the myths of rewards”, Information Resources Management Journal, 15(2), 14– 21. Bukh, P.N., Larsen, H. T ve Mouritsen, J. (2001), “Constructing intellectual capital statements”, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 17, 87-108.
  6. Campbell, B. A., Coff, R ve Kryscynski, D. (2012), “Rethinking sustained competitive advantage from human capital”, The Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 376-395.
  7. Chase, R. L. (1997), “Knowledge management benchmarks”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(1), 83-92.
  8. Chen, Y.S. (2008), “The positive effect of green intellectual capital on competitive advantages of firms”, Journal of Business Ethics, 77(3), 271-286.
  9. Choi, B ve Lee, H. (2003), “An emprical investigation of km styles and their effect on corporate performance”, Information & Management, 40(3), 403-417.
  10. Cousins, P. D., Handfield, R. B., Lawson, B ve Petersen, K. J. (2006), “Creating supply chain relational capital: The impact of formal and informal socialization processes”, Journal of operations management, 24(6), 851-863.
  11. Crook, T.R., Combs J.G, Ketchen D.J, Todd S ve Woehr, D. (2011), “Does human capital matter? A meta analysis of the relationship between human capital and firm performance”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 443-456.
  12. Curtis, B., Hefley, W.E ve Miller, S. (1995), People Capability Maturity Model. Pennsylvania: Pittsburgh Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University. Cyert, R. M ve March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Darroch, J. (2005), “Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), 101-11