SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler / 2004 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

Best Value Fraework in the British Local Authorities and Inspection of Best Value Regime

İngiltere'de Yerel Yönetimlerin Uyguladığı Başarı Ölçüm Sistemi ve Denetimi

Birol EKİCİ
Pages
37–61
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The Audit Commission tries to promote the optimal use of public resources by giving assistance to suppliers of public services in achieving economic, efficient and effective service provision.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The UK public management reform aims to increase efficiency and effectiveness for an excellent organization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Best Value framework was developed by the UK Government to introduce performance management in local government services.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The Audit Commission tries to promote the optimal use of public resources by giving assistance to suppliers of public services in achieving economic, efficient and effective service provision.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The UK public management reform aims to increase efficiency and effectiveness for an excellent organization. The Best Value framework was developed by the UK Government to introduce performance management in local government services. It was put forward in 1998 as a part of the ‘modernizing government’ conduct. All local government services are subject to Best Value. Inspection is an important element of the regulation of public services. The government gave the responsibility of evaluating the implementation of Best Value to the Audit Commission which established the Best Value Inspectorate to assess local government service supply plans in relation to Best Value. The Audit Commission tries to promote the optimal use of public resources by giving assistance to suppliers of public services in achieving economic, efficient and effective service provision.

Özet

İngiltere’de kamu yönetimi reformu sürecinde, etkinlik ve verimliliğin artırılması ve kusursuz bir organizasyonun kurulması arayışları sürmektedir. Bu arayışlar sürecinde, yerel yönetimlerde performans yönetimine geçmek için İngiltere hükümeti tarafından “En İyi Değer Yönetimi” geliştirilmiştir. 1998 yılında “yönetimin modernleştirilmesi”nin bir parçası olarak gündeme getirilen yaklaşım, tüm yerel yönetim hizmetlerini kapsamaktadır. Denetim, kamu hizmetlerinin düzenlenmesinde önemli bir unsurdur. En İyi Değer Yönetimi’nin uygulanmasının denetimi için hükümet tarafından yetkilendirilen Denetim Komisyonu, bu kapsamda hazırlanan yerel yönetim hizmet sunum planlarını değerlendirmek suretiyle denetim yapmaktadır. Komisyon, kamu finansmanına gözcülük ederek ve kamu hizmetlerinin sunumuyla görevli olanlara etkinlik, verimlilik ve tutumluluğu sağlamaları konusunda yardımcı olarak kamu parasının en iyi şekilde kullanımını geliştirmeye çalışır.

🔖

Cite This Article

EKİCİ, B. (2004). Best Value Fraework in the British Local Authorities and Inspection of Best Value Regime. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 37–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/195999

References (7)

  1. Audit Commission (2002), “Stewardship and governance, A review of the work of the Audit Commission’s appointed auditors in 2002”, http://www.audit-commission.gov.uk.pdf (10.10.2003). Audit Commission (2002a), “Council audits will involve local people”, Community Care; 2/14/2002 Issue 1409, p8, 2p. Audit Commission (2003), “Annual Report 2003 Year ended October 2002”, http://www.audit-commission.gov.uk.pdf (10.10.2003). Audit Commission (2003a), “Councils launch judicial review”, Community Care, 1/8/2003 Issue 1453, p6, 1/4p. Audit Commission (2003b), “New audit boss calls for target reduction”, Community Care; 1/16/2003 Issue 1455, p6, 1/9p. Beecham, Jeremy (2003), “Anger over new assessment guides”, Community Care, 5/29/2003 Issue 1474, p7, 1/5p. Bennett, Joan (1999), “Will best value bring sustainability in from the cold?”, Local Environment; Feb99, Vol. 4 Issue 1, p73, 5p. “Best Value and Audit Commission Performance Indicators for 2000/2001”, http://www.local-regions.detr.gov.uk/bestvalue/performance/pi_cons.doc.
  2. Boyne George, Day Patricia, Walker Richard (2002), “The Evaluation of Public Service Inspection: A Theoretical Framework”, Urban Studies, Vol. 39, No. 7, 1197–1212.
  3. Çetin, Sefa (2000), “Analysis of Best Value in The British Local Public Services in The Years 1998-2000”,
  4. Yayınlanmamış Master Tezi, Middlesex University, School of Social Science Guidance on Best Value for Town and Parish Councils, http://www.odpm.gov.uk.-Stellent.htm (10.10.2003).
  5. Hirst, Judy (2001), “They're selling off your council”, New Statesman, 03/26/2001, Vol. 130 Issue 4530, p33, 2p. Hull, Angela (2000), “Modernizing Democracy: Constructing a Radical Reform of the Planning System?”, European Planning Studies; Dec2000, Vol. 8 Issue 6,p767, 16p. Mid Sussex District Council (2003), “Best Value”, http://www.midsussex.gov.uk.html (23.10.2003).
  6. Raynsford, Nick (2002), “Four additions to Best Value indicators”, Community Care, 9/26/2002 Issue 1441, p8, 1/4p. Office of Deputy Prime Minister, “Best Value Inspection and intervention: Annual report 1999-2000” http://www.odpm.gov.uk.html (20.10.2003).
  7. Pearce, Jonathan (2002), “White paper sets out plans for 'scorecards' and more deregulation”, Community Care, 1/10/2002 Issue 1404, p10, 1/2p. Rodney McAdam ve Tımothy Walker (2003), “Evaluatıng The Best Value Framework ın UK Local Government Services ”, www.interscience.wiley.com (10.10.2003). Scottish Office Development Department Local Government Division (1997), “Best Value Task For