Journals / Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler / 2007 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3

Sağlık Sisteminde Yerinden Yönetim: Sağlık Hizmetlerinin İl Özel İdareleri ve Belediyeler Tarafından Sunulması

Pages
49–69
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Proponents argue that decentralization promises more direct accountability of health care institutions, more efficient management of resources, better linkages between information and planning, easier interagency coordination, and the ability to respond more effectively to the variety of different needs and capacities of different regions and localities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Decentralization of health care system can be defined as the transfer of responsibility in planning, decision-making, resource generation and allocation, and of administrative authority from the central government to the provincial units of central government and to the local governments.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Decentralization had been put into practice in the late 1970's and continued throughout the 1980's.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Proponents argue that decentralization promises more direct accountability of health care institutions, more efficient management of resources, better linkages between information and planning, easier interagency coordination, and the ability to respond more effectively to the variety of different needs and capacities of different regions and localities.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Decentralization of health care system can be defined as the transfer of responsibility in planning, decision-making, resource generation and allocation, and of administrative authority from the central government to the provincial units of central government and to the local governments. Decentralization is regarded as a key element of the primary health care approach. Decentralization had been put into practice in the late 1970's and continued throughout the 1980's. Decentralization is a major feature of health care systems around the world today. Proponents argue that decentralization promises more direct accountability of health care institutions, more efficient management of resources, better linkages between information and planning, easier interagency coordination, and the ability to respond more effectively to the variety of different needs and capacities of different regions and localities.

Özet

Sağlık hizmetlerinde yerinden yönetim (desantralizasyon); planlama, karar oluşturma, istihdam, kaynak yaratma ve yönetim yetkisinin merkezi hükümetin taşra birimlerine, yerel yönetimlere veya daha alt yönetim seviyelerine devredilmesidir. Yerinden yönetimin amacı, sağlık hizmetlerinin vatandaşlara daha yakın idari birimlerce vatandaş odaklı sunumu ve maliyetlerin düşürülmesidir. Yerinden yönetim uygulamaları 1970’li yılların sonlarında başlamış, 1980’li yıllar boyunca devam etmiş ve günümüzde dünyanın her tarafında geniş ölçüde kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Yerinden yönetimin hizmetlerin etkili, verimli ve en az maliyetle sunulmasını sağladığı; hesap verilebilirliği, şeffaflığı ve katılımı artırdığı savunulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPACA, E., EKİCİ, B. (2007). Sağlık Sisteminde Yerinden Yönetim: Sağlık Hizmetlerinin İl Özel İdareleri ve Belediyeler Tarafından Sunulması. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3, 49–69. https://ajindex.com/articles/185746

References (11)

  1. Aitken, Iain W. (1999), "Implementation and Itegration of Reproductive Health Services in a Decentralized System. In Myths and Realities about the Decentralization of Health Systems", Kolehmainen-Aitken, Riitta-Lisa (Eds.), Management Sciences for Health, Boston, s. 111-136.
  2. Alexis, Obrey (2006), "Is decentralization the key to achieving equity in health care in developing countries?", http://www.iphn.org/obrey2.rtf (13.03.2006).
  3. Bossert, Thomas (1998), "Analyzing the Decentralization of Health Systems in Developing Countries: Decision Space, Innovation and Performance", Social Science and Medicine, 47 (10), s. 1513-1527.
  4. Bossert, Thomas-Soebekti, R.- Rai, Nyoman Kumara (1991), "Bottom-up" Planning in Indonesia: Decentralization in the Ministry of Health. Health Policy Plan. 6 (1), s. 55-63.
  5. Bryant, Malcolm (1999), "Planning for and Within Decentralized Health Systems", In Myths and Realities about the Decentralization of Health Systems, Kolehmainen-Aitken, Riitta-Lisa (Eds.), Management Sciences for Health, Boston, s. 11-26.
  6. Collins Charles D. ve Gren, Andrew T. (1993), "Decentralisation and Primary Health Care in Developing Countries: Ten Key Questions", Journal of Management in Medicine, 7, s, 58-68.
  7. Collins Charles D. ve Gren, Andrew T. (1994), "Decentralisation and Primary Health Care: Some Negative Implications in Developing Countries", International Journal of Health Services, 24, s. 459-475.
  8. Conn, Cath-Green, Cathy- Walley, John (1996), "Effective District Health Services in Developing Countries: A Busy Manager's Guide to the Literature", IDS, Sussex'den aktaran Omar, Mayeh (2006), Health Sector Decentralisation in Developing Countries: Unique or Universal", http://www.hospitalmanagement.net/ihfdocs/-world_hospital_article/health_sector_decentralisation_in_dev_Countries.pdf (15.03.2006).
  9. Dillinger, William (1995), "Better Urban Services: Finding the Right Incentives." Washington, DC: World Bank. Dünya Bankası (2006a), Decentralization http://web.worldbank.org/wbsite/external-/topics/exthealthnutritionandpopulation/exthsd/.html (13.03.2006). Dünya Bankası (2006b), Decentralization and Health Care, http://www.ciesin.org/-decentralization/English/Issues/Health.html (13.03.2006).
  10. Elamon, Joy- Franke, Richard W. - Ekbal, B. (2004), "Decentralization of Health Services: The Kerala People's Campaign", International Journal of Health Services, Volume 34, Number 4, Baywood Publishing Co, s. 681-708.
  11. Gershberg, Alec Ian (2000), "Decentralisation, Recentralis