Journals / Kalem Uluslararası Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Ortaöğretim Öğrencilerinin Serbest Kıyafet Politikasına İlişkin Görüşleri: Mümtaz Turhan Sosyal Bilimler Lisesi Örneği

Pages
13–75
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the study, students' views on the new appearance regime concentrates on several main themes such as democratization, sense of belonging to the school, period of change, socio-economic level and personal image development.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Dressing is not only a piece of cloth that covers the body of humans but also a means of communication that symbolizes one's philosophical, social, psychological, economic, cultural, aesthetic, religious, moral etc. perspectives and identity by surrounding the individual and social life of one which in result affects one's personality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In 2012, appearance regime in schools was changed with a legislative regulation in Turkey in favor of free dress code.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the study, students' views on the new appearance regime concentrates on several main themes such as democratization, sense of belonging to the school, period of change, socio-economic level and personal image development.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Dressing is not only a piece of cloth that covers the body of humans but also a means of communication that symbolizes one's philosophical, social, psychological, economic, cultural, aesthetic, religious, moral etc. perspectives and identity by surrounding the individual and social life of one which in result affects one's personality. In 2012, appearance regime in schools was changed with a legislative regulation in Turkey in favor of free dress code. It is important to scrutinize all the factors that contributed to the process of this policy's administration. All these reasons in mind, this study tries to designate the high school students' perceptions and considerations related to this new appearance regime. The target population of the study is eleven (6 females, 5 males) high school students in 9th and 12th grades who volunteered for this study and this study took place in 2013-2014 educational years. The data of the study was gathered through interview form which consists of fifteen open-ended questions in total and questions were developed by the researchers. Data used in this study were gathered on a qualitative based method and were construed with content analysis techniques. According to the results of the study, students' views on the new appearance regime concentrates on several main themes such as democratization, sense of belonging to the school, period of change, socio-economic level and personal image development. It has been observed that the students are mainly pleased with this new situation but the meaning they put into this concept and their comments differ

Özet

Giyim, insanların sadece bedenini koruyan bir örtü değil, felsefî, sosyal, psikolojik, siyasal, ekonomik, kültürel, estetik, dinî, ahlâkî vb. açılardan onları sembolize eden ve kimliklerini, kişiliklerini de etkileyerek bireysel ve toplumsal hayatlarını kuşatan bir iletişim aracıdır. Türkiye'de 2012 yılında gerçekleştirilen bir yasal düzenleme ile görünüm rejimi değiştirilmiş, okullarda kılık kıyafet serbestliği getirilmiştir. Bu sürecin sağlıklı yönetilebilmesinde etki eden bütün faktörlerin irdelenmesi önemlidir. Bu nedenlerle bu çalışmada, lise öğrencilerinin yeni görünüm rejimine ilişkin algı ve düşünceleri belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu 2013-2014 öğretim yılında, Mümtaz Turhan Sosyal Bilimler Lisesi'nde birinci ve dördüncü öğrenci oluşturmuştur. Araştırmanın verileri araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen, toplamda 15 açık uçlu sorudan oluşan görüşme formu ile elde edilmiştir. Araştırmada ulaşılan veriler nitel yöntemle elde edilmiş ve içerik analizi tekniği ile çözümlenmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre yeni görünüm rejimine ilişkin öğrenci görüşlerinin; demokratikleşme, okul âidiyet duygusu, değişim süreci, sosyo-ekonomik düzey ve kişisel imaj gelişimi ana temalarında yoğunlaştığı belirlenmiştir. Öğrencilerin yeni durumdan çoğunlukla memnun oldukları; ancak yükledikleri anlam ve yorumlarının farklılaştığı görülmüştür

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNDÜZ, H. B., SÜER, N. B. (2016). Ortaöğretim Öğrencilerinin Serbest Kıyafet Politikasına İlişkin Görüşleri: Mümtaz Turhan Sosyal Bilimler Lisesi Örneği. Kalem Uluslararası Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 13–75. https://ajindex.com/articles/194488

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akbaba, A. ve Konak, M. (2014). Yeni ilk orta ve lise kıyafet yönet- meliğinin veli ve öğrenci görüşlerine göre incelenmesi. Turkish Studies - International Periodical for the Languages Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 9(2), 21-40.
  2. Anderson, W. (2002). School dress codes and uniform policies (Rapor No. 4). University of Oregon: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educati- onal Management. http://eric.uoregon.edu/pdf/policyreports/policy%20report%20dr ess%20code.pdf Arthur, B. L. (1999). Introduction: Dress and the social control of the body. L. B. Arthur, (Ed.), Religion, dress and the body içinde (1-7). Oxford: Berg. Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139-168.
  3. Blumer, H. (1986). Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. California: Univ. of California Press.
  4. Blumer, H. (1998). The methodological position of symbolic interac- tionism. Sociology. Thought and Action, 2(2), 147-156.
  5. Bodine, A. (2003). School uniforms, academic achievement, and uses of research. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(2), 67-71.
  6. Boutelle, M. (2008). Uniforms: Are they a good fit? Education Digest, 73(6), 34-37. EBSCOhost veritabanından edinilmiştir. Bowen, J. (2003). History of western education. London: Routledge. Brunsma, D. L. ve Rockquemore, K. A. (1998). Effects of student uniforms on attendance, behavior problems, substance use, and academic achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 92(1), 53-62.
  7. Brunsma, L. D. (2004). The school uniform movement and what it tells us about American education. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Little- field Publishing Group. Burkemper, M. L. (2008). The attitudes and perceptions of students toward the wearing of uniforms in public high schools. Yayım- lanmamış doktora tezi, University Of Missouri-St. Louis Gradu- ate School. Bursalıoğlu, Z. (2003). Okul yönetiminde yeni yapı ve davranış. An- kara: Pegem A Yayıncılık. Carnegie, D. (2010). Söz söyleme ve iş başarma sanatı. İstanbul:
  8. Ep- silon Yayınları.
  9. Chen, G. (2008). Public school uniforms: The pros and cons for your child. Public School Review. http://www.publicschoolreview.com/articles/16.
  10. Coffey, A. ve Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. California: Sage Publicati- ons, Inc. Cohn, C. A. (1996). Mandatory school uniforms. The School Admin- istrator, 53(2), 22-25.
  11. Cohn, C. A. ve Siegel, L. (1996). Should students wear uniforms? Learning, 25(2), 38-39.
  12. Coser, L. A. (2010). Sosyo