Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2019 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4

COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS OF PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA AND PAIN PUMP VERSUS PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA FOLLOWING SURGERY FOR ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS

Pages
261–265
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Following surgery for AIS, PP + PCA is a good choice for postoperative analgesia in the early postoperative period (the first 12 hours), reducing postoperative use of opioids and allowing patients to walk and to be discharged earlier.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The pain control is a difficult and tedious process following a surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: In the present study, the results of patients at the age of 12 to 22 years, who had an AIS surgery between 2016 and 2019 at our clinic, were retrospectively reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Following surgery for AIS, PP + PCA is a good choice for postoperative analgesia in the early postoperative period (the first 12 hours), reducing postoperative use of opioids and allowing patients to walk and to be discharged earlier.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The pain control is a difficult and tedious process following a surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Although there are many treatment methods used to relieve pain, the pain is not completely controlled yet. This study was aimed to compare the effectiveness of intravenous patient controlled analgesia (PCA) and a combination of PCA and pain pump (PP) (PP + PCA) used after surgery for AIS. Materials and Methods: In the present study, the results of patients at the age of 12 to 22 years, who had an AIS surgery between 2016 and 2019 at our clinic, were retrospectively reviewed. The patients’ postoperative pain scores, need for opioids, time to walk, and discharge time were compared. Results: The results of 83 patients (Group PCA, n=34; Group PP + PCA, n=49) that met the study criteria were compared. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at the postoperative 6th and 12th hours were lower in the group PP + PCA (p 0.05). The time to walk for the group PP + PCA was significantly earlier than for the group PCA (2.67±0.99 vs. 3.68±0.94, p<0.0001). As for discharge time, the group PP + PCA was discharged earlier than the group PCA (8.00±2.03 vs. 10.00±4.56, p=0.045). With regard to the postoperative use of opioids, the use by the group PP + PCA was less than the group PCA at the end of both 24th hour and 48th hour (p<0.001). Conclusion: Following surgery for AIS, PP + PCA is a good choice for postoperative analgesia in the early postoperative period (the first 12 hours), reducing postoperative use of opioids and allowing patients to walk and to be discharged earlier.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILAR, S., AHISKALIOĞLU, A. (2019). COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS OF PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA AND PAIN PUMP VERSUS PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA FOLLOWING SURGERY FOR ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4, 261–265. https://ajindex.com/articles/192848

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Arms DM, Smith JT, Osteyee J, Gartrell AJO. Postoperative epidural analgesia for pediatric spine surgery. Orthopedics 1998;21:539-44
  2. Blumenthal S, Borgeat A, Nadig M, Min K. Postoperative analgesia after anterior correction of thoracic scoliosis: a prospective randomized study comparing continuous double epidural catheter technique with intravenous morphine. Spine 2006;31:1646-51
  3. Elder JB, Hoh DJ, Wang MY. Postoperative continuous paravertebral anesthetic infusion for pain control in lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Spine 2008;33:210-8
  4. Gauger VT, Voepel-Lewis TD, Burke CN, Kostrzewa AJ, Caird MS, Wagner DS, et al. Epidural analgesia compared with intravenous analgesia after pediatric posterior spinal fusion. J Pediatr Orthop 2009;29:588-93
  5. Gulur P, Nishimori M, Ballantyne JC. Regional anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia, morbidity and mortality. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2006;20:249-63
  6. Hong RA, Gibbons KM, Li GY, Holman A, Voepel-Lewis T. A retrospective comparison of intrathecal morphine and epidural hydromorphone for analgesia following posterior spinal fusion in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Paediatr Anaesth 2017;27:91-97
  7. Jones MD, Aronsson DD, Harkins JM, Smail DF, Haugh LD. Epidural analgesia for postoperative pain control in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1998;18:492-6
  8. Klatt JW, Mickelson J, Hung M, Durcan S, Miller C, Smith JT. A randomized prospective evaluation of 3 techniques of postoperative pain management after posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion. Spine 2013;38:1626-31
  9. Milbrandt TA, Singhal M, Minter C, McClung A, Talwalkar VR, Iwinski HJ, et al. A comparison of three methods of pain control for posterior spinal fusions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. 2009;34:1499-503
  10. Milbrandt TA, Singhal M, Minter C, McClung A, Talwalkar VR, Iwinski HJ, et al. A comparison of three methods of pain control for posterior spinal fusions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:1499-503
  11. Ross PA, Smith BM, Tolo VT, Khemani RGJS. Continuous infusion of bupivacaine reduces postoperative morphine use in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after posterior spine fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:1478-83
  12. Saudan S, Habre W, Ceroni D, Meyer PA, Greenberg RS, Kaelin A, et al. Safety and efficacy of patient controlled epidural analgesia following pediatric spinal surgery. Paediatr Anaesth 2008;18:132-9
  13. Singh K, Phillips FM, Kuo E, Campbell M. A prospective, randomized, d