Journals / Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of life quality in patients treated surgically for hip fracture

Kalça Kırığı Nedeniyle Opere Edilen Hastalarda Yaşam Kalitesinin Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
103–108
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The data obtained in this study can be used for future healthcare evaluation and to calculate quality-adjusted life years

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The purpose of this study was to understand the quality of life for patients with hip fractures which are treated surgically.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: We reviewed the results in patients with hip fracture who were treated surgically from December 2007 to May 2012 at Haseki Training and Research Hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The data obtained in this study can be used for future healthcare evaluation and to calculate quality-adjusted life years
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to understand the quality of life for patients with hip fractures which are treated surgically. Material and Methods: We reviewed the results in patients with hip fracture who were treated surgically from December 2007 to May 2012 at Haseki Training and Research Hospital. There were 86 female and 55 male patient with an avarage age of 81.6 years. The mean duration of follow-up for all patients was 23.7 months (1-54). Eighty-nine patients had trochanteric fractures and fifty-two patients had femoral neck fractures. Sixty hip fractures were treated with dynamic hip screw (DHS), two cases with proximal femoral nailing (PFN), one case with Gama Nail, seventy-tree cases treated with partial artroplasty and five cases treated with total hip artroplasty. The mean American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) score for patients was 2.4 (1-4). Mortality rate, walking ability, activities of daily living (ADL) function and health related quality of life assessed with the EQ-5D score. Results: The 1-year mortality rate was 29%, approximately half of the patients (47.5%) with hip fractures treated by surgically reported no or limited pain and 37.8% of patients lost their walking ability. There was no connection between quality of life and hip fracture type. Quality of life was decreased with increasing ASA score and elderly population. Conclusion: Beside high mortality rate this study confirmed that quality of life decreased after hip fractures. Also patients’ walking ability and activity of daily living changed for the worse. The data obtained in this study can be used for future healthcare evaluation and to calculate quality-adjusted life years

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı cerrahi olarak tedavi edilen kalça kırıklı hastaların yaşam kalitesinin durumunu irdelemektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Aralık 2007 ve Mayıs 2012 tarihleri arasında Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Kliniği’nde kalça kırığı nedeniyle tedavisi yapılan ve yeterli takibi yapılabilen 86’sı kadın, 55’i erkek toplam 141 olgu çalışmamızın materyalini oluşturmaktadır. Olguların ortalama takip süresi 23.7±16 ay (1-54 ay), Olgularımızın yaş ortalaması ise 81.6±8.7 yıl idi. Olguların 89’u intertrokanterik kırık, 52’si femur boyun kırığıdır. 60 olguya dinamik kalça vidası (DHS), 2 olguya proksimal femoral çivi (PFN), 1 olguya Gama nail, 73 olguya hemiartroplasti ve 5 olguya da total kalça protezi uygulandı. Olguların ortalama American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) skorları 2.4±0.9 idi (1-5). Mortalite oranı, yürüme kabiliyetleri, günlük yaşam aktivite fonksiyonları ve sağlık ilişkili hayat kalitesi EQ-5D değerlendirme skalası temel alınarak değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Bir yıllık mortalite oranı %29 olarak belirlendi. Olguların %47.5’inde şikâyet az, ya da yoktu. Olguların %37.6’sının yürüyemediği gözlendi. Olguların EQ-5D değerlendirme skalası ile belirlenen yaşam kalitesi ile kırık tipi arasında anlamlı bir ilişki saptanmadı. ASA skoru yükseldikçe olguların yaşam kalitesinin anlamlı bir şekilde düştüğü belirlendi. Yine yaş ilerledikçe hastanın yaşam kalitesinin de düştüğü gözlendi. Sonuç: Beklenen mortalite oranın yüksek olmasının yanında bu çalışmanın sonuçları hastaların yaşam kalitesinin kalça kırığından sonra düştüğünü doğruladı. Bununla beraber hastaların yürüme kabiliyetlerinde ve günlük yaşam aktivitelerinde belirgin bir bozulma da gözlend

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENER, N., KORKMAZ, M., YILMAZ, M., ORDU, S., ÇETİNUS, M. E. (2015). Evaluation of life quality in patients treated surgically for hip fracture. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 103–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/192681

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Nurmi I, Narinen A, Lüthje P, Tanninen S. Cost analysis of hip fracture treatment among the elderly for the public health services: a 1-year prospective study in 106 consecutive patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2003; 123: 551-554
  2. Hannan EL, Magaziner J, Wang JJ, et al. Mortality and locomotion 6 months after hospitalization for hip fracture: risk factors and risk- adjusted hospital outcomes. JAMA 2001; 285: 2736-2742
  3. Haentjens P, Autier P, Barette M, Boonen S, Belgian Hip Fracture Study Group. The economic cost of hip fractures among elderly women. A one-year, prospective, observational cohort study with matched-pair analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83-A: 493-500
  4. Lavelle DG. Fractures and dislocations of the hip. In: Canale ST, Beaty JH (Eds) Campell’s Operative Orthopaedics. (11th ed) Mosby Year Book, Philadelphia 2008; p. 3237-3285
  5. Parker MJ, Handoll HHG. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 4: CD000093
  6. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996; 37: 53-72
  7. Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1972; 54: 61-76
  8. De Lee JC. Fractures and dislocation of the hip. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults. 4th Edition, 1996; p. 1785-1796
  9. Browner DB, Jüpiter JB, Levine AM, Trafton PG. Fractures and dislocation of the hip. Skeletal Trauma 1996; 2: 1833-1926
  10. Lorich DG, Geller DS, Nielson JH. Osteoporotic pertrochanteric hip fractures management and current controversies. J Bone Joint Surg 2004; 86: 398-410
  11. Öztürk İ, Domaniç Ü. Trokanterik kırıkların Ender çivileri ile tedavisinden sonra görülen dışa rotasyon deformitesinin nedenleri ve önlemleri. Acta Orthop Trauma Turc 1986; 20: 297-300
  12. Hedlund R, Lingren U, Ahlbom A. Age- and sex specific incidence of femoral neck and trochanteric fractures. An analysis based on 20,538 fractures in Stockholm County, Sweden, 1972-1981. Clin Orthop 1985; 222: 132-139
  13. Magaziner J, Simonsick EM, Kashner TM, Hebel JR, Kenzora JE. Predictors of functional recovery one year following hospital discharge for hip fracture: A prospective study. J Gerontol Med Sci 1990; 45: 101-107
  14. Van Balen R, Essink-Bot ML, Steyerberg E, Cools H, Habbema DF. Quality of life after hip fracture: a comparison of four health status measures in 208 patients. Disa