SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3

VOICE HANDICAP INDEX MEASUREMENT OF PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT REFLUX OPERATION

REFLÜ OPERASYONU GEÇİREN HASTALARIN SES HANDİKAP İNDEKSİ ÖLÇÜMÜ

Şahin ULU
Murat AKICI
Mümtaz ERAKIN
Selçuk KUZU
Pages
276–280
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Compared with the preoperative period, there was a statistically significant improvement in VHI total score and functional, physical and emotional subgroup scores after the operation.CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, in this study, a significant relationship was found between reflux surgery and voice handicap index scores.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: In this study; it was aimed to compare the voice handicap indices (VHI) of the patients who were operated for reflux to compare the preoperative and 3 months postoperative voice handicap.MATERIAL AND METHODS: 30 patients operated by operated by Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University General Surgery Clinic between 2014-2017 due to reflux were compared compared in terms of preoperative and postoperative 3rd month voice handicap indices (VHI) by Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University Ear Nose Throat Clinic.RESULTS: Sixteen (53%) of the patients included in the study were male and 14 (47%) were female.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The average age is 32.45 ± 10.16.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Compared with the preoperative period, there was a statistically significant improvement in VHI total score and functional, physical and emotional subgroup scores after the operation.CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, in this study, a significant relationship was found between reflux surgery and voice handicap index scores.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014-2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Gastroözefagial reflü · Ses Handikap Indeksi · Laparoskopik nissen fundoplikasyon

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this study; it was aimed to compare the voice handicap indices (VHI) of the patients who were operated for reflux to compare the preoperative and 3 months postoperative voice handicap.MATERIAL AND METHODS: 30 patients operated by operated by Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University General Surgery Clinic between 2014-2017 due to reflux were compared compared in terms of preoperative and postoperative 3rd month voice handicap indices (VHI) by Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University Ear Nose Throat Clinic.RESULTS: Sixteen (53%) of the patients included in the study were male and 14 (47%) were female. The average age is 32.45 ± 10.16. Compared with the preoperative period, there was a statistically significant improvement in VHI total score and functional, physical and emotional subgroup scores after the operation.CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, in this study, a significant relationship was found between reflux surgery and voice handicap index scores.

Özet

AMAÇ: Bu çalışmada; reflü sebebiyle opere edilen hastaların ameliyat öncesi ve ameliyat sonrası 3. ay ses handikap indekslerin (SHI) karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır.GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Reflü sebebiyle Afyonkarahisar Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Genel Cerrahi Kliniği tarafından 2014-2017 yılları arasında opere edilen 30 hastanın Afyonkarahisar Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Kulak Burun Boğaz Kliniği tarafından ameliyat öncesi ve ameliyat sonrası 3. ay ses handikap indekslerin (SHI) karşılaştırılmıştır.BULGULAR: Çalışmaya alınan hastaların 16’sı (%53) erkek, 14’ü (%47) kadındır. Yaş ortalaması 32.45±10.16’dır Operasyon öncesi ile karşılaştırıldığında operasyon sonrasında SHI toplam skoru ile fonksiyonel, fiziksel ve emosyonel alt grup skorlarının tümünde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı iyileşme saptanmıştır.SONUÇ: Bu çalışmada reflü cerrahisi ve ses handikap indeks skorları arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulundu.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULU, Ş., AKICI, M., ERAKIN, M., KUZU, S. (2020). VOICE HANDICAP INDEX MEASUREMENT OF PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT REFLUX OPERATION. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 276–280. https://ajindex.com/articles/180671

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Chen CL, Robert JJ, Orr WC. Sleep symptoms and gastroesophageal reflux. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008;42:13-7
  2. Sveen S. Symptom check: is it GERD? J Contin Educ Nurs 2009;40:103-4
  3. Levine JS. Management of Barret Esophagus. Primary Care Case Reviews 2002;5:68-76
  4. Hogan WJ, Shaker R. Medical treatment of supraesophageal complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Med 2001;111:197-201
  5. Castell DO, Mainie I, Tutuian R. Non-acid gastroesophageal reflux: documenting its relationship to symptoms using multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII). Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 2005;116:321-3
  6. Bardhan KD. The role of proton pump inhibitors in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1999;9:15-25
  7. Yorulmaz İ. Larengofarengeal reflü, derleme. KBB-Forum 2002; 1(1):22-34
  8. Field SK, Unxderwood M, Brant R, Cowie RL. Prevelance of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in asthma. Chest 1996; 109: 316-22. 64 9. Harding SM, Guzzo MR, Richter JE. 24-h eshophageal pH testing in asthmatics: Respiratory symptom correlation with esophageal acid events. Chest 1999; 115: 654-9
  9. Irwin RS, Curley FJ, French CL. Difficult to control asthma contributing factors and outcome of a systematic management protocol. Chest 1993; 103:1662-9
  10. Koufman JA. The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): A clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24- hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury. Laryngoscope 1991;101(Suppl 53):1-78. 12.Koufman JA, Amin MR, Panetti M. Prevalence of reflux in 113 consecutive patients with laryngeal and voice disorders. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 123:385-8. 13.Ylitalo R, Lindestad P, Ramel S. Symptoms, laryngeal findings, and 24-hour pH monitoring in patients with suspected gastroesophago-pharyngeal reflux. Laryngoscope 2001; 111:1735-41. 14.Oelschlager BK, Eubanks TR, Maronian N, et al. Laryngoscopy and pharyngeal pH are complementary in the diagnosis of gastroesophageallaryngeal reflux. J Gastrointest Surg 2002; 6: 189-94. 15.Rouev P, Chakarski I, Doskov D, et al. Laryngopharyngeal symptoms and gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Voice 2005; 19: 476-80. 16.Little FB, Koufman JA, Kohut RI, Marshall RB. Effect of gastric acid on the pathogenesis of subglottic stenosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1985:94:516-9. 17.Book DT, Rhee JS, Toohill RJ, Smith TL. Perspectives in laryngophary