Journals / Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi / 2018 / YBHD 2018/2

CONSEQUENCES OF DOUBLE BROKERAGE ACTIVITY IN CASE OF BROKERAGE CONTRACT OF NEGOTIATION IN SWISS AND TURKISH LAW

İSVİÇRE VE TÜRK HUKUKUNDA ARACI SİMSARLIK SÖZLEŞMESİ BAKIMINDAN ÇİFTE SİMSARLIK FAALİYETİ YÜRÜTÜLMESİNİN HÜKÜM VE SONUÇLARI

Pages
143–173
Publication Date
2018-08-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this study is to examine first the brokerage contract of negotiation and then the cases which raises the conflict of interest between the both party of principal contract in case of double brokerage referring also to the sanction of the conflict of interests.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:<!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536859905 -1073732485 9 0 511 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:10.0pt; margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-ansi-language:EN-GB; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} .MsoPapDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; margin-bottom:10.0pt; line-height:115%;} @page WordSection1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt; mso-header-margin:35.4pt; mso-footer-margin:35.4pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;} --> Brokerage contract is defined as a contract whereby the broker is instructed to alert the principal to an opportunity to conclude a contract or to facilitate the conclusion of a contract in exchange of a fee according to the article 520 of the Turkish Code of Obligations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of this definition there are two kind of brokerage activity such as the brokerage activity where the broker is instructed to indicate the principal the opportunity to conclude a contract id. est. brokerage of indication and the brokerage activity where the broker is instructed to negotiate the conclusion of a contract id.est brokerage of negotiation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this study is to examine first the brokerage contract of negotiation and then the cases which raises the conflict of interest between the both party of principal contract in case of double brokerage referring also to the sanction of the conflict of interests.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Simsarlık sözleşmesi · aracı simsar · çifte simsarlık

Abstract

<!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536859905 -1073732485 9 0 511 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:10.0pt; margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-ansi-language:EN-GB; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} .MsoPapDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; margin-bottom:10.0pt; line-height:115%;} @page WordSection1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt; mso-header-margin:35.4pt; mso-footer-margin:35.4pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;} --> Brokerage contract is defined as a contract whereby the broker is instructed to alert the principal to an opportunity to conclude a contract or to facilitate the conclusion of a contract in exchange of a fee according to the article 520 of the Turkish Code of Obligations. As a result of this definition there are two kind of brokerage activity such as the brokerage activity where the broker is instructed to indicate the principal the opportunity to conclude a contract id. est. brokerage of indication and the brokerage activity where the broker is instructed to negotiate the conclusion of a contract id.est brokerage of negotiation. The contract which the broker is instructed to alert the principal to conclude or to facilitate the conclusion between the principal and the third party is defined as principal contract. If the broker acts simultaneously for the both party of principal contract, the activity of the broker is called double brokerage. The double brokerage may not cause any conflict of interests between the both party of the principal contract where the broker acts in order to indicate to each party the opportunity to conclude a contract according to Swiss case law and doctrine. However the situation differs whereby the broker acts in order to negotiate the conclusion of the principal contract for each party as a double broker. The aim of this study is to examine first the brokerage contract of negotiation and then the cases which raises the conflict of interest between the both party of principal contract in case of double brokerage referring also to the sanction of the conflict of interests.

Özet

<!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536859905 -1073732485 9 0 511 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:10.0pt; margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-ansi-language:EN-GB; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} .MsoPapDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; margin-bottom:10.0pt; line-height:115%;} @page WordSection1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt; mso-header-margin:35.4pt; mso-footer-margin:35.4pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;} --> Türk Borçlar Kanunu m. 520 uyarınca, simsarlık sözleşmesi, simsarın bir ücret karşılığında taraflar arasında bir sözleşmenin kurulmasına ya da kurulma imkânının hazırlanmasına aracılık etmeyi üstlendiği sözleşme olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Bu tanımdan hareketle simsarlık faaliyetinin, iş sahibinin sözleşme yapması imkânını hazırlayan fırsat gösterici simsarlık ile sözleşme kurulmasına aracılık etme şeklindeki aracı simsarlık şeklindeki iki türü vardır. Simsarın kurulması imkânını hazırladığı ya da aracılık ettiği iş sahibi ile üçüncü kişi arasında akdedilen sözleşme esas sözleşme olarak adlandırılır. Simsarın esas sözleşmenin her iki tarafı için de faaliyet göstermesi hâlinde çifte simsarlık söz konusu olur. İsviçre öğretisinde ve yargı kararlarında, fırsat gösterici simsarlığın esas sözleşmenin tarafları arasında menfaat çatışmasına neden olmadığı kabul edilmektedir. Ancak aracı simsarlık bakımından konu tartışmalıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, öncelikle aracı simsarlığı ele almaktır. Ardından taraflar arasında menfaat çatışması olması hâlinde kanunun öngördüğü yaptırım dikkate alınarak, aracı simsarlık faaliyetinin gerek iş sahibi gerekse esas sözleşmenin tarafı üçünü kişi için yürütülmesi durumunda menfaat çatışmasına neden olan hâller inceleme konusu yapılacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

APAYDIN, B. Ö. (2018). CONSEQUENCES OF DOUBLE BROKERAGE ACTIVITY IN CASE OF BROKERAGE CONTRACT OF NEGOTIATION IN SWISS AND TURKISH LAW. Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi, YBHD 2018/2, 143–173. https://ajindex.com/articles/171871

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ammann, Caterina (2015) ‘Der Mäklervertrag, Art. 412- 417’ Heinrich Honsell/ Nedim Peter Vogt/ Wolfgang Wiegang (Editörler) Basler Kommentar zum Schweizerischen Privatrecht, OR I, Art. 1-529, 6. Auflage, Helbing&Lichtenhahn, Basel-Genf-München. Antalya, Gökhan (2015)
  2. Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler, C:I, İstanbul.
  3. Arkan, Sabih (2011) Ticari İşletme Hukuku, 6102 Sayılı Türk Ticaret Kanununa Göre Hazırlanmış 15. Bası, Ankara.
  4. Başpınar, Veysel (2004) Vekilin Özen Borcu, 2. Bası, Ankara.
  5. Bilge, Necip (1962) Borçlar Hukuku-Özel Borç Münasebetleri, Ankara.
  6. Bozkurt, Tamer (2006) Türk Hukukunda Tellâllık ve Tellâllığın Uygulamada Farklı Görünümleri, Ankara.
  7. Bracher, Nicolas ʽArbeitsvertrag, Werkvertrag, Auftrag, GoA, Bürgschaft Art. 319-529 ORʼ Huguenin, Claire / Müller-Chen, Marcus (Editörler) (2016) Handkommentar zum Schweizer Privatrecht, Vertragverhältnisse Teil 2:, Shulthess Juristiche Medien AG, Zürich. Burkhalter, Peter R. (2016) ‘Art. 412-418’ Kostkiewicz Kren Jolanta/Wolf Stephan/Amstutz Marc/Fankhauser Roland (Editörler), Art. 412, OR Kommentar zum Schweizerisches Obligationenrecht, Orell Füssli Verlag, Zürich. Chappuis, Christine (2012) ‘Art.32-39 CO’ Thevenoz, Luc/ Werro, Franz (Editörler), Commentaire Romand, Code des Obligations, vol: I,, Art. 1-529
  8. CO, Loi sur le crédit à la consommation, Loi sur les voyages à forfait, 2e édition,, Helbing & Lichtenhahn Verlag, Bâle. Engel, Pierre (2000)
  9. Contrats de droit suisse, Traité des contrats de la partie spéciale du Code des obligations, de la vente au contrat de société simple, articles 184 à 551 CO, ainsi que quelques contrats innommés, 2. Bası, Stämpfli Verlag AG, Bern. Eren, Fikret (2017) Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 22. Bası, Ankara.
  10. Gautchi, Georg (1964) Berner Kommentar Band/Nr.VI/2/5, Kreditbrief und Kreditauftrag, Mäklervertrag, Agenturvertrag, Geshäftsführung ohne Auftrag, Art. 407-424
  11. Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch, Das Obligationenrecht, Die einzelnen Vertragverhältnisse, Stämpfli Verlag, Bern. Grell, Boris (2017) ‘Interdiction du double courtage de négociation dans les transactions immobiliéres’, TREX-L’expert fiduciare, s. 302-303.
  12. Guhl, Theo/Schnyder, Anton K., (2000) Das Schweizerische Obligationenrecht mit Einschluss des Handels-und Wertpapierrechts, Shulthess Juristiche Medien AG, Zürich. Güggenbühl, Adolf (1951) Die Liegenschaftenmäkelei, Zürich. Gümüş, Mustafa Alper (2014) 6098 sayılı Türk Borçlar Kanunu’na Göre Borçlar Hukuku Özel Hükümler, C: II, (Eser, Vekâlet, Simsarlık, Vekâletsiz