SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 5

THE EFFECTS OF INNOVATIVE CHARACTERISTICS ON ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING IMPLEMENTATION SUCCESS AND PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE

YENİLİKÇİ ÖZELLİKLERİN, KURUMSAL KAYNAK PLANLAMASI UYGULAMA BAŞARISINA VE ALGILANAN ORGANİZASYONEL PERFORMANS ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Gökhan ÖZER
Yaşar AKÇA
Pages
53–70
Publication Date
2007-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings obtained from 236 firms demonstrated that; 1 an increase in innovative characteristics increased the implementation success of ERP, 2 innovative characteristics had significant effects on organizational performance, 3 an increase in the implementation success of ERP increased the organizational performance significantly and 4 when the implementation success of ERP together with innovative characteristics were taken into consideration in explaining the organizational performance, the implementation success of ERP, technical compatibility and reengineering were significantly meaningful and total quality management had a negative value

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to define innovative characteristics which must be taken into consideration while implementing the enterprise resource planning ERP system in the organization and to analyze its effects on the implementation success of ERP and organizational performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to define innovative characteristics which must be taken into consideration while implementing the enterprise resource planning ERP system in the organization and to analyze its effects on the implementation success of ERP and organizational performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings obtained from 236 firms demonstrated that; 1 an increase in innovative characteristics increased the implementation success of ERP, 2 innovative characteristics had significant effects on organizational performance, 3 an increase in the implementation success of ERP increased the organizational performance significantly and 4 when the implementation success of ERP together with innovative characteristics were taken into consideration in explaining the organizational performance, the implementation success of ERP, technical compatibility and reengineering were significantly meaningful and total quality management had a negative value
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Teknik Uyumluluk · İş Süreçlerinin Yeniden Gözden Geçiril · Technical Compatibility

Abstract

The aim of this study is to define innovative characteristics which must be taken into consideration while implementing the enterprise resource planning ERP system in the organization and to analyze its effects on the implementation success of ERP and organizational performance. The findings obtained from 236 firms demonstrated that; 1 an increase in innovative characteristics increased the implementation success of ERP, 2 innovative characteristics had significant effects on organizational performance, 3 an increase in the implementation success of ERP increased the organizational performance significantly and 4 when the implementation success of ERP together with innovative characteristics were taken into consideration in explaining the organizational performance, the implementation success of ERP, technical compatibility and reengineering were significantly meaningful and total quality management had a negative value

Özet

Çalışmanın hedefi, kurumsal kaynak planlaması KKP sisteminin işletmeye kurulumunda dikkate alınması gereken yenilikçi özellikleri tanımlamak ve KKP uygulama başarısı ile organizasyonel performansa etkilerini analiz etmektir. 236 firmadan sağlanan verinin bulguları; 1 yenilikçi özelliklerdeki artışın KKP uygulama başarısını arttırdığını, 2 yenilikçi özelliklerin organizasyonel performans üzerinde anlamlı etkisinin olduğunu, 3 KKP uygulama başarısındaki artışın organizasyonel performansı anlamlı biçimde arttırdığını ve 4 organizasyonel performansın açıklanmasında yenilikçi özelliklerle birlikte KKP uygulama başarısı da dikkate alındığında, KKP uygulama başarısı, teknik uyumluluk ve iş süreçlerinin gözden geçirilmesinin anlamlı açıklama sağladığı, toplam kalite yönetiminin negatif değerde olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZER, G., AKÇA, Y. (2007). THE EFFECTS OF INNOVATIVE CHARACTERISTICS ON ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING IMPLEMENTATION SUCCESS AND PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 5, 53–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/170551

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ahadi, H.R. (2004), “An Examination of The Role of Organizational Enablers in Business Process Reengineering and The Impact of Information Technology,” Information Resources Management Journal, 17(4), pp. 1-19.
  2. Al-Mashari, M. (2001), “Process Orientation Through Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP): A Review of Critical Issues,” Knowledge and Process Management, 8(3), pp. 175-185.
  3. Ashill, N.J. ve D.Jobber (1999), “The Impact of Environmental Uncertainty Perceptions, Decision Maker Characteristics and Work Environment Characteristics on The Perceived Usefulness of Marketing Information Systems (MkIS): A Conceptual Framework,” Journal of Marketing Management, 15, pp. 519-540.
  4. Au, A.K. ve P.Enderwick (2000), “A Cognitive Model on Attitude Towards Technology Adoption,” Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15(4), pp. 266-282.
  5. Bingi, P. vd. (2001), “Critical Issues Affecting an ERP Implementation,” Enterprise Systems Integration, (Der.: J.M.Myerson), Auerbach Publishers Incorporated, Florida 2001, pp. 425-438. http://site.ebrary.com./lib/karaelmas/Doc?id=10075407&ppg=444, (Erişim Tarihi: 22.6.2006)
  6. Bradford, M. ve J.Florin (2003), “Examining The Role of Innovation Diffusion Factors on The Implementation Success of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems,” International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 4, pp. 205- 225. Burns, O. vd. (1991), “Critical Success Factors in Manufacturing Resource Planning Implementation,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 11(4), pp. 5-19.
  7. Calantone, R.J. vd (2002), “Learning Orientation, Firm Innovation Capability and Firm Performance,” Industrial Marketing Management, 31, pp. 515-524.
  8. Cronbach., L.J. (2004), “My Current Thoughts on Coefficient Alpha and Successor Procedures,” CSE Report 643, University of California, Los Angeles, pp. 1-32.
  9. Dale, B.G. ve C.L.Cooper (1994), “Introducing TQM: The Role of Senior Management,” Management Decision, 32(1), 1994, pp. 20-26.
  10. Damanpour, F. ve Evan, W.M. (1984), “Organizational Innovation and Performance: The Problem of Organizational Lag,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, pp. 392-409.
  11. Damanpour, F. ve S.Gopalakrishnan (1998), “Theories of Organizational Structure and Innovation Adoption: The Role of Environmental Change,” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15, pp. 1-24.
  12. DeLone, W.H. ve E.McLean (1992), “Information Systems Success: The Quest for The Dependent Variable,” Information System Research, 3(1), pp. 60-95.
  13. Earl, M.J. vd. (1995), “Strateg