Journals / Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 14

STATE OF BIG BUSINESSES: THE ROLE OF POLITICAL SYSTEM IN ECONOMIC GROWTH OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ÜYÜK İŞLETMELER DEVLETİ: KURULUŞ DÖNEMİ AMERİKAN EKONOMİK BÜYÜMESİNDE SİYASİ YAPININ ROLÜ

Pages
377–394
Publication Date
2011-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The pioneering role of federal system in that time caused private firms to become leading actors of the economy

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The growth of United States of America in the 19th century was a multidimensional experience that could be examined within the interaction of history, theory and institutions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The clash and conflict between different branches of federal system, federal, state and local governments, all contributed to the growth of economy at that era.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The pioneering role of federal system in that time caused private firms to become leading actors of the economy
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İktisadi büyüme ve devlet · 19. yüzyılda ABD’nin iktisadi büyümesi · federal yönetim ve iktisadi büyüme

Abstract

The growth of United States of America in the 19th century was a multidimensional experience that could be examined within the interaction of history, theory and institutions. The clash and conflict between different branches of federal system, federal, state and local governments, all contributed to the growth of economy at that era. Federal system, comprimising different interest groups, created a realm where both the sectors of agriculture and manufacturing found ways and means to flourish. In this regard, constitution, court system, political institutions and tradition of self-governance acted as a check and balance system that managed conflicts arose between different governing branches. Thus, the struggle over economy-politics of the country that lasted until the Civil War drove the growth of economy. The pioneering role of federal system in that time caused private firms to become leading actors of the economy

Özet

ABD’nin 19. yüzyılın ilk yarısında yaşadığı büyüme, tarihi süreç, teori ve kurumların etkileşimi çerçevesinde ele alınabilecek çok boyutlu bir tecrübedir. ABD federal yapısının organları olan federal hükümet, eyalet hükümetleri ve yerel idareler arasındaki yetki ve güç çekişmesi söz konusu dönem içerisinde ekonomik büyümeyi olumlu etkilemiştir. Federal sistem, farklı çıkar gruplarının ekonomik önceliklerini uzlaştırarak tarım ve imalat sektörünün birlikte geliştiği bir ekonomik büyüme zemini oluşturmuştur. Başta Anayasa ve yargı olmak üzere siyasi kurumlar ve yerinden yönetim geleneği, farklı hükümet organları arasındaki iktidar mücadelesinde hep bir denge unsuru görevi görmüş, İç Savaş’a kadar ABD’nin ekonomi politiğinin nasıl belirleneceğine ilişkin oluşan gerilim alanı ekonomik büyümeye olumlu katkı sağlamıştır. Kuruluşundan İç Savaş’a kadar olan dönem içerisinde federal sistemin ekonomik büyümede öncü rolü üstlenmesi işletmelerin ABD’nin ekonomik yapısında temel belirleyici konuma gelmeleri sonucunu doğurmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, M. L. (2011). STATE OF BIG BUSINESSES: THE ROLE OF POLITICAL SYSTEM IN ECONOMIC GROWTH OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 14, 377–394. https://ajindex.com/articles/170525

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abramovitz, Moses (1993), “The Search for Sources of Economic Growth: Areas of Ignorance, Old and New”, Journal of Economic History, 53, ss. 217-43.
  2. Abramovitz, M. ve David, P. A. (1996), “Convergence and Deferred Catch-up: Productivity Leadership and the Waning of American Exceptionalism,” Editörler: Ralph Landau, Timothy Taylor ve Gavin Wright, The Mosaic of Economic Growth, Stanford University Press, Stanford, s. 31. Akbay, Muvaffak (1950), “Amerika Birleşik Devletleri Anayasa Metinleri”, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 7, Sayı: 1-2, ss. 446-493.
  3. Anderson, Terry L. ve Hill, P. J. (1981), “Economic Growth in a Transfer Society: The United States Experience”, The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 41, No. 1, The Tasks of Economic History. Balam, Deborah A. (1993), “The Evolution of the Government Business Relationship in the United States: From Colonial Times to Present”, American Business Law Journal, Vol. 31, 1993, s. 592. Balogh, Brian (2009), A Government Out of Sight: The Mystery of National Authority in Nineteenth-Century America, Cambridge University Press,
  4. New York. Chandler, Alfred (1977), The Visible Hand: the Managerial Revolution in American Business, Harvard University Press,
  5. Cambridge. Cochran, Thomas (1981), Frontiers of Change: Early Industrialism in America, Oxford University Press,
  6. New York. David, Paul A. ve Wright, Gavin (1997), “The Genesis of American Resource Abundance,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 6, ss. 203-45.
  7. Davis, Lance E. ve North Douglas C. (1971), American Economic Growth and Institutional Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  8. Earle, Carville ve Hoffman, Ronald (1980), “The Foundation of the Modern Economy: Agriculture and the Costs of Labor in the United States and England, 1800-60”,
  9. The American Historical Review, Vol. 85, No. 5, ss. 1055-1094.
  10. Fishback, Price (2007), Government and the American Economy: A New History, University of Chicago Press,
  11. Chicago. Fishlow, Albert (1965), American Railroads and the Transformation of the Antebellum Economy, Harvard University Press,
  12. Cambridge. Gallman, Robert E. ve Wallis, John Joseph (1992), “Introduction to „American Economic Growth and Standards of Living before the Civil War‟”, Editörler: Robert E. Gallman ve John Joseph Wallis, American Economic Growth and Standards of Living before the Civil War içinde, University of Chicago Press,
  13. Chicago. Goodrich, Carter ve Segal Harvey H. (1953), “Baltimore‟s Aid to Railroads. A Study in the Municipal Planni