Journals / Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 9

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EXCHANGE RATE AND TRADE BALANCE: THE CASE OF TURKEY

DÖVİZ KURU-TİCARET DENGESİ İLİŞKİSİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Pages
35–57
Publication Date
2009-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results received through the ADF and PP unit root tests and the ARDL co-integration tests show that during the period in question, the Marshall-Lerner condition held and the empirical evidence provided by the Almon methodology supports the pattern of movement described by the J curve

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:According to the conventional theory, if the Marshall-Lerner condition is met, devaluation affects trade balance positively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the Marshall-Lerner condition and the J curve effect were questioned by using quarterly data in Turkey for the period 1989-2005.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results received through the ADF and PP unit root tests and the ARDL co-integration tests show that during the period in question, the Marshall-Lerner condition held and the empirical evidence provided by the Almon methodology supports the pattern of movement described by the J curve
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Marshall-Lerner Koşulu · J Eğrisi · Almon Modeli

Abstract

According to the conventional theory, if the Marshall-Lerner condition is met, devaluation affects trade balance positively. However, as a result of the J curve effect, the effects can be negative in the short run. Although there are many studies which question these effects, they do not share a consistent conclusion. In this study, the Marshall-Lerner condition and the J curve effect were questioned by using quarterly data in Turkey for the period 1989-2005. The results received through the ADF and PP unit root tests and the ARDL co-integration tests show that during the period in question, the Marshall-Lerner condition held and the empirical evidence provided by the Almon methodology supports the pattern of movement described by the J curve

Özet

Geleneksel teori uzun dönemde Marshall-Lerner şartı gerçekleştiğinde devalüasyonun ticaret dengesini olumlu yönde etkileyeceğini fakat kısa dönemde J eğrisi etkisinden dolayı bu etkilerin negatif yönde olabileceğini ileri sürmektedir. Fakat gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülkeler üzerine yapılan pek çok çalışmada bu şartın ve/veya J eğrisi etkilerinin gerçekleştiği yönünde bir tutarlılık bulunmamaktadır. Bu çalışma ile Türkiye’de 1989-2005 dönemi içerisinde çeyrek yıllık veriler kullanılarak Marshall-Lerner koşulunun sağlanıp sağlanmadığı ve kısa dönemde J eğrisi etkisinin geçerliliği birlikte incelenmiştir. ADF ve PP birim kök testleri ve ARDL koentegrasyon testlerinden sonra yapılan tahminlerde, incelenen dönemde, Marshall-Lerner koşulunun sağlandığı ve Almon çok terimli model kullanılarak yapılan tahminde de J eğrisi etkisinin Türkiye için geçerli olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

VERGİL, H., ERDOĞAN, S. (2009). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EXCHANGE RATE AND TRADE BALANCE: THE CASE OF TURKEY. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 9, 35–57. https://ajindex.com/articles/170507

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akbostancı, Elif (2002), “Dynamics of the Trade Balance: The Turkish J- Curve”, ERC Working Papers in Economics, Cilt 1, Sayı 5, s. 1-19.
  2. Algieri, Bernardina (2004), “Price and Income Elasticities of Russian Exports”, The European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cilt 1, Sayı 2, s. 175-193.
  3. Altınok, Serdar ve Murat Çetinkaya (2002), “Devalüasyon ve Türkiye’de Devalüasyon Uygulamaları ve Sonuçları”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Sayı 9, s. 47-64.
  4. Arize, Augustine C. (1994), “Cointegration Test of a Long Run Relation Between the Real Effective Exchange Rate and the Trade Balance”, International Economic Journal, Cilt 8, Sayı 3, s. 1-9.
  5. Artus, Jacques. R ve Anne Kenny McGuirk (1981), “A Revised Version of the Multilateral Exchange Rate Model”, IMF Staff Papers, 28, 275- 309. Artus, Jacques. R ve Malcolm. D. Knight (1984), “Issues in the Assessment of the Exchange Rates of Industrial Countries”, Occasional Paper 29, IMF. Aydoğuş, İsmail ve Jülide Yıldırım (2001), “Kur Politikası ve Ticaret Dengesi: Türkiye Örneği”, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, Cilt 3, Sayı 1, s. 155-165.
  6. Backus, K.David, Patrick J.Kehoe ve Finn E. Kydland (1994), “Dynamics of the Trade Balance and the Terms of Trade: The J-Curve?”, The American Review, Cilt 84, Sayı 1, s. 84-103.
  7. Bahmani-Oskoee, Mohsen (1985), “Devaluation and the J-Curve: Some Evidence from LDC’s”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Cilt 67, Sayı 3, s. 500-504.
  8. Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen ve Farhang Niroomand (1998), “Long Run Price Elasticities and the Marshall-Lerner Condition Revisited”, Economics Letters, Cilt 61, s. 101-109.
  9. Bahmani-Oskoee, Mohsen Mohsen and Artatrana Rahta (2004), “ The J- Curve: A Literature Review”, Applied Economics, Cilt 36, 1377-1398.
  10. Brada, C.Josef, Ali M.Kutan ve Su Zhou (1997), “The Exchange Rate and the Balance of Trade: The Turkish Experience”, The Journal of Development Studies, Cilt 33, Sayı 5, s. 675-692.
  11. Bickerdike, C. F. (1920), “The Instability of Foreign Exchanges”, The Economic Journal, March. Case, Karl E. ve Ray C. Fair (2004), Principles of Macroeconomics, 7th Edition,
  12. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. Chacholiades, Miltiades (1990),
  13. International Economics, Mc Graw Hill Pres, Singapore. Chinn, Menzie David ve Jeawoo Lee (2002),”Current Account and Real Exchange Rate Dynamics in the G-7 Countries”, IMF Working Paper, (#WP/02/130). Doğanlar, Murat, Harun Bal ve Mehmet Özmen (2003), “Uluslararası Ticaret ve Türkiye’nin İhracat Fonksiy