Journals / Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 21

THE EFFECT OF MONETARY POLICY ON BANKS RISK TAKING IN TURKEY

TÜRKİYE’DE PARA POLİTİKALARININ BANKALARIN RİSK YÜKLENİMLERİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİ

Pages
1–17
Publication Date
2014-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, the magnitude of this effect increases as the scales of the banks get smaller

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In periods of expansionary monetary policies, the effects of declines in interest rates on valuations, income and cash flows increase the risk taking behavior of banks..
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, our study investigates whether the implementation of monetary policy in 2002Q4-2012Q3 period in Turkey affects the risk taking behavior of banks or not by using dynamic panel data framework.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, the magnitude of this effect increases as the scales of the banks get smaller
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Para Politikası · Geri Dönmeyen Krediler · Risk Yüklenim Kanalı

Abstract

In periods of expansionary monetary policies, the effects of declines in interest rates on valuations, income and cash flows increase the risk taking behavior of banks.. In this context, our study investigates whether the implementation of monetary policy in 2002Q4-2012Q3 period in Turkey affects the risk taking behavior of banks or not by using dynamic panel data framework. According to our results, there is a positive relationship between the changes in short-term interest rates and banks’ risk taking. The result reflects that a decrease in short term interest rates has a positive impact on the loan portfolio via outstanding loans. In other words, banks’ risk taking decreases if interest rates are lowered. However, was found negative relationship between the interest rate, which falls below benchmark level and banks’ risk taking. According to the results, the magnitude of this effect increases as the scales of the banks get smaller

Özet

Genişletici para politikalarının uygulandığı dönemlerde faiz oranlarında meydana gelen düşüşlerin değerlemeler, gelirler ve nakit akımları üzerindeki etkileri, bankaların risk yüklenimlerini kolaylaştırmaktadır. Bu kapsamda çalışmamızda 2002Q4-2012Q3 döneminde Türkiye’de uygulanan para politikalarının bankaların risk yüklenimlerini etkileyip etkilemediği dinamik panel yaklaşımı ile araştırılmaktadır. Çalışma sonuçlarımıza göre, kısa vadeli faiz oranlarındaki değişim ile bankaların risk yüklenimleri arasında pozitif yönlü bir ilişki vardır. Bu sonuç, düşük faiz oranlarının bankaların kredi portföyleri üzerindeki -henüz geri ödemesi yapılmamış krediler vasıtasıyla gerçekleşen- pozitif yönlü etkilerini yansıtmaktadır. Bununla birlikte faiz oranlarının denge değerin altına düşmesi ile bankaların risk yüklenimleri arasınd ise negatif yönlü bir ilişki tespit edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre bu etkinin büyüklüğü banka ölçeği küçüldükçe artmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKLAN, N. A., AKAY, H. K., ÇINAR, M. (2014). THE EFFECT OF MONETARY POLICY ON BANKS RISK TAKING IN TURKEY. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 21, 1–17. https://ajindex.com/articles/170473

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Adrian, T., & Shin, H. S. (2010). Liquidity and leverage. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 19, 418–437.
  2. Agenor, P. R., & Silva, L. (2012). Macroeconomic stability, financial stability, and monetary policy rules. International Finance, 15(2), 205-224.
  3. Altunbaş, Y., Gambacorta, L., & David, M. I. (2010). Does monetary policy affect bank risk- taking? ECB Working Paper Series, 1166. Altunbaş, Y., Fazylov, O., & Molyneux, P. (2002). Evidence on the bank lending channel in Europe. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26 (11), 2093-2210.
  4. Apel, M., & Claussen, C. (2012). Monetary policy, interest rate and risk-taking. Sveriges Riksbank Economic Review, 2, 68-83.
  5. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297.
  6. Bernanke, B. (2010). Emerging from the crisis: Where do we stand? A speech at the sixth ECB Conference, Frankfurt. Bernanke, B., & Blinder, A. S. (1988). Credit, money and aggregate demand. American Economic Review, 78 (2), 435-439.
  7. Borio, C. (2005). Monetary and financial stability: So close and yet so far? National Institute Economic Review, 192. 84-101.
  8. Borio, C., & Zhu, H. (2012). Capital regulation, risk-taking and monetary policy: A missing link in the transmission mechanism? Journal of Financial Stability, 8 236–251.
  9. Brissimis, S. N., & Delis, M. D. (2010). Bank heterogeneity and monetary policy transmission. ECB Working Paper, 1233. Buch, C. M., Eickmeier S., & Prieto, E. (2010). Macroeconomic factors and micro-level bank risk. CESifo Working Paper, 3194. De Nicolo, G., Dell’Ariccia, G., Laeven, L., & Valencia, F. (2010). Monetary policy and bank risk taking. IMF Staff Position Note, SPN/10/09. Delis M. D. & Kouretas G. P. (2011).
  10. Interest rates and bank risk taking, Journal of Banking and Finance, 35, 840-855. Dell’ Ariccia, G., & Marquez, R. (2006). Lending booms and lending standarts. Journal of Finance, 61, 2511-2546. Dell’Ariccia, G., Laeven, L., & Marquez, R. (2010). Monetary policy, leverage, and bank risk- taking. International Monetary Fund Working Paper, 10/276 Dokko, J., Doyle, B., Kiley, M. T., Kim, J., Sherlund, S., Sim, J., & Skander, V. H. (2011). Monetary policy and the housing bubble. Economic Policy, 26, 237-287.
  11. Fiordelisi, F., Marques-Ibanez, D., & Molyneux, P. (2010). Efficiency and risk in european banking. European Central Bank Working Paper Series 1211. Gaggl, P., & Valderrama, M. T. (2010). Does