SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 7

EFFECTS OF INSTITUTIONALIZATION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF SMALL AND MEDIUM SIZE FIRMS

Kurumsallaşmanın Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli İşletmelerin Performansına Etkileri

Fahri APAYDIN
Pages
119–143
Publication Date
2008-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Some of the results of the analyses support the researches in the literature

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this research, effects of institutionalization on the performance of small and medium size firms are searched.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Effectiveness, efficiency, and innovation and adaptability are examined as performance dimensions of firms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Some of the results of the analyses support the researches in the literature
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kurumsallaşma · Performans · İşlevsel Performans

Abstract

In this research, effects of institutionalization on the performance of small and medium size firms are searched. The dimensions of institutionalization are proposed as formalization, autonomy, professionalization, cultural strength, transparency, social responsibility and consistency. Effectiveness, efficiency, and innovation and adaptability are examined as performance dimensions of firms. The relations between the concepts are hypothesized and tested using the data obtained from small and medium sized companies in different industries in Turkey with questionnaire forms and some regression analyses have been conducted to test the hypotheses. Some of the results of the analyses support the researches in the literature

Özet

Bu araştırmada kurumsallaşmanın küçük ve orta ölçekli işletmelerin performansına etkileri incelenmektedir. Kurumsallaşma kavramının unsurları olarak formalleşme, otonomi, profesyonelleşme, kültürel güç, saydamlık, sosyal sorumluluk ve tutarlılık önerilmektedir. İşletme performansı olarak işlevsel performans, çıktı performansı ve yenilik ve uyum sağlama performansı incelenmektedir. Araştırmadaki kavramlar arasındaki ilişkiler hipotezlendirilmiş ve bunları test etmek için Türkiye’de farklı sektörlerdeki küçük ve orta ölçekli işletmelerden anket yöntemiyle veriler elde edilerek, regrasyon yöntemiyle çeşitli analizler yapılmıştır. Analizlerin sonuçlarından elde edilen bulgular, literatürdeki araştırmaları kısmen desteklemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

APAYDIN, F. (2008). EFFECTS OF INSTITUTIONALIZATION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF SMALL AND MEDIUM SIZE FIRMS. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 7, 119–143. https://ajindex.com/articles/170361

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Begley, T. M. ve D. P. Boyd (1987), “Psychological Characteristics Associated with Performance in Entrepreneurial Firms and Smaller Businesses”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 2, pp. 79-93.
  2. Cavuşgil, S. T. ve S. Zou (1994), “Marketing Strategy–Performance Relationship: An Investigation of the Empirical Link in Export Market Ventures”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 1-21.
  3. Chakravarthy, B. S. (1986), “Measuring Strategic Performance”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 437-458.
  4. Cohen, A. ve Y. Kol (2004), “Professionalism and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: An Empirical Examination among Israeli Nurses”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 386-405.
  5. Covin, J. G. ve T. Covin (1990), “Competitive Aggressiveness, Environmental Context, and Small Firm Performance”, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 35-50.
  6. Dando, N. ve T. Swift (2003), “Transparency and Assurance: Minding the Credibility Gap”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 44, No. 2/3, pp. 195-200.
  7. Davis, G. F. (1991), “Agents without Principles? The Spread of the Poison Pill through the Intercorporate Network”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 36, pp. 583-613.
  8. Day, G. S. (1994), “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, No. 4, pp. 37-52.
  9. Dekimpe, M. G. ve D. M. Hanssens (1999), “Sustained Spending and Persistent Response: A New Look at Long-Term Marketing Profitability”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 397-412.
  10. Denison, D. R. (1990), Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness, New York: Wiley. Deshpande, R., J. U. Farley ve F. E. WEBSTER, JR. (1993), “Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 23-37.
  11. DiMaggio, P. J. ve W. W. Powell (1983), “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields”, in W. W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (Ed.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis: 1991, pp. 63-82. University of Chicago Press:
  12. Chicago. Ergün, E., E. Eren, L. Alpkan, C. Yılmaz ve R. Kaynak (2003), “Moderating Effects of Market Dynamism on the Relationship between Basic Cultural Assumptions and Firm Performance”, The Global Business and Technology Association. Frazier, G. L. (1999), “Organizing and Managing Channels of Distribution”, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 226-240. Gatignon,