SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 13

THE INTERACTION OF MONEY AND FİSCAL POLITICALS: THE NEW CONCENSUS

PARA VE MALİYE POLİTİKALARININ ETKİLEŞİMİ MESELESİ: YENİ UZLAŞI

Asuman KOÇ YURTKUR
Pages
812–823
Publication Date
2017-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, the theoretical position and the importance of fiscal policy in the framework of the New Consensus is discussed, taking into account the fact that macroeconomic policy can provide successful results in addition to monetary policy as well as fiscal policy

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Developments in macroeconomic policy since the 1990s have turned fiscal policy off, both theoretically and practically, while monetary policy is at the forefront.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The monetary policy adopts inflation targeting by focusing on the adjustment of the interest rate as the main policy instrument, and the use of the monetary policy is the subject of inflation targeting.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, the theoretical position and the importance of fiscal policy in the framework of the New Consensus is discussed, taking into account the fact that macroeconomic policy can provide successful results in addition to monetary policy as well as fiscal policy
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Para Politikası · Maliye Politikası · Yeni Uzlaşı

Abstract

Developments in macroeconomic policy since the 1990s have turned fiscal policy off, both theoretically and practically, while monetary policy is at the forefront. The monetary policy adopts inflation targeting by focusing on the adjustment of the interest rate as the main policy instrument, and the use of the monetary policy is the subject of inflation targeting. At this point, the question of why monetary policy has become so effective becomes important, and the role of fiscal policy needs to be investigated by repositioning the fiscal policy. Post Keynesian economists refer to fiscal policy as an important instrument to be used in macroeconomic policy in the context of the New Consensus and criticize the choice of short-term real interest rates as the sole policy instrument. In this study, the theoretical position and the importance of fiscal policy in the framework of the New Consensus is discussed, taking into account the fact that macroeconomic policy can provide successful results in addition to monetary policy as well as fiscal policy

Özet

Makroekonomi politikasında 1990’lı yıllardan itibaren yaşanan gelişmeler, hem teorik açıdan hem de uygulama açısından para politikasını ön plana çıkarırken maliye politikasını devre dışı bırakmaktadır. Para politikası ana politika aracı olarak faiz oranının ayarlanmasına odaklanarak enflasyon hedeflenmesini benimsemektedir. Bu noktada para politikasının neden bu denli etkin hale geldiği sorusu önemli hale gelmekte ve maliye politikasına yeniden yer verilerek maliye politikasının rolünün araştırılması gerekmektedir. Post Keynesyen İktisatçılar Yeni Uzlaşı çerçevesinde maliye politikasından, makroekonomi politikasında kullanılacak önemli bir araç olarak bahsetmekte ve tek politika aracı olarak kısa dönemli reel faiz oranlarının seçilmesini eleştirmektedirler. Bu çalışmada makroekonomik politikanın başarılı sonuçlar verebilmesinin para politikasının yanı sıra maliye politikasına da yer vermekten geçtiği düşüncesinden hareketle Yeni Uzlaşı çerçevesinde maliye politikasının teorik olarak yeri ve önemi ele alınmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YURTKUR, A. K. (2017). THE INTERACTION OF MONEY AND FİSCAL POLITICALS: THE NEW CONCENSUS. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 13, 812–823. https://ajindex.com/articles/169984

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Agénor, P. (2002). Monetary policy under flexible exchange rates: an introduction to inflation targeting. in N. Loayza&N. Soto (eds.), Inflation Targeting: Design, Performance, Challenges, Central Bank of Chile: Santiego, Chile. Alesina, Alberto, Carlo Favero & Francesco Giavazzi. (2012). The Output Effect of Fiscal Consolodation. CPER Working Paper, No: 450. Alonso Gonzalez, L. A., & Palacio-Vera, A. (2002).
  2. Monetary policy, Taylor's rule and instability. 53(1), 1-24. Allsopp C. & Vines D. (2005). The Macroeconomic Role of Fiscal Policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(4), 485-508. Arestis Philip & Biefang-Frisancho Mariscal, I. (2000).
  3. Capital Stock, Unemployment and Wages in the UK and Germany. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 47(5), 487-503.
  4. Arestis, P., & Sawyer, M. (2002). The Nature and Role of Monetary Policy When Money ıs Endogenous. The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, Working Paper No. 374. Arestis, P., & Sawyer, M. (2003). Reinventing fiscal policy. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 26(1), 3-25.
  5. Arestis, P., & Sawyer, M. (2004a). Fiscal Policy: A Potent Instrument. New School Economic Review, 1(1), 15- 21. Arestis, P., & Sawyer, M. (2004b). On the Effectiveness of Monetary Policy and of Fiscal Policy. Review of Social Economy, 62: 4, 441-463.
  6. Arestis, P. (2007). What is the New Consensus in Macroeconomics. P. Arestis (Ed.), Is There a New Consensus in Macroeconomics? (USA: Palgrave Macmillan). Arestis, P. (2008). The Effectiveness of Fiscal Policy in the Stock/Flow Levy Model. The Levy Economics Institute of Bard Collage. Arestis, P. (2011). Fiscal Policy is Still an Effective Instrument of Macroeconomic Policy. Panoeconomicus, 12 April, 143-156.
  7. Ascari, G. & Neikl R. (2008). Taylor Rules Cause Fiscal Policy Ineffectiveness. Society for Economic Dynamics, No.632. Bas van A. & Harry G. (2003).
  8. Keynesian, Non-Keynesian or No effects of Fiscal Policy Changes? The EMU Case. Journal of Macroeconomics, 25(2), 213-240.
  9. Bernanke, B. (2002). Deflation: Making Sure ‘It’ Doesn't Happen Here. Remarks before the National Economists Club, Washington, D.C. November 21. Blanchard, O. J. (1985).
  10. Debt, Deficits and Finite Horizons. Journal of Political Economy, 93, 223-247.
  11. Blanchard O. (2000). What Do We Know about Macroeconomics that Fisher and Wicksell Did Not?. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4), 1375-1409.
  12. Blanchard, O., & Perotti, R. (2002). An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending an