Journals / Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 13

DETERMINING THE PRIORITIES OF MAIN FACTORS THAT EFFECTS OCCUPATIONAL STRESS: A UNIVERSITY APPLICATION

MESLEKİ STRESTE ETKİLİ ANA FAKTÖRLERİN ÖNEM DERECELERİNİN BELİRLENMESİ: BİR ÜNİVERSİTEDE UYGULAMA

Pages
962–974
Publication Date
2017-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this sense, the priorities of stress components of academic and administrative staff working at Bülent Ecevit University was tried to be determined by AHP Analytical Hierarchy Process method and the differences between the priorities of stress components according to individual characteristics were investigated with statistical tests

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Stress is a prominent productivity component that affects employees' health and therefore performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Strategic decisions and policies can be taken after the stressing elements and levels of importance are identified in the organization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this sense, the priorities of stress components of academic and administrative staff working at Bülent Ecevit University was tried to be determined by AHP Analytical Hierarchy Process method and the differences between the priorities of stress components according to individual characteristics were investigated with statistical tests
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mesleki stres · stresör · AHP

Abstract

Stress is a prominent productivity component that affects employees' health and therefore performance. Managers who want to maximize the benefit of human resources must clarify the components of stress sources stressors seen in their organizations. So, they can perform their best managerial activities. Strategic decisions and policies can be taken after the stressing elements and levels of importance are identified in the organization. This will ensure a much higher level of efficiency than employees. The originality of this study is increased since there is no study which determines the priorities of occupational stress components, detected in the related literature. The purpose of this study is determining the priorities of the main stress components observed in the related literature for the public personnel. In this sense, the priorities of stress components of academic and administrative staff working at Bülent Ecevit University was tried to be determined by AHP Analytical Hierarchy Process method and the differences between the priorities of stress components according to individual characteristics were investigated with statistical tests

Özet

Stres, çalışanların sağlığını ve dolayısıyla performansını etkileyen temel verimlilik unsurlarındandır. İnsan kaynağından maksimum düzeyde faydalanmak isteyen yöneticiler, örgütlerinde görülen stres kaynaklarındaki stresörleri etkili unsurları netleştirebilirler. Böylece en iyi yönetsel faaliyetleri gerçekleştirebilirler. Örgütte stres yaratan unsurlar ve önem düzeyleri belirlendikten sonra stratejik karar ve politikalar alınabilir. Böylece çalışanlardan çok daha yüksek düzeyde verim alınması sağlanabilecektir. Literatürde mesleki stres unsurlarının önem derecesini belirlemeye yönelik bir çalışmaya rastlanmamış olması bu çalışmanın özgünlüğünü arttırmaktadır. Çalışmanın amacı, devlet kurumunda çalışan personelin literatürde gözlemlenen ana stres unsurlarının önem derecelerini belirlemektir. Bu anlamda, Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi’nde çalışan akademik ve idari personelin stres unsurlarının önem dereceleri AHP Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci yöntemiyle belirlenmeye çalışılmış ve bireylerin özelliklerine göre stres unsurlarının önem dereceleri arasındaki farklıklar istatistiksel testlerle araştırılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAVAN, Ö., PEKKAYA, M. (2017). DETERMINING THE PRIORITIES OF MAIN FACTORS THAT EFFECTS OCCUPATIONAL STRESS: A UNIVERSITY APPLICATION. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 13, 962–974. https://ajindex.com/articles/169978

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Annamalai, S., & Nandagopal, R.( 2014). Occupational stress. New Delhi: Allied Publishers Pvt. Ltd. Aydın, A., Üçüncü, K., & Taşdemir, T. (2011). Akademik performansı etkileyen stres kaynaklarının belirlenmesine yönelik bir alan çalışması. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(2), 387-399.
  2. Aydın, Ş. (2004). Örgütsel stres yönetimi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(3), 49- Babatunde, A. (2013). Occupational stress: A review on conceptualisations, causes and cure, Economic Insights – Trends and Challenges, II (LXV) (3/2013), 73–80.
  3. BEÜ (2017). Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi 2016 Faaliyet Raporu. http://w3.beun.edu.tr /dosyalar/2017/04/tek/beu- yili-faaliyet-raporu.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 20.11.2017).
  4. Bowen, P., Edwards, P., Lingard, H., & Cattell, K. (2014). Occupational stress and job demand, control and support factors among construction project consultants, International Journal of Project Management, 32 (2014), 1273-1284.
  5. Boxenbaum, E., & Rouleau, L. (2011). New knowledge products as bricolage: Metaphors and scripts in organizational theory. Academy of Management Review, 36 (2), 272–296.
  6. Boyd, N. G., Lewin, J.E., & Sager, J.K. (2009). A model of stress and coping and their influence on individual and organizational outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior,75 (2009), 197–211.
  7. Chandra, A., & Baldev, R. S. (2010). Predictors of occupational stress: An exploratory study. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 46 (2), 300-312.
  8. Chen, Wei-Qing vd. (2003). Determinants of perceived occupational stress among Chinese offshore oil workers. Work & Stress, 17(4), 287-305.
  9. Crawford, J. O., & Bolas, S. M. (1996). Sick building syndrome, work factors and occupational stress. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 22 (4), 243-250.
  10. Culnan, M. J., O'Reilly III, C.A., & Chatman, J.A. (1990). Intellectual structure of research in organizational behavior, 1972-1984: A cocitation anaiysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, (6):453-458.
  11. Danna, K., & Griffin, R.W. (1999). A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Management, 25(3), 357–384. Health and well-being in the workplace: Demirel, E.T. (2013). Mesleki stresin iş tatminine etkisi: Örgütsel desteğin aracılık rolü. Niğde Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 6(1), 220-241.
  12. Dhar, U. (1991). Organizational stress: Concept, determinants and management. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 26(3), 278-289.
  13. Dodd, F. J., Donegan, H.A. & McMaster, T.B.M. (1993). A sta