SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 24

MODERATOR EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL UNCERTAINTY ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ECOLOGIC INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE

EKOLOJİK YENİLİK İLE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK PERFORMANSI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE ÇEVRESEL BELİRSİZLİĞİN MODERATÖR ETKİSİ

Sibel YILDIZ ÇANKAYA
Bülent SEZEN
Pages
111–134
Publication Date
2015-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The moderator effect of environmental uncertainty was found only between eco-process innovation and sustainability dimensions

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article aims to investigate the effect of ecologic innovation eco-innovation practices on sustainability performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research was conducted through face-to-face and e-mail surveys on 281 manufacturing enterprises which operate in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The moderator effect of environmental uncertainty was found only between eco-process innovation and sustainability dimensions
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Eko-Yenilik · Sürdürülebilirlik · Hiyerarşik Regresyon Analizi

Abstract

This article aims to investigate the effect of ecologic innovation eco-innovation practices on sustainability performance. At the same time, it investigates the moderator role of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between these variables. The research was conducted through face-to-face and e-mail surveys on 281 manufacturing enterprises which operate in Turkey. In this study, eco-innovation is discussed in two dimensions as of being eco-product innovation and eco-process innovation. It is found that both of these dimensions have positive relationship with environmental, economic and social performance dimensions of sustainability. The moderator effect of environmental uncertainty was found only between eco-process innovation and sustainability dimensions

Özet

Bu makale ekolojik yenilik eko-yenilik uygulamalarının sürdürülebilirlik performansı üzerindeki etkisini araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Aynı zamanda bu değişkenler arasındaki ilişkide çevresel belirsizliğin düzenleyici moderatör rolü incelenmektedir. Araştırma Türkiye’de faaliyet gösteren 281 imalat işletmeleri üzerinde yüz yüze ve e-posta anketleri aracılığıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada eko-yenilik eko-ürün yeniliği ve eko-süreç yeniliği olarak iki boyutta ele alınmıştır. Her iki boyutun da sürdürülebilirliğin üç boyutu olan çevre, ekonomik ve sosyal performansla pozitif yönde ilişkisi olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Çevresel belirsizliğin moderatör etkisinin ise sadece eko-süreç yeniliği ve sürdürülebilirlik boyutları arasında olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇANKAYA, S. Y., SEZEN, B. (2015). MODERATOR EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL UNCERTAINTY ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ECOLOGIC INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 24, 111–134. https://ajindex.com/articles/169964

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S., & Yıldırım, E. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri SPSS uygulamaları. Sakarya: Sakarya Yayıncılık. Ar, L.M. (2012). The impact of green product innovation on firm performance and competitive capability: the moderating role of managerial environmental concern. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 854-864.
  2. Armstrong, J.S., & Overton, T.S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396-402.
  3. Arundel, A., & Kemp, R. (2009). Measuring eco-innovation. United Nations University Working Paper Series, (2009/017), 1-40.
  4. Atalay, M., Anafarta, N., & Sarvan, F. (2013). The relationship between innovation and firm performance: An empirical evidence from Turkish automotive supplier industry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75, 226-235.
  5. Azapagic, A., & Perdan, S.(2000). Indicators of sustainable development for industry: A general framework. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 78(4), 243-261.
  6. Azapagic, A. (2003). Systems approach to corporate sustainability a general management framework. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 81(5), 303-316.
  7. Baldridge, J. V., & Burnham, R. A. (1975). Organizational innovation: Individual, organizational and environmental impacts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 165-176.
  8. Bansal, P.(2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (3), 197- 218. Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173- 1182. Baş, T. (2001). Anket. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık ve San. ve Tic. Aş. Bayram, N. (2010).Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş amos uygulamaları. 1.Baskı, Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi.
  9. Berthon, P., Ewing, M., & Hah, L. L. (2005). Captivating company: Dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding. International Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 151-172.
  10. Besler, S. (2009). Yönetim yaklaşımlarıyla kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik. 1. Basım, İstanbul:
  11. Beta Basım. Bos-Brouwers, H.E.J. (2010). Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: Evidence of themes and activities in practice. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(7), 417– 435. Buvik, A., & Gronhaug, K. (2000). Inter-firm dependence, environmental uncertainty and vertical co-ordination in industrial buyer-seller rela