SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 29

THE ROLE OF INFORMAL COMMUNICATION WITH ACADEMIC STAFF ON LEADERSHIP CAHARACTERISTICS OF BUSINESS STUDENTS

İŞLETME ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN LİDERLİK ÖZELLİKLERİ ÜZERİNDE ÖĞRETİM ELEMANLARI İLE KURULAN İNFORMAL İLETİŞİMİN ROLÜ

Ali Murat ALPARSLAN
Orhan SEZGİN
Pages
89–103
Publication Date
2016-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Additionally, performed mediation analysis; a part of effect of social communication to leadership characteristics could be explained by psychological mentoring

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this research is to examine the relationship between the leadership characteristics of informal communication between business students and academic staff 586 business students from 4 grand state universities in Istanbul participated to research.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the findings; socially accessible of academic staff β = 0.10, t = 2.19 , psychological mentoring to students β = 0.47, t = 9.54 increase social communication between student and teaching academic staff.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Additionally, performed mediation analysis; a part of effect of social communication to leadership characteristics could be explained by psychological mentoring
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sosyal Erişilebilirlik · Mentorlük · İnformal İletişim

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine the relationship between the leadership characteristics of informal communication between business students and academic staff 586 business students from 4 grand state universities in Istanbul participated to research. In study, survey method is performed and confirmatory factor analysis, correlation and regression analyzes was carried on data. According to the findings; socially accessible of academic staff β = 0.10, t = 2.19 , psychological mentoring to students β = 0.47, t = 9.54 increase social communication between student and teaching academic staff. Increased social communication has a positive effect β = 0.42, t = 7.80 on students’ leadership characteristics self-esteem, have an impact on others, taking initiative, self-expression, dominant among others . Additionally, performed mediation analysis; a part of effect of social communication to leadership characteristics could be explained by psychological mentoring

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, işletme öğrencilerinin öğretim elemanları ile aralarındaki informal iletişimin liderlik özellikleri ile ilişkisini incelemektir. Araştırmaya, İstanbul’da bulunan 4 köklü devlet üniversitesinden 586 işletme öğrencisi katılmıştır. Veriler üzerinde doğrulayıcı faktör analizi, korelasyon ve regresyon analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bulgulara göre öğretim elemanlarının sosyal erişilebilirliği β=0.10, t=2.19 , ve öğrencilere sağladıkları psikolojik mentörlük β=0.47, t=9.54 öğrenci-öğretim elemanı arasındaki sosyal iletişimi artırmaktadır. Artan sosyal iletişim de öğrencilerin liderlik özelliklerine özgüven, diğerleri üzerinde etkili olma, inisiyatif alma, kendini ifade etme, diğerleri yanında baskın olma olumlu etkide bulunmaktadır β=0.42, t=7.80 . Ayrıca yapılan aracılık testi ile; sosyal iletişimin liderlik özellikleri üzerine etkisinin bir kısmının psikolojik mentörlük ile açıklanabilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALPARSLAN, A. M., SEZGİN, O. (2016). THE ROLE OF INFORMAL COMMUNICATION WITH ACADEMIC STAFF ON LEADERSHIP CAHARACTERISTICS OF BUSINESS STUDENTS. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 29, 89–103. https://ajindex.com/articles/169877

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Adair, J. (2007). Develop your leadership skills. London: Kogan Page Limited. Allen, T.D., Eby, L.T., & Lentz, E. (2006). Mentorship behaviors and mentorship quality associated with formal mentoring programs: Closing the gap between research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 567–578.
  2. Andersen, J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D. Nimmo (Ed.) Communication yearbook, 3, 543-560.
  3. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books. Aylor, B., & Oppliger, P. A. (2003). Out-of-class communication and student perceptions of instructor humor orientation and socio-communicative style. Communication Education, 52, 122-134.
  4. Bippus, A. M., Brooks, C. F., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (2001). Students’ perceptions of part-time andtenured/tenure-track faculty: Accessibility, mentoring, and extra-class communication. Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 30, 13–23.
  5. Cayanus, J. L., & Martin, M. M. (2004). An instructor self-disclosure scale. Communication Research Reports, 21, 252-263.
  6. Dobransky, N. D., & Frymier, A. B. (2004). Developing teacher-student relationships throughout of class communication. Communication Quarterly, 52, 211-223.
  7. Frymier, A. B., & Weser, B. (2001). The role of student predispositions on student expectations for instructor communication behavior. Communication Education, 50, 314–326.
  8. Frymier, A., & Houser, M. (2000). The teacher-student relationship as an interpersonal relationship. Communication Education, 49, 207–219.
  9. Fusani, D. S. (1994).“Extra-class” communication: Frequency, immediacy, self-disclosure, and satisfaction in student-faculty interaction outside the classroom. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22(3), 232-255.
  10. George, B. (2004). Authentic Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., & W, F. (2005). “Can You See the Real Me?” A self-based model of Authentic leader and follower development, Leadership Quarterly, 16 (3), 343–372.
  11. George, J. (2000). Emotions and leadership: The role of emotional intelligence. Human Relations, 53, 1027–1055.
  12. Gorham, J., & Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationship of teachers’ use of humor in the classroom to immediacy and student learning. Communication Education, 39, 46–62.
  13. Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1995). Hogan personality inventory manual. Second Edition.
  14. Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems. House, R. J. & Baetz, M. L. (1979). Leadership: Some empirical generalizations and n