SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

PERSON-GROUP FIT IN ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE

ÖRGÜTSEL BAĞLAMDA KİŞİ-GRUP UYUMU KURAMSAL PERSPEKTİF

Işık ÇİÇEK
İdil EVCİMEN
İsmail Hakkı BİÇER
Pages
699–730
Publication Date
2018-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Sub-dimensions are explained depending on operational dimensions of fit

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The importance of human that is a component of entellectual capital has increasingly gained importance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Besides, the number of project-based work in organizastions has increased and group-type work has remarkable significance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Sub-dimensions are explained depending on operational dimensions of fit
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Uyum · Grup · Benzerlik

Abstract

The importance of human that is a component of entellectual capital has increasingly gained importance. Therefore, an approach for solving human oriented issues has become to select the employees who congruent with their organizastion, group, job, and supervisor and to retain them. Besides, the number of project-based work in organizastions has increased and group-type work has remarkable significance. This type of organization cause formal structures to increase in number and type execpt for functional sub-units. In this context, the employees’ fit with their group is paid attention by academicians and professionals and fit or misfit with group leads to the individual, group, and organizational level effects. In this study, the dimenisons, antecedents, types, and effects of person-group fit are mentioned. Sub-dimensions are explained depending on operational dimensions of fit

Özet

Günümüzün artan rekabet şartlarında bir entelektüel sermaye bileşeni olan insanın önemi daha da artmış, insan odaklı sorunlara çözüm bulmada getirilecek bir yaklaşım ise kurumu, grubu, işi ve yöneticisi ile uyumlu işgöreni seçmek ve elde tutmak olmuştur. Bunun yanırısa, işletmelerde proje bazlı yürütülen işlerin yaygınlaşması grup çalışmalarını önemli hale getirmiş, proje türü organizasyon yapıları işletmelerde fonksiyonel alt birimlerin dışında formal yapıları sayı ve tür olarak arttırmıştır. Bu bağlamda çalışanların grupları ile uyumu önemli hale gelmekte, kuruma ve yapılan işe uyumun yanısıra grup ile olan uyum/uyumsuzluk bireysel, grup ve işletme düzeyinde olumlu/olumsuz etkileri beraberinde getirmektedir. Bu çalışmada kişi-grup uyumunun boyutları, belirleyicileri, türleri ve etkilerinden söz edilerek uyumun operasyonel tanımına bağlı olarak geliştirilen alt boyutlandırmalar açıklamıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİÇEK, I., EVCİMEN, İ., BİÇER, İ. H. (2018). PERSON-GROUP FIT IN ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 699–730. https://ajindex.com/articles/169720

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adkins, C.L., Russel, C. J. & Werbel, J. D. (1994). Judgements of fit in the selection process: The role of work value congruence. Personnel Psychology, 47, 605-623
  2. Adkins, C. L., Rawlin, E. C., Meglino, B. M. (1996). Value congruence between co-workers and its relationship to work outcomes, Group and Organization Management, 21 (4), 439-460
  3. Ahmad, Kamarul Z. B. (2008). Relationship between leader-subordinate personality congruence and persormance and satisfaction in the U. K., Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 29(5), 396-411
  4. Antonioni, D. & Park, H. (2001). The effects of personality similarity on peer ratings of contextual work behaviors. Personnel Psychology, 54, 331-60
  5. Arıkan, S. (2009). Collective efficacy and organizational effectiveness: Antecedents and consequences (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi.
  6. Ashforth, B.E. (1987). Organizations and the petty tyranny: An exploratory study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, New Orleans, LA. Ashkanasy, N.M., & O’Connor, C. (1994). Value differences as a barrier in leader-member exchange: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Paper presented at the Academy of Management annual meeting, Dallas, TX Atay, O. (2007). İşletmelerde doğal grupların iş tatmini üzerindeki etkileri ve bir uygulama (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). İnönü Üniversitesi.
  7. Autry, C. W. & Daugherty, P. J. (2003). Warehouse operations employees: linking person organization fit, job satisfaction and coping responses. Journal of Business Logistics, 24(1), 171-198
  8. Barsade, SG, Ward, AJ, Turner, JDF, & Sonnenfeld, JA. (2000). To your heart’s content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45 (4), 802-837 Box G,. ve Draper NR. (2007). Response surfaces, mixtures, and ridge analyses. 2nd ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0-470-05357-7
  9. Byrne, D. (1971).
  10. The attraction paradigm. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  11. Cable, D. M. & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person-Organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 67, 294-311
  12. Cable, D. M. ve Judge, T. A. (1997). Interviews perception of person-organization fit and organizational selection decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(4), 546-561.
  13. Carless, S. A. (2005a). Person-job fit versus person-organization fit as predictors of organizational attraction and job acceptance intentions: a longitudinal study, Journal of Occupationa