SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES WITH BEST-WORST METHOD AND TOPSIS

Gökhan AKYÜZ
Ömür TOSUN
Salih AKA
Pages
108–125
Publication Date
2020-03-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The solutions found are consistent with the real life market shares of the insurance companies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Like in any other field, performance of a company in the insurance industry is the key factor of gaining competitive advantage and market share.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, insurance companies are ranked according to their 2016 performance indicators using a two-step hybrid MCDM method including BWM and TOPSIS.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The solutions found are consistent with the real life market shares of the insurance companies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Best-Worst Method · Performance Order · Non-Life Insurance

Özet

Like in any other field, performance of a company in the insurance industry is the key factor of gaining competitive advantage and market share. In this study, insurance companies are ranked according to their 2016 performance indicators using a two-step hybrid MCDM method including BWM and TOPSIS. Only the non-life insurance companies are used in the study. BWM is one of the relatively new MCDM methods, which has an advantage of using less comparison, measuring the consistency between the pair-wise comparisons and giving interval analysis for multi-optimal situations. In the proposed methodology, BWM is used to calculate the criterion weights and TOPSIS to rank the alternatives. The solutions found are consistent with the real life market shares of the insurance companies.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKYÜZ, G., TOSUN, Ö., AKA, S. (2020). PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES WITH BEST-WORST METHOD AND TOPSIS. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 108–125. https://ajindex.com/articles/169688

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ahmad, W. N., Wan, K., Rezaei, J., Sadaghiani, S., & Tavasszy, L. A. (2017). Evaluation of the external forces affecting the sustainability of oil and gas supply chain using best worst method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 153, 242-252.
  2. Akhisar, I., & Tunay, N. (2015). Performance ranking of Turkish life insurance companies using AHP and TOPSIS. Management International Conference. Portoroz, Slovenia. Aktan, H. E., & Tosun, Ö. (2013). An integrated fuzzy AHP–fuzzy TOPSIS approach for AS/RS selection. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 11(2), 228-245.
  3. Altan, M. S. (2010). Türk sigortacılık sektöründe etkinlik: Veri zarflama analizi yöntemi ile bir uygulama. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(1), 185-204.
  4. Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589-609.
  5. Bawa, S. K., & Chattha, S. (2013). Financial performance of life insurers in Indian insurance industry. Pacific Business Review International, 6(5), 44-52.
  6. Chang, S. H., Wu, T. C., Tseng, H. E., Su, Y. J., & Ko, C. C. (2012). Media mix decision support for schools based on analytic network process. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 19(7), 297-304.
  7. Cummins, J. D., Weiss, M. A., Xie, X., & Zi, H. (2010). Economies of scope in financial services: A DEA efficiency analysis of the US insurance industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(7), 1525-1539.
  8. Cummins, J. D., & Weiss, M. A. (2014). Systemic risk and the US insurance sector. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 81(3), 489-528.
  9. Eling, M., & Luhnen, M. (2010). Efficiency in the international insurance industry: A cross-country comparison. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(7), 1497-1509.
  10. Ghaffari, S., Arab, A., Nafari, J., & Mangehti, M. (2017). Investigation and evaluation of key success factors in technological innovation development based on BWM. Decision Science Letters, 6, 295-306.
  11. Gupta, H., & Barua, M. K. (2016). Identifying enablers of technological innovation for Indian MSMEs using best–worst multi criteria decision making method. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 107, 69-79.
  12. Gupta, P., Anand, S., & Gupta, H. (2017). Developing a roadmap to overcome barriers to energy efficiency in buildings using best worst method. Sustainable Cities and Society, 31, 244-259.
  13. Klumpes, P. J. M. (2004). Performance benchmarking in financial services: Evidence from the UK life insurance industry. T