SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4

FACTORS AFFECTING EXTERNAL DEBT IN TRANSITION ECONOMIES: THE CASE OF CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS

Ersin Nail SAĞDIÇ
Fazlı YILDIZ
Pages
891–909
Publication Date
2020-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Panel regression results show that public expenditures and the debt service have positive effect on external debt, while current account of the balance, inflation rate and domestic savings have a negative, and also significant effect on external debt.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study is to examine the key factors affecting external debts for the Central Asia and the Caucasus economies between the years 1995-2017 by using panel data analysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Panel regression results show that public expenditures and the debt service have positive effect on external debt, while current account of the balance, inflation rate and domestic savings have a negative, and also significant effect on external debt.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of this study show that foreign debt is being used as a significant source of financing for public expenditures, foreign debt repayments, and the current account deficit in the countries of Central Asia and the Caucasus.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:External Debt · Panel Data Analysis · Transition Economies

Abstract

This study is to examine the key factors affecting external debts for the Central Asia and the Caucasus economies between the years 1995-2017 by using panel data analysis. Panel regression results show that public expenditures and the debt service have positive effect on external debt, while current account of the balance, inflation rate and domestic savings have a negative, and also significant effect on external debt. The results of this study show that foreign debt is being used as a significant source of financing for public expenditures, foreign debt repayments, and the current account deficit in the countries of Central Asia and the Caucasus.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAĞDIÇ, E. N., YILDIZ, F. (2020). FACTORS AFFECTING EXTERNAL DEBT IN TRANSITION ECONOMIES: THE CASE OF CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4, 891–909. https://ajindex.com/articles/169659

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Açba, S. (2016). Devlet Borçlanması. Ankara:
  2. Adım Yayıncılık. Adıyaman, A.T. (2006). Dış Borçlarımız ve Ekonomik Etkileri. Sayıştay Dergisi, 62, 21-45.
  3. Abdullahi, M. M., Abu Bakar, N.A. & Hassan, S.B. (2015). Determining the macroeconomic factors of external debt accumulation in Nigeria: An ARDL bound test approach. 2nd Global Conference on Business and Social Sciences, September 17-18,
  4. Bali, Indonesia. Al-Fawwaz, T.M. (2016). Determinants of external debt in Jordan: An empirical study (1990-2014). International Business Research, 9(7), ss 116-123.
  5. Arslan, E. & Athwari, B. (2019). The factors affecting the external debt: Case of Turkey. International Social Sciences Studies Journal, 5(31), ss. 1295-1301.
  6. Akduğan, U. (2017). Türkiye’de dış borç stokunun belirleyicileri. Business and Economics Research Journal, 8(2), ss. 183-202.
  7. Awan, A., Asghar, N. & Ur Rehman, H. (2011). The impact of exchange rate, fiscal deficit and terms of trade on external debt of Pakistan. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 1(3), ss. 10–24.
  8. Awan, R.U., Anjum, A. & Rahim, S. (2015). An econometric analysis of determinants of external debt in Pakistan. British Journal of Economics, Management & Trade, 5(4), ss. 382-391.
  9. Bai, J. & Ng, S. (2004). A panic attack on unit roots and cointegration. Econometrica, 72(4), ss. 1127- 1177. Bilginoğlu, M. A. & Aysu, A. (2008). Dış borçların ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisi: Türkiye örneği. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 31, ss. 1-23.
  10. Bittencourt, M. (2018). Young democracies and government debt: Evidence from South America. Journal of Economic Policy Reform,22(4), ss. 351-368.
  11. Breitung, J. (2000). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration and Dynamic Panels, (Ed. B.H. Baltagi- T.B. FOMBY- R.C. Hill), Amsterdam: Elsevier, ss. 161-177.
  12. Breusch, T. S. & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), ss. 239-253.
  13. Bulut, C. & Süleymanov, E. (2013). Dövlet Maliyyesi. Bakü: Qafqaz Universiteti Nəşri. Chang, Y. (2002). Nonlinear IV unit root tests in panels with cross-sectional dependency. Journal of Econometrics, 110(2), ss. 261-292.
  14. Chenery, S. & Strout, A.M. (1966). Foreign assistance and economic development. The American Economic Review, 56(4), ss. 679-733.
  15. Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money a