SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4

TECHNOLOGY READINESS AND TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE OF ACADEMIC STAFFS

Hülya BAKIRTAŞ
Cemil AKKAŞ
Pages
1043–1058
Publication Date
2020-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that of optimism dimension of TRI has a positive effect on both consumers perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use while innovativeness dimension has a positive effect on perceived ease of use.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Technology Reading Index (TRI) has used to determine individuals’ willingness to use of technology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study focuses on differences among belief and use new technology of academic staffs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that of optimism dimension of TRI has a positive effect on both consumers perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use while innovativeness dimension has a positive effect on perceived ease of use.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Technology Reading Index · Technology Acceptance Model · New Technology Belief

Abstract

Technology Reading Index (TRI) has used to determine individuals’ willingness to use of technology. This study focuses on differences among belief and use new technology of academic staffs. The article examines how each dimension (optimism, innovativeness, discomfort, insecurity) of Technology Reading Index (TRI) influences Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) which have consumer perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use dimensions. The results show that of optimism dimension of TRI has a positive effect on both consumers perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use while innovativeness dimension has a positive effect on perceived ease of use. Researches on TRI and TAM have overlooked the potential role of technology readiness and acceptance in the development of academic staff. This study tests belief and use new technology of academic staffs.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAKIRTAŞ, H., AKKAŞ, C. (2020). TECHNOLOGY READINESS AND TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE OF ACADEMIC STAFFS. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4, 1043–1058. https://ajindex.com/articles/169655

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Acar, Z., & Gürol, P. (2018). Çalışanların teknoloji kullanım adaptasyonunun firmaların lojistik servis performansına etkisi. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 19(1), 59-68.
  2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.
  3. Borrero, J. D., Yousafzai, S. Y., Javed, U., & Page, K. L. (2014). Expressive participation in internet social movements: Testing the moderating effect of technology readiness and sex on student sns use. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 39-49.
  4. Brahima, S. (2017). The world in 2017: ICT facts and figures, https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/ Pages/facts/default.aspx. Cibaroğlu, M. O., & Turan, A. H. (2018). Elektronik belge yönetim sistemlerinin genişletilmiş teknoloji kabul modeli temelinde kullanımı: Ampirik bir değerlendirme. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(2), 204-217.
  5. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
  6. Demirci, A.E., & Ersoy, N. F. (2008). Technology readiness for innovative high-tech products: How consumers perceive and adopt new technologies. Business Review, 10(2). Elliott, K. M., Hall, M. C. & Meng, J. G. (2008). Student technology readiness and its impact on cultural competency. College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal (CTMS), 4(6), 11-22.
  7. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Godoe, P., & Johansen, T. S. (2012). Understanding adoption of new technologies: Technology readiness and technology acceptance as an integrated concept. Journal of European Psychology Students, 3, 38-53.
  8. Hagspiel, V., Huisman, K. J., & Nunes, C. (2015). Optimal technology adoption when the arrival rate of new technologies changes. European Journal of Operational Research, 243, 897-911.
  9. Haidari, S. M., Yelken, T. Y., & Akay, C. (2019). Technology-enhanced self-directed language learning behaviors of efl student teachers. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(3), 229-245.
  10. Hair, J. E., Anderson, R. E., Tatman, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. 5th Edition, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Lam, S. Y., Chiang J., & Parasuraman, A. (2008). The effects of the dimensions of technology readine