SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 629

The Relationship Among Price Perception, Gender, and Shopping Frequency in Y Generation

Cinsiyet ve Alışveriş Davranışının Fiyat Algılamaları ile İlişkisinin Saptanması: Y Kuşağı Üzerine Bir Araştırma

ZEHRA BOZBAY
ULUN AKTURAN
Pages
87–102
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition to that, consumers who shop more frequently do differ from consumers who shop occasionally and less frequently, with respect to price consciousness and prestige sensitivity

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Y generation is argued to be between 31-70 million all over the World.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the research, 226 valid questionnaires were obtained via face-to-face survey method, The hypothesis were analyzed by t-test and ANOVA.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition to that, consumers who shop more frequently do differ from consumers who shop occasionally and less frequently, with respect to price consciousness and prestige sensitivity
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Y generation is argued to be between 31-70 million all over the World. As such, Y generation is an important and potential market for firms. The aim of this reseach is to determine the price perception of Y generation and to detect whether there are differences between male and female consumers, and consumers who shop frequently and less frequently. In the research, 226 valid questionnaires were obtained via face-to-face survey method, The hypothesis were analyzed by t-test and ANOVA. As a result, we have found that women have more positive perceptions than men in relation with the price consciousness, coupon pronneness, and sale pronneness. In addition to that, consumers who shop more frequently do differ from consumers who shop occasionally and less frequently, with respect to price consciousness and prestige sensitivity

Özet

Dünya genelinde Y kuşağı popülasyonun 31-70 milyon kişi aralığında olduğu tartışılmaktadır. Bu bağlamda Y kuşağı işletmeler için önemli ve potansiyel bir pazarı oluşturmaktadır. Bu araştırmanın amacı Y kuşağı tüketicilerinin fiyata yönelik algılarını saptamak ve bu algıların cinsiyete ve alışveriş sıklığına göre değişkenlik gösterip göstermediğini belirlemektir. Araştırma kapsamında 226 kişi ile yüz yüze anket tekniği kullanılarak data toplanmış ve hipotezler t-testi ve ANOVA kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucuna göre Y kuşağı kadın tüketiciler erkek tüketicilere nazaran fiyat bilinci, kupon duyarlılığı ve indirim duyarlılığı açılarından farklılık göstermektedir. Kadınlar fiyat uzmanlığı, kupon ve indirime duyarlılığına ilişkin erkeklere nazaran daha olumlu algılara sahiptir. Bunlara ek olarak Y kuşağında sık giyim alışverişi yapan tüketicilerin fiyat uzmanlığı ve prestij duyarlılıkları ara sıra ve seyrek alışveriş yapan tüketicilere oranla daha yüksek olarak bulunmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZBAY, Z., AKTURAN, U. (2017). The Relationship Among Price Perception, Gender, and Shopping Frequency in Y Generation. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 629, 87–102. https://ajindex.com/articles/167485

References (13)

  1. ALTUNTUĞ, Nevriye; (2012), Kuşaktan kuşağa tüketim olgusu ve geleceğin tüketici profili. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(1), ss.203-212.
  2. ALWIN, Duane F. ve Ryan J. MCCAMMON; (2007), Rethinking generations. Research in Human Development, 4(3-4), pp. 219-237.
  3. BABIN, Barry J.; William R. DARDEN ve Mitch GRIFFIN; (1994), Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), pp 644-656.
  4. BATRA, Rajeev ve Olli T. AHTOLA; (1991), Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Marketing Letters, 2(2), pp. 159-170.
  5. BELK, Russell W.; (1985), Materialism: Trait aspects of living in the material world. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), pp. 265-280.
  6. CENNAMO, Lucy ve Dianne GARDNER; (2008), Generational differences in work values, outcomes and person-organisation values fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), pp. 891- 906. Deloitte Millenial Survey, 2014
  7. DICKSON, Peter R. ve Alan G. SAWYER; (1990), The price knowledge and search of supermarket shoppers. The Journal of Marketing, 54(3), pp. 42-53.
  8. FEICK, Lawrence F. ve Linda L. PRICE; (1987), The market maven: A diffuser of marketplace information. The Journal of Marketing, 51(1), pp. 83-97.
  9. HAIR, J. F., R.E. ANDERSON, B.J., BABIN ve W.C. BLACK; (2010), Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (Vol. 7). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. HELGESON, James G. ve Sharon E. BEATTY; (1985), An information processing perspective on the internalization of price stimuli. NA-Advances in Consumer Research, 12(1), pp.91-96.
  10. KASTANAKIS, Minas N. ve George BALABANIS; (2012), Between the mass and the class: Antecedents of the “bandwagon” luxury consumption behavior. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), pp. 1399-1407.
  11. KJELDGAARD, Dannie ve, Søren ASKEGAARD; (2006) The glocalization of youth culture: The global youth segment as structures of common difference. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(2), pp. 231-247.
  12. KUPPERSCHMIDT, Betty R.; (2000), Multigeneration employees: strategies for effective management. The health care manager, 19(1), pp. 65- 76 LANCASTER, Lynne C. ve David STILLMAN; (2002), When generations collide: how to solve the generational puzzle at work. LAZAREVIC, Violet; (2012), Encouraging brand loyalty in fickle generation Y consumers. Young Consumers, 13(1), pp. 45-61.
  13. LEVY, Michael ve Barton A. WEITZ; (2001) Retailing Management. 7th. New York McGraw. LICHTENSTEIN, Donald R.; Nancy M. RIDGWAY ve Richard G. NETEMEYER; (1993)