Journals / Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care / 2026 / Volume: 7 Issue: 5

Clinical and laboratory factors associated with placental abruption: a retrospective case-control study

Rıfat Taner Aksoy(Ankara Bilkent Şehir Hastanesi)0000-0003-3931-4835
Aytekin Tokmak(KIRIKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5739-5689
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In conclusion, maternal age, gestational age, MAP, antepartum bleeding, and preoperative NLR are independently associated with PA.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: Placental abruption (PA) is a major obstetric emergency associated with substantial maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This retrospective case control study included 308 singleton pregnancies, comprising 59 women with PA and 249 controls.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In conclusion, maternal age, gestational age, MAP, antepartum bleeding, and preoperative NLR are independently associated with PA.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Placental abruption · fetal death · pregnancy complications

Abstract

Aims: Placental abruption (PA) is a major obstetric emergency associated with substantial maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Although systemic inflammation and vascular dysfunction have been implicated in its pathophysiology, the clinical and laboratory factors associated with PA remain incompletely characterized. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between PA and first-trimester and preoperative laboratory parameters, along with selected clinical features. Methods: This retrospective case control study included 308 singleton pregnancies, comprising 59 women with PA and 249 controls. Maternal demographic characteristics, obstetric variables, laboratory parameters, hemodynamic measurements, and maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared between groups. Factors independently associated with PA were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: Compared with controls, females with PA had lower gestational age at delivery and neonatal birth weight (both p<0.001). Preoperative inflammatory markers, including leukocyte count, neutrophil count, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), were significantly higher in the PA group (all p<0.05). Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures (MAP) were also higher in females with PA. Neonatal intensive care unit admission, perinatal mortality, and maternal transfusion rates were also significantly increased (all p<0.001). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that maternal age (odds ratio [OR]=0.866, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.789–0.951; p=0.003), gestational age (OR=0.648, 95% CI: 0.478–0.880; p=0.005), MAP (OR=1.096, 95% CI: 1.030–1.166; p=0.004), antepartum bleeding (OR=46.285, 95% CI: 16.132–132.802; p<0.001), and preoperative NLR (OR=1.329, 95% CI: 1.057–1.670; p=0.015) were independently associated with PA, whereas preoperative alanine aminotransferase was not significantly associated with PA (p=0.748). Conclusion: In conclusion, maternal age, gestational age, MAP, antepartum bleeding, and preoperative NLR are independently associated with PA. Owing to its low cost and widespread accessibility, NLR offers a practical supplementary marker when clinical suspicion of PA arises. Nevertheless, because post-presentation values may merely capture the acute inflammatory cascade triggered by the event itself, clinicians should exercise caution and avoid overinterpreting NLR as a predictive indicator pending well-designed prospective studies.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aksoy, R. T., Tokmak, A. (2026). Clinical and laboratory factors associated with placental abruption: a retrospective case-control study. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care, Volume: 7 Issue: 5. https://ajindex.com/articles/1668088

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 183: postpartum hemorrhage. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(4):e168-e186. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002351
  2. Ozkan S, Firatligil FB, Sucu S, et al. Can inflammatory biomarkers based on first trimester complete blood count parameters predict placental abruption? A case-control study. J Reprod Immunol. 2024;164:104279. doi:10.1016/j.jri.2024.104279
  3. Hai L, Hu ZD. The clinical utility of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in pregnancy related complications: a mini-review. J Lab Precis Med. 2020; 5:1. doi:10.21037/jlpm.2019.10.03
  4. Sener S, Uysal G, Adiguzel C, Okcu NT. Analysis of maternal fetal outcomes and complete blood count parameters according to the stages of placental abruption: a retrospective study. Eur J Med Res. 2025;30(1): 489. doi:10.1186/s40001-025-02778-y
  5. Steinborn A, Seidl C, Sayehli C, et al. Anti-fetal immune response mechanisms may be involved in the pathogenesis of placental abruption. Clin Immunol. 2004;110(1):45-54. doi:10.1016/j.clim.2003.09.004
  6. Guleroglu FY, Ekmez M, Atas BS, Cetin A. Value of hematological indices NLR, PLR, and MPV to determine the clinical outcome of placental abruption in women regarding stillbirth. North Clin Istanb. 2023;10(1):40-47. doi:10.14744/nci.2022.94752
  7. Tugrul Ersak D, Kara Ö, Yakut K, et al. The association between placental abruption and platelet indices. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2023;42(3):367-375. doi:10.1080/15513815.2023.2166798
  8. Ananth CV, Lavery JA, Vintzileos AM, et al. Severe placental abruption: clinical definition and associations with maternal complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(2):272.e1-272.e9. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.09.069
  9. Tadese M, Getachew G, Kebede TN, et al. Perinatal outcomes and predictors of placental abruption: a retrospective study in an Ethiopian tertiary care center. Front Public Health. 2025;12:1453117. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1453117
  10. Ananth CV, Keyes KM, Hamilton A, et al. An international contrast of rates of placental abruption: an age-period-cohort analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0125246. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0125246
  11. Kececioglu M, Koseoglu SB, Tokmak A, et al. Prediction of placenta abruption without risk factors. Med Science. 2016;5(2):411-419. doi:10.5455/medscience.2015.04.8376
  12. Ananth CV, Oyelese Y, Prasad V, Getahun D, Smulian JC. Evidence of placental abruption as a chronic process: associations with vaginal bleeding early in pregnancy and placental lesions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;128(1-2):15-21. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.01.016
  13. Burton GJ, Jauniaux E. Oxidative stress. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;25(3):287-299. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.10.016
  14. Chen D, Gao X, Yang T, et al. Independent risk factors for placental abruption: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025;25(1):351. doi:10.1186/s12884-025-07482-7
  15. Opichka MA, Rappelt MW, Gutterman DD, Grobe JL, McIntosh JJ. Vascular dysfunction in preeclampsia. Cells. 2021;10(11):3055. doi:10.3390/cells10113055
  16. Bağlar İ, Dizdaroğulları GE, Ertekin LT, et al. Adverse perinatal outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a retrospective analysis of the associations between phenotype, body-mass index, and mode of delivery. Samsun Med J. 2025;3(3):96-103.
  17. Bağlar İ, Şanlıkan F, Keles E, Öztürk UK, Mat E, Özkul A. Hypertensive Disorders and perinatal outcomes according to age groups at advanced maternal age. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniv Tıp Derg. 2026;13(1):38-43. doi:10.47572/muskutd.1774358
  18. Rom E, Massalha M, Erez O, Salim R. The association between maternal ABO blood group and the occurrence of spontaneous preterm birth: a retrospective population-based cohort study. Reprod Sci. 2024;31(12): 3697-3704. doi:10.1007/s43032-024-01705-6
  19. Jin Y, Dong M, Yang SW, et al. Evaluation of maternal rhesus blood type as a risk factor in adverse pregnancy outcomes in Korea: a nationwide health insurance database study. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020;63(4):448-454. doi:10.5468/ogs.20004