Journals / Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care / 2026 / Volume: 7 Issue: 5

In vitro antileishmanial activity and selectivity profile of quinazolinone derivatives against Leishmania major

Baycan Mor(Kafkas University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences)0000-0001-9480-3143
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further evaluation in intracellular amastigote models is required to determine whether the observed antileishmanial activity is maintained in a host-cell-associated system.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro antileishmanial activity of five quinazolinone derivatives against Leishmania major (L. major) promastigotes and to determine their cytotoxicity toward human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and corresponding selectivity indices (SI).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The quinazolinone derivatives (K1–K5) were tested against logarithmic-phase L. major promastigotes over a concentration range of 3.125–200 µM, with miltefosine used as the reference drug.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further evaluation in intracellular amastigote models is required to determine whether the observed antileishmanial activity is maintained in a host-cell-associated system.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Leishmania major · quinazolinone · antiprotozoal agents

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro antileishmanial activity of five quinazolinone derivatives against Leishmania major (L. major) promastigotes and to determine their cytotoxicity toward human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and corresponding selectivity indices (SI). Methods: The quinazolinone derivatives (K1–K5) were tested against logarithmic-phase L. major promastigotes over a concentration range of 3.125–200 µM, with miltefosine used as the reference drug. Antileishmanial activity was assessed after 24 h using the cell viability detection kit-8 (CVDK-8). Cytotoxicity was evaluated in HUVECs, and half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were determined by nonlinear regression. SI was calculated as the ratio of the HUVEC IC50 to the L. major IC50. Results: All five quinazolinone derivatives exhibited concentration-dependent antileishmanial activity against L. major, with IC50 values ranging from 29.66 to 41.11 µM. Their HUVEC IC50 values ranged from 69.73 to 91.53 µM. Miltefosine showed greater antileishmanial activity (IC50=21.54 µM) but higher cytotoxicity toward HUVECs (IC50=9.93 µM). Accordingly, K1–K5 showed SI values ranging from 2.15 to 2.38, whereas the SI of miltefosine was 0.46. Conclusion: The five quinazolinone derivatives exhibited in vitro antileishmanial activity against L. major promastigotes and higher SI values than miltefosine under the present experimental conditions. However, the SI values of 2.15–2.38 indicate modest selectivity and should be interpreted cautiously. Further evaluation in intracellular amastigote models is required to determine whether the observed antileishmanial activity is maintained in a host-cell-associated system.

🔖

Cite This Article

Mor, B. (2026). In vitro antileishmanial activity and selectivity profile of quinazolinone derivatives against Leishmania major. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care, Volume: 7 Issue: 5. https://ajindex.com/articles/1668112

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (31)

  1. Cecílio P, Cordeiro-da-Silva A, Oliveira F. Sand flies: basic information on the vectors of leishmaniasis and their interactions with Leishmania parasites. Commun Biol. 2022;5(1):305. doi:10.1038/s42003-022-03240-z
  2. Mohammed MW, Aboagye Y, Anyanful A, Kyei S, Asare KK. Evidence gaps and global patterns in leishmaniasis control: a scoping review of clinical, diagnostic, and treatment strategies. J Parasitol Res. 2026; 2026(1):8882865. doi:10.1155/japr/8882865
  3. Fotakis EA, Papamichail D, Boutsini S, Patsoula E, Panagiotopoulos T. Leishmaniasis in Greece: prospects of transitioning to a One Health surveillance system. One Health. 2024;19:100896. doi:10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100896
  4. Kim J, Zieneldien T, Ma S, Cohen BA. Structural drivers of cutaneous leishmaniasis: examining how the converging effects of displacement, environmental disruption, and political instability reshape epidemiology beyond endemic regions. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2025;10(9): 245. doi:10.3390/tropicalmed10090245
  5. Spotin A, Rouhani S, Parvizi P. The associations of Leishmania major and Leishmania tropica aspects by focusing their morphological and molecular features on clinical appearances in Khuzestan Province, Iran. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:913510. doi:10.1155/2014/913510
  6. Özbel Y, Töz S, Muñoz C, et al. The current epidemiology of leishmaniasis in Turkey, Azerbaijan and Georgia and implications for disease emergence in European countries. Zoonoses Public Health. 2022;69(5):395-407. doi:10.1111/zph.12977
  7. Altamura F, Rajesh R, Catta-Preta CMC, Moretti NS, Cestari I. The current drug discovery landscape for trypanosomiasis and leishmaniasis: challenges and strategies to identify drug targets. Drug Dev Res. 2022;83(2):225-252. doi:10.1002/ddr.21664
  8. Sharifi N, Alitaneh Z, Asadi S, et al. Developing nanosize carrier systems for amphotericin-B: a review on the biomedical application of nanoparticles for the treatment of leishmaniasis and fungal infections. Biotechnol J. 2024;19(1):e2300462. doi:10.1002/biot.202300462
  9. Horácio ECA, Hickson J, Murta SMF, Ruiz JC, Nahum LA. Perspectives from systems biology to improve knowledge of Leishmania drug resistance. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:653670. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2021.653670
  10. Souza RM, Tuon FF, Lindoso JÂL, et al. Cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis: perspectives on immunity, virulence, and treatment. Biomedicines. 2025;13(12):3008. doi:10.3390/biomedicines13123008
  11. Pinheiro AC, Souza MVN. Current leishmaniasis drug discovery. RSC Med Chem. 2022;13(9):1029-1043. doi:10.1039/D1MD00362C
  12. Hassan RM, Yehia H, El-Behairy MF, El-Azzouny AAS, Aboul-Enein MN. Design and synthesis of new quinazolinone derivatives: investigation of antimicrobial and biofilm inhibition effects. Mol Divers. 2025;29:21-42. doi:10.1007/s11030-024-10830-y
  13. Du C, Yang X, Long Y, et al. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel spiro-quinazolinone derivatives as chitin synthase inhibitors and antifungal agents. Eur J Med Chem. 2023;255:115388. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2023.115388
  14. Shourkaei FA, Ranjbar PR, Foroumadi A, Shams F. Design and synthesis of BMH-21-like quinazolinone derivatives as potential anti-cancer agents. J Mol Struct. 2024;1308:138083. doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.138083
  15. Şenol H, Çakır F, Ateşoğlu Ş, et al. 2-Propyl-3-aminoquinazoline-4(3H)-one derivatives as potential androgen receptor inhibitors: synthesis and cytotoxicity against PC3 cell line via in vitro and in silico studies. Arch Pharm. 2025;358(7):e70048. doi:10.1002/ardp.70048
  16. Şenol H, Çağman Z, Çakır F, Tokalı FS. Synthesis, characterization, and in vitro and in silico biological evaluation of novel polyphenols bearing a quinazolin-4(3H)-one ring as promising anti-prostate-cancer agents. Synlett. 2025;36(16):2623-2630. doi:10.1055/a-2500-7537
  17. Tokalı P, Şenol AM, Ateşoğlu Ş, et al. New quinazolinone-thiazolidinedione hybrids as selective anti-lung cancer agents and promising EGFR inhibitors. Future Med Chem. 2026;18(4):415-428. doi:10.1080/17568919.2026.2620368
  18. Ghoneim MM, Abdelgawad MA, Elkanzi NAA, et al. A literature review on pharmacological aspects, docking studies, and synthetic approaches of quinazoline and quinazolinone derivatives. Arch Pharm (Weinheim). 2024;357:e2400057. doi:10.1002/ardp.202400057
  19. Tokalı FS. Recent advances in quinazolinone derivatives: structure, design and therapeutic potential. Future Med Chem. 2025;17:1071-1091. doi:10.1080/17568919.2025.2504327
  20. Prinsloo IF, Zuma NH, Aucamp J, N'Da DD. Synthesis and in vitro antileishmanial efficacy of novel quinazolinone derivatives. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2021;97:383-398. doi:10.1111/cbdd.13790
  21. Seifu GW, Birhan YS, Beshay BY, Hymete A, Bekhit AA. Synthesis, antimalarial, antileishmanial evaluation, and molecular docking study of some 3-aryl-2-styryl substituted-4(3H)-quinazolinone derivatives. BMC Chem. 2022;16:107. doi:10.1186/s13065-022-00903-0
  22. Mor B, Tokalı FS, Yıldız B, Şenol H, Aksu Ş, Mor N. Design, synthesis, and evaluation of novel quinazolin-4(3H)-one derivatives: anti-leishmanial activity, selectivity, and molecular docking insights. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2025;39:e70309. doi:10.1002/jbt.70309
  23. Tokalı FS, Şenol H, Ateşoğlu Ş, Akbaş F. A series of quinazolin-4(3H)-one-morpholine hybrids as anti-lung-cancer agents: synthesis, molecular docking, molecular dynamics, ADME prediction and biological activity studies. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2024;104(1):e14599. doi:10.1111/cbdd.14599
  24. Mor N, Yıldız B, Mor B, Tokalı FS. New thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidin-4(3H)-one Schiff bases as selective antileishmanial agents. Life. 2026;16(6):979. doi:10.3390/life16060979
  25. Ramu D, Garg S, Ayana R, et al. Novel β-carboline-quinazolinone hybrids disrupt Leishmania donovani redox homeostasis and show promising antileishmanial activity. Biochem Pharmacol. 2017;129:26-42. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2016.12.012
  26. Ansari A, Seth A, Dutta M, et al. Discovery, SAR and mechanistic studies of quinazolinone-based acetamide derivatives in experimental visceral leishmaniasis. Eur J Med Chem. 2023;257:115524. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2023.115524
  27. Coşkun Demirkalp AN. Use and comparison of MTT, XTT and iCELLigence methods in the evaluation of drug toxicity. J Med Palliat Care. 2025;6(1):66-71. doi:10.47582/jompac.1605042
  28. Öztürk Civelek D, Çelik NC, Çavuş M, Zengin Kurt B. Anticancer effects of ruthenium-sorafenib complexes in prostate cancer cell lines. J Med Palliat Care. 2026;7(2):261-268. doi:10.47582/jompac.1869349
  29. Setshedi KJ, Beteck RM, Jesumoroti OJ, et al. 2-Aroyl quinazolinone: synthesis and in vitro anti-parasitic activity. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2023; 102:763-772. doi:10.1111/cbdd.14284
  30. Romero AH, Aguilera E, Gotopo L, Cabrera G, Dávila B, Cerecetto H. Optimization of the 2-arylquinazoline-4(3H)one scaffold for a selective and potent antitrypanosomal agent: modulation of the mechanism of action through chemical functionalization. RSC Med Chem. 2023;14(10): 1992-2006. doi:10.1039/D3MD00243H
  31. Kaur S, Kumar K, Thakur S, et al. Pyrazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline-based heterocycles exhibit potent antileishmanial activity: Mechanistic insights and toxicity profile. Bioorg Chem. 2026;177:109916. doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2026.109916