Journals / Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care / 2026 / Volume: 7 Issue: 5

Clustering of OECD countries by chronic disease burden: identifying associated health system and socioeconomic factors via machine learning

Seda Sönmez(KIRIKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ SAĞLIK YÖNETİMİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-8773-6007
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The profiles of the burden of chronic diseases in OECD countries are associated with their socioeconomic and health system characteristics, particularly income inequality.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: The aim of this study is to cluster OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries based on their chronic disease burden and to rank the health system and socioeconomic variables that discriminate these clusters using machine learning.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Secondary data obtained from international databases were analyzed in two stages for 14 variables across 38 OECD countries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The profiles of the burden of chronic diseases in OECD countries are associated with their socioeconomic and health system characteristics, particularly income inequality.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Chronic disease · cluster analysis · machine learning

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study is to cluster OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries based on their chronic disease burden and to rank the health system and socioeconomic variables that discriminate these clusters using machine learning. Methods: Secondary data obtained from international databases were analyzed in two stages for 14 variables across 38 OECD countries. First, a K-means clustering analysis was conducted based on age-standardized DALY (disability adjusted life years) rates for five major chronic disease groups and two associated risk factors. The statistical significance of cluster differences was tested using the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Bonferroni-corrected Dunn test. Second, health system and socioeconomic variables discriminating between clusters were ranked using the standard and balanced Random Forest models. Results: OECD countries were grouped into three clusters: cluster 1 (n=4; Turkiye, United States, Mexico, Costa Rica), which exhibits a high burden of diabetes and kidney diseases and chronic respiratory diseases along with significant income inequality; cluster 2 (n=8; Central and Eastern Europe, Greece), which has the highest out-of-pocket payment rates along with a high burden of cardiovascular disease and tobacco-related risks; and cluster 3 (n=26; including Western European countries, Japan, Korea), which combines a relatively low burden of chronic diseases with high levels of health expenditure. Six out of seven health system and socioeconomic variables showed significant differences across the clusters. The standard Random Forest model identified current health expenditure and per capita income as the most discriminating variables, whereas in the balanced model, which accounted for class imbalance, income inequality ranked first. Conclusion: The profiles of the burden of chronic diseases in OECD countries are associated with their socioeconomic and health system characteristics, particularly income inequality.

🔖

Cite This Article

Sönmez, S. (2026). Clustering of OECD countries by chronic disease burden: identifying associated health system and socioeconomic factors via machine learning. Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care, Volume: 7 Issue: 5. https://ajindex.com/articles/1668110

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. Vandenberghe D, Albrecht J. The financial burden of non-communicable diseases in the European Union: a systematic review. Eur J Public Health. 2020;30(4):833-839. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckz073
  2. Gmeinder M, Morgan D, Mueller M. How Much Do OECD Countries Spend on Prevention? OECD Health Working Papers No 101. OECD Publishing; 2017. doi:10.1787/f19e803c-en
  3. Melaku YA, Renzaho A, Gill TK, et al. Burden and trend of diet-related non-communicable diseases in Australia and comparison with 34 OECD countries, 1990–2015: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Eur J Nutr. 2019;58(3):1299-1313. doi:10.1007/s00394-018-1656-7
  4. Andrade CAS, Mahrouseh N, Gabrani J, et al. Inequalities in the burden of non-communicable diseases across European countries: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease 2019 study. Int J Equity Health. 2023;22(1):140. doi:10.1186/s12939-023-01958-8
  5. Pomerleau J, Knai C, Nolte E. The burden of chronic disease in Europe. In: Nolte E, McKee M, eds. Caring for People with Chronic Conditions: A Health System Perspective. Open University Press; 2008:15-42.
  6. Kočiš Krůtilová V, Bahnsen L, De Graeve D. The out-of-pocket burden of chronic diseases: the cases of Belgian, Czech and German older adults. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):239. doi:10.1186/s12913-021-06259-w
  7. Kim H, Kim EJ. Effects of senility on disease burden: panel analysis using 2010 to 2019 OECD health data. Health Serv Insights. 2023;16: 11786329231188286. doi:10.1177/11786329231188286
  8. Howard SW, BeLue R, van de Klundert J. Editorial: the role of healthcare delivery, payment and policy innovations in decreasing the global burden of chronic disease. Front Public Health. 2022; 10:972064. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972064.
  9. Dragos SL, Mare C, Dragos CM, Muresan GM, Purcel AA. Does voluntary health insurance improve health and longevity? Evidence from European OECD countries. Eur J Health Econ. 2022;23(8):1397-1411. doi:10.1007/s10198-022-01439-9
  10. Cecchini M, Vuik S, Everard C. Cluster Analysis of Non-communicable Disease Burden, Prevention and Management Across EU27+2 Countries. OECD Health Working Papers No. 195. OECD Publishing; 2026. doi:10.1787/eba334a3-en
  11. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Results Tool. IHME. 2025. Accessed October 7, 2026. https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results/
  12. OECD. OECD Health Statistics. OECD Data Explorer. 2025. Accessed October 7, 2026. https://data-explorer.oecd.org/?fs[0]=Topic%2C0% 7CHealth%23HEA%23&pg=0&fc=Topic&bp=true&snb=85
  13. World Bank. World Development Indicators. World Bank Open Data. 2026. Accessed October 7, 2026. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
  14. Hennig C. Cluster-wise assessment of cluster stability. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2007;52(1):258-271. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2006.11.025
  15. Stuckler D. Population causes and consequences of leading chronic diseases: a comparative analysis of prevailing explanations. Milbank Q. 2008;86(2):273-326. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2008.00522.x
  16. López-Casasnovas G, Soley-Bori M. The socioeconomic determinants of health: economic growth and health in the OECD countries during the last three decades. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(1):815-829. doi:10.3390/ijerph110100815
  17. Alkaya A, Alkaş C. OECD ülkelerinin sağlık göstergelerine göre kümeleme analizi sınıflaması. Sosyal Güvence. 2021;19:427-474. doi:10.21441/sosyalguvence.1050881
  18. Ekinci R. Kronik hastalıkların sosyoekonomik belirleyicileri üzerine bir makine öğrenmesi analizi. İzmir İktisat Dergisi. 2025;40(4):942-967. doi:10.24988/ije.1491030
  19. WHO Regional Office for Europe. WHO European Regional Obesity Report 2022. WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2022. Accessed May 2, 2026. https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/9789289057738.
  20. Yiğit P, Yılmaz E, Gedikli E, Hayran OE. The relationship between noncommunicable diseases risk factors, GINI coefficient and health status in organization of economic development and cooperation countries. Turkiye Klinikleri J Health Sci. 2021;6(3):598-608. doi:10.5336/healthsci.2020-77423
  21. Koene RJ, Prizment AE, Blaes A, Konety SH. Shared risk factors in cardiovascular disease and cancer. Circulation. 2016;133(11):1104-1114. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020406
  22. Peasey A, Bobak M, Kubinova R, et al. Determinants of cardiovascular disease and other non-communicable diseases in Central and Eastern Europe: rationale and design of the HAPIEE study. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:255. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-6-255
  23. Movsisyan NK, Vinciguerra M, Medina-Inojosa JR, Lopez-Jimenez F. Cardiovascular diseases in central and Eastern Europe: a call for more surveillance and evidence-based health promotion. Ann Glob Health. 2020;86(1):21. doi:10.5334/aogh.2713
  24. Cenko E, Manfrini O, Fabin N, et al. Clinical determinants of ischemic heart disease in Eastern Europe. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023;33:100698. doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100698
  25. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Health and Care Workforce in Europe: Time to Act. WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2022. Accessed May 5, 2026. https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/9789289058339
  26. Adolph TE, Tilg H. Western diets and chronic diseases. Nat Med. 2024; 30(8):2133-2147. doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03165-6
  27. Anwar A, Hyder S, Mohamed Nor N, Younis M. Government health expenditures and health outcome nexus: a study on OECD countries. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1123759. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1123759
  28. Aytemiz L, Sart G, Bayar Y, Danilina M, Sezgin FH. The long-term effect of social, educational, and health expenditures on indicators of life expectancy: an empirical analysis for the OECD countries. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1497794. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1497794
  29. Masseria C, Mossialos E, Allin S. Measurement of Socioeconomic Inequality of Health in 10 European Countries: An Exploratory Analysis of SHARE Using Three Approaches. European Commission Research Note; 2006.
  30. Wang F, Wang JD. Investing preventive care and economic development in ageing societies: empirical evidences from OECD countries. Health Econ Rev. 2021;11(1):18. doi:10.1186/s13561-021-00321-3