Journals / Anatolian Current Medical Journal / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 6

Clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes, and factors associated with postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia in patients with hydatidiform mole: a single-center retrospective cohort study

Ayşe Hazırbulan(SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL KANUNİ SULTAN SÜLEYMAN SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ)0000-0002-0206-1697
Rukiye Akman(SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL KANUNİ SULTAN SÜLEYMAN SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ)0009-0001-9662-1252
Taşkın Erkinüresin(SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL KANUNİ SULTAN SÜLEYMAN SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ)0000-0003-1725-6590
Tolga Çiftpınar(SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL KANUNİ SULTAN SÜLEYMAN SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ)0000-0001-7406-0629
Ozgur Akbayir(SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL KANUNİ SULTAN SÜLEYMAN SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ)0000-0002-2699-4969
Merve Aldıkaçtıoğlu Talmaç(SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL KANUNİ SULTAN SÜLEYMAN SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ)0000-0001-7219-1772
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, normalization of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) was achieved in 247 patients (95.4%).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: This study evaluated the clinical, laboratory, ultrasonographic, histopathological, treatment, and follow-up characteristics of patients with molar pregnancy and assessed the clinical relevance of baseline factors associated with the development of postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) in a contemporary single-center cohort.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This retrospective cohort included 259 patients with hydatidiform mole.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, normalization of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) was achieved in 247 patients (95.4%).
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hydatidiform mole · gestational trophoblastic disease · chorionic gonadotropin

Abstract

Aims: This study evaluated the clinical, laboratory, ultrasonographic, histopathological, treatment, and follow-up characteristics of patients with molar pregnancy and assessed the clinical relevance of baseline factors associated with the development of postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) in a contemporary single-center cohort. Methods: This retrospective cohort included 259 patients with hydatidiform mole. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, ultrasonographic, histopathological, treatment, and follow-up data were reviewed. Patients with unknown GTN status were excluded from comparative analyses. Group comparisons used the Mann-Whitney U, Chi-square, or Fisher’s exact test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors independently associated with postmolar GTN development. Firth-penalized logistic regression and a sensitivity analysis restricted to patients with adequate follow-up were additionally performed to assess the robustness of the findings. Results: Among 259 patients, partial hydatidiform mole was diagnosed in 163 patients (62.9%), complete hydatidiform mole in 80 (30.9%), and hydatidiform mole of unspecified subtype in 16 (6.2%). Postmolar GTN developed in 39 patients (15.1%), while GTN status was unknown in 12 (4.6%). Chemotherapy was administered to 33 patients (12.7%); all received a methotrexate folinic acid regimen. Overall, normalization of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) was achieved in 247 patients (95.4%). In multivariable analysis, initial β-hCG level per 100.000 mIU/ml increase (adjusted OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.15-1.56; p<0.001) and the presence of a theca lutein cyst (adjusted OR, 9.05; 95% CI, 2.33-35.07; p=0.001) were independently associated with postmolar GTN development. These associations remained consistent in Firth-penalized logistic regression and in the sensitivity analysis restricted to patients with adequate follow-up. Conclusion: Established markers of trophoblastic burden, particularly higher initial β-hCG levels and the presence of theca lutein cysts, were independently associated with postmolar GTN in this contemporary cohort. The consistency of these associations across complementary analyses supports the clinical relevance of early biochemical and ultrasonographic assessment, while serial post-evacuation β-hCG surveillance remains the cornerstone of follow-up.

🔖

Cite This Article

Hazırbulan, A., Akman, R., Erkinüresin, T., Çiftpınar, T., Akbayir, O., Talmaç, M. A. (2026). Clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes, and factors associated with postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia in patients with hydatidiform mole: a single-center retrospective cohort study. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, Volume: 8 Issue: 6. https://ajindex.com/articles/1667876

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. Ngan HYS, Seckl MJ, Berkowitz RS, et al. Diagnosis and management of gestational trophoblastic disease: 2025 update. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025;171(S1):78-86. doi:10.1002/ijgo.70275
  2. Horowitz NS, Eskander RN, Adelman MR, Burke W. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of gestational trophoblastic disease: a Society of Gynecologic Oncology evidenced-based review and recommendation. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;163(3):605-613. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10.003
  3. Lok C, van Trommel N, Braicu EI, et al. Practical guidelines for the treatment of gestational trophoblastic disease: collaboration of the European Organisation for the Treatment of Trophoblastic Disease (EOTTD)-European Society of Gynaecologic Oncology (ESGO)-Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG)-International Society for the Study of Trophoblastic Diseases (ISSTD). J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(18):2119-2128. doi:10.1200/JCO-24-02326
  4. Cue L, Farci F, Ghassemzadeh S, Kang M. Hydatidiform mole. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2026. Updated December 11, 2024.
  5. Gonzalez J, Popp M, Ocejo S, Abreu A, Bahmad HF, Poppiti R. Gestational trophoblastic disease: complete versus partial hydatidiform moles. Diseases. 2024;12(7):159. doi:10.3390/diseases12070159
  6. Chawla T, Bouchard-Fortier G, Turashvili G, Osborne R, Hack K, Glanc P. Gestational trophoblastic disease: an update. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023;48(5):1793-1815. doi:10.1007/s00261-023-03820-5
  7. Lukinovic N, Malovrh EP, Takac I, Sobocan M, Knez J. Advances in diagnostics and management of gestational trophoblastic disease. Radiol Oncol. 2022;56(4):430-439. doi:10.2478/raon-2022-0038
  8. Piazzetta SR, Hoch KA, Benetti-Pinto CL, Yela DA. Assessment of risk factors associated with post-molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a retrospective cohort. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024;46:e-rbgo83. doi:10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo83
  9. Braga A, Coutinho L, Chagas M, et al. Molar pregnancy: early diagnosis, clinical management, and the role of referral centers. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025;15(15):1953. doi:10.3390/diagnostics15151953
  10. Joyce CM, Fitzgerald B, McCarthy TV, Coulter J, O’Donoghue K. Advances in the diagnosis and early management of gestational trophoblastic disease. BMJ Med. 2022;1(1):e000321. doi:10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000321
  11. Soper JT. Gestational trophoblastic disease: current evaluation and management. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(2):355-370. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000004240
  12. Tidy J, Seckl M, Hancock BW, on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of gestational trophoblastic disease. BJOG. 2021;128:e1-e27. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16266
  13. Hoeijmakers YM, Eysbouts YK, Massuger LFAG, et al. Early prediction of post-molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia and resistance to methotrexate, based on a single serum human chorionic gonadotropin measurement. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;163(3):531-537. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.09.016
  14. Cole LA. Biological functions of hCG and hCG-related molecules. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8:102. doi:10.1186/1477-7827-8-102
  15. Abu-Rustum NR, Yashar CM, Bean S, et al. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, version 2.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019;17(11):1374-1391. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2019.0053
  16. Subbaiah M, Radhakrishnan S, Dorairajan J. Efficacy and toxicity of 8 day methotrexate/folinic acid regimen in the management of low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a prospective observational study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2021;10(7):2744-2749. doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20212661
  17. Winter MC. Treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;74:67-80. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.006
  18. Zhou F, Kemin L. First-line monodrug chemotherapy in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a network meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 2024;13:1276771. doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1276771
  19. Osborne RJ, Filiaci VL, Schink JC, et al. Second curettage for low-risk nonmetastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(3):535-542. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001554
  20. Eiriksson L, Dean E, Sebastianelli A, et al. Guideline No. 408: management of gestational trophoblastic diseases. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021;43(1):91-105.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2020.03.001
  21. Albright BB, Myers ER, Moss HA, Ko EM, Sonalkar S, Havrilesky LJ. Surveillance for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia following molar pregnancy: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225(5):513.e1-513.e19. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.031
  22. Parker VL, Winter MC, Tidy JA, et al. PREDICT-GTN 2: two-factor streamlined models match FIGO performance in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol. 2024;180:152-159. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.11.017
  23. Parker VL, Winter MC, Tidy JA, et al. PREDICT-GTN 1: can we improve the FIGO scoring system in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia? Int J Cancer. 2023;152(5):986-997. doi:10.1002/ijc.34352