Journals / Ordu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2

In Vitro Responses of Different Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) Varieties to Drought Stress Induced by Polyethylene Glycol (PEG)

Polietilen Glikol (PEG) ile Oluşturulan Kuraklık Stresine Karşı Farklı Turp (Raphanus sativus L.) Çeşitlerinin İn Vitro Tepkileri

Ecem Kara(SİVAS BİLİM VE TEKNOLOJİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0118-2673
Pages
372–386
Publication Date
2025-12-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that increasing PEG concentration had a statistically significant negative effect on all evaluated parameters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to determine the morphological responses of two different radish varieties (Raphanus sativus L.) to artificial drought stress induced by using different levels of polyethylene glycol (PEG) under in vitro conditions.Kırmızı inci (TP1) and Chery belle (TP2) radish varietirs were used, and four PEG concentrations (0%, 2%, 4%, and 6%) were added to the Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal medium.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results indicated that increasing PEG concentration had a statistically significant negative effect on all evaluated parameters.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings suggest that higher PEG concentrations limit water uptake and cell elongation, leading to reduced metabolic activity in plants, while certain genotypes exhibit a greater tolerance capacity to water deficit conditions.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Raphanus sativus L. · polietilen glikol (PEG) · in vitro

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the morphological responses of two different radish varieties (Raphanus sativus L.) to artificial drought stress induced by using different levels of polyethylene glycol (PEG) under in vitro conditions.Kırmızı inci (TP1) and Chery belle (TP2) radish varietirs were used, and four PEG concentrations (0%, 2%, 4%, and 6%) were added to the Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal medium. The results indicated that increasing PEG concentration had a statistically significant negative effect on all evaluated parameters. As the PEG level increased, germination rate, root and shoot length, fresh and dry weights decreased. However, significant varietal differences were observed and the Kırmızı inci (TP1) variety exhibited higher values, particularly in shoot and root fresh/dry weight and germination rate, compared to Chery belle (TP2). The findings suggest that higher PEG concentrations limit water uptake and cell elongation, leading to reduced metabolic activity in plants, while certain genotypes exhibit a greater tolerance capacity to water deficit conditions.

Özet

Bu çalışma, iki farklı turp çeşidinin (Raphanus sativus L.) in vitro koşullarda farklı düzeylerde polietilen glikol (PEG) kullanılarak oluşturulan yapay kuraklık stresine verdikleri morfolojik tepkileri belirlemek amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada, Kırmızı inci (TP1) ve Chery belle (TP2) turp çeşitleri kullanılmış olup, PEG’in dört farklı konsantrasyonu (%0, %2, %4 ve %6) Murashige ve Skoog (MS) besin ortamına ilave edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar, PEG düzeyindeki artışın tüm incelenen parametreler üzerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde olumsuz etki oluşturduğunu göstermiştir. PEG konsantrasyonu yükseldikçe çimlenme oranı, kök ve gövde uzunluğu ile yaş ve kuru ağırlık değerleri azalmıştır. Bununla birlikte, çeşitler arasında belirgin farklılıklar gözlemlenmiş; Kırmızı inci (TP1) çeşidi, özellikle gövde ve kök yaş/kuru ağırlığı ile çimlenme oranı bakımından Chery belle (TP2) çeşidine kıyasla daha yüksek değerlere ulaşmıştır. Sonuçlar, artan PEG konsantrasyonlarının bitkilerde su alımını ve hücre uzamasını sınırlayarak metabolik faaliyetleri yavaşlattığını, ancak bazı genotiplerin bu strese karşı daha yüksek tolerans kapasitesine sahip olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kara, E. (2025). In Vitro Responses of Different Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) Varieties to Drought Stress Induced by Polyethylene Glycol (PEG). Ordu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2, 372–386. https://doi.org/10.54370/ordubtd.1804349

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (38)

  1. Adem E. İ. (2024). Bazı domates (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Çeşitlerinin In Vitro kuraklık stresi koşullarında performanslarının belirlenmesi [Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Sivas Bilim ve Teknoloji Üniversitesi.
  2. Ahmed, K., Shabbir, G., & Ahmed, M. (2025). Exploring drought tolerance for germination traits of diverse wheat genotypes at seedling stage: a multivariate analysis approach. BMC Plant Biology, 25(1), 390. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-06345-9
  3. Ashwin Bernald, G., Kingsly, N. J., Gokul, M., Ramchander, S., Joseph, P. A., & Kumar, D. (2023). Evaluating drought tolerance in rice through In-Vitro PEG screening and analysing the effectiveness of drought tolerant traits through correlation. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 15(9), 415-423.
  4. Baktemur, G., & Kara, E. (2025). Acur (Cucumis melo var. flexuosus) Bitkisinin kuraklık stresine karşı İn Vitro yanıtlarının araştırılması. 8. Uluslararası Akdeniz Bilimsel Araştırmalar ve İnovasyon Kongresi, 22-23 Ağustos 2025, Antalya, Türkiye, s. 286-293.
  5. Bouchyoua, A., Kouighat, M., Hafid, A., Ouardi, L., Khabbach, A., Hammani, K., & Nabloussi, A. (2024). Evaluation of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) genotypes for tolerance to PEG (polyethylene glycol) induced drought at germination and early seedling growth. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 15, 100928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.10092
  6. Bukan, M., Kereša, S., Pejić, I., Sudarić, A., Lovrić, A., & Šarčević, H. (2024). Variability of root and shoot traits under PEG-induced drought stress at an early vegetative growth stage of soybean. Agronomy, 14(6), 1188. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14061188
  7. Chishti, M. S., Shahbaz, M., Kaleem, M., Shafi, S., Mehmood, A., Qingzhu, Z., Mansha, M., Shehzadi, N., Rana, S., Shahid, H., Hashem, A., Alfagham, A., & Abd-Allah, E. F. (2025). Fertigation with alpha-tocopherol enhances morphological, physiological, and antioxidant responses in radish (Raphanus sativus L.) under drought stress. BMC Plant Biology, 25(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-06052-5
  8. Ergül, B. (2025). Yazlık Kabak (Cucurbita pepo L.) Çeşitlerinin In Vitro kuraklık stresi koşullarında tolerans düzeylerinin belirlenmesi [Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Sivas Bilim ve Teknoloji Üniversitesi.
  9. Gamba, M., Asllanaj, E., Raguindin, P. F., Glisic, M., Franco, O. H., Minder, B.,. & Muka, T. (2021). Nutritional and phytochemical characterization of radish (Raphanus sativus): A systematic review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 113, 205-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.04.045
  10. Hanász, A., Dobránszki, J., Mendler-Drienyovszki, N., Zsombik, L., & Magyar-Tábori, K. (2022). Responses of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Breeding Lines to Osmotic Stress Induced in In Vitro Shoot Culture. Horticulturae, 8(7), 591. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8070591
  11. Henschel, J. M., Dantas, E. F. O., de Azevedo Soares, V., Dos Santos, S. K., da Silva Gomes, D., Ferreira, L. M., Lopes, A. S., Dias, T. J., & Batista, D. S. (2023). Drought stress mitigation by foliar application of L-carnitine and its effect on radish morphophysiology. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 29(4), 579-590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-023-01308-6
  12. Kara, E., & Baktemur, G. (2025). Maydanoz bitkisinin In Vitro ortamda kuraklık koşullarına verdiği tepkilerin araştırılması. 8. Uluslararası Akdeniz Bilimsel Araştırmalar ve İnovasyon Kongresi, 22-23 Ağustos 2025, Antalya, Türkiye, pp. 278-285.
  13. Kara, E., Taşkın, H., & Baktemur, G. (2024). Farklı kuraklık dozlarının İn Vitro koşullarda rokanın (Eruca sativa L.) gelişimi üzerine etkisi. 8th International Halich Congress on Multidısciplinary Scientific Research. December 3-5, 2024, İstanbul, Türkiye, pp. 625-634.
  14. Khan, A. A., Wang, Y. F., Akbar, R., & Alhoqail, W. A. (2025). Mechanistic insights and future perspectives of drought stress management in staple crops. Frontiers in Plant Science, 16, 1547452. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1547452
  15. Kumar, S., Gulzar, M., Rajbhar, P., & Rajbhar, R. (2024). Advances in Breeding of Radish. Breeding Approaches In Vegetable Crops, 140.
  16. Mahpara, S., Zainab, A., Ullah, R., Kausar, S., Bilal, M., Latif, M. I., Arif, M., Akhtar, I., Al-Hashimi, A., Elshikh, M. S., Zivcak, M., & Zuan, A. T. K. (2022). The impact of PEG-induced drought stress on seed germination and seedling growth of different bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Plos one, 17(2), e0262937. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262937
  17. Manivannan, A., Kim, J. H., Kim, D. S., Lee, E. S., & Lee, H. E. (2019). Deciphering the nutraceutical potential of Raphanus sativus—A comprehensive overview. Nutrients, 11(2), 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11020402
  18. Mehmandar, M.N., Rasouli, F., Giglou, M.T., Zahedi, S.M., Hassanpouraghdam, M.B., Aazami, M.A., Tajaragh, R.P., Ryant, P., & Mlcek, J. (2023). Polyethylene glycol and sorbitol-mediated In Vitro screening for drought stress as an efficient and rapid tool to reach the tolerant Cucumis melo L. Genotypes. Plants, 12, 870. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040870
  19. Moura, L. M. D. F., da Costa, A. C., Vital, R. G., da Silva, A. A., Rodrigues, A. D. A., Cândido-Sobrinho, S. A., & Müller, C. (2022). Root traits in Crambe abyssinica Hochst and Raphanus sativus L. contribute to tolerance to water deficit. PeerJ, 10, e13595. https://peerj.com/articles/13595/
  20. Mozafari, A. A., Havas, F., & Ghaderi, N. (2018). Application of iron nanoparticles and salicylic acid in in vitro culture of strawberries (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) to cope with drought stress. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture,132(3), 511-523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-017-1347-8
  21. Murashige, T., & Skoog, F. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 15(3), 473-497. http://wolfe91.free.fr/MMBI/milieu%20MS/Murashige.pdf
  22. Muscolo, A., Sidari, M., Anastasi, U., Santonoceto, C., & Maggio, A. (2014). Effect of PEG-induced drought stress on seed germination of four lentil genotypes. Journal of Plant Interactions, 9(1), 354-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2013.835880
  23. Nour, M. M., Aljabi, H. R., AL-Huqail, A. A., Horneburg, B., Mohammed, A. E., & Alotaibi, M. O. (2024). Drought responses and adaptation in plants differing in life-form. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 12, 1452427. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2024.1452427
  24. Peršić, V., Ament, A., Antunović, Dunić, J., Drezner, G., & Cesar, V. (2022). PEG-induced physiological drought for screening winter wheat genotypes sensitivity-integrated biochemical and chlorophyll a fluorescence analysis. Front Plant Sci., 13, 987702. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.987702
  25. Rai, M. K., Kalia, R. K., Singh, R., Gangola, M. P., & Dhawan, A. K. (2011). Developing stress tolerant plants through in vitro selection—an overview. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 71(1), 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.10.021
  26. Sakthivelu, G., Akitha Devi, M. K., Giridhar, P., Rajasekaran, T., Ravishankar, G. A., Nedev, T., & Kosturkova, G. (2008). Drought-induced alterations in growth, osmotic potential and in vitro regeneration of soybean cultivars. General and Applied Plant Physiology, 34(1-2), 103-112. http://www.bio21.bas.bg/ippg/bg/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/08_pisa_1-2_103-112.pdf
  27. Seleiman, M. F., Al-Suhaibani, N., Ali, N., Akmal, M., Alotaibi, M., Refay, Y., Dindaroglu, T., Abdul-Wajid, H. H., & Battaglia, M. L. (2021). Drought stress impacts on plants and different approaches to alleviate its adverse effects. Plants, 10(2), 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020259
  28. Sivakumar, R., Devi, D. D., & Chandrasekar, C. N. (2014). In-vitro Screening of Tomato Genotypes for Drought Tolerance. Madras Agricultural Journal, 101.
  29. Stagnari, F., Galieni, A., D'Egidio, S., Pagnani, G., & Pisante, M. (2018). Responses of radish (Raphanus sativus) to drought stress. Annals of Agricultural Sciences, 63(2), 171-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12409
  30. Vuksanović, V., Kovačević, B., Kebert, M., Pavlović, L., Kesić, L., Čukanović, J., & Orlović, S. (2023). In vitro selection of drought-tolerant white poplar clones based on antioxidant activities and osmoprotectant content. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1280794. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1280794
  31. Wang, J., Li, Y., Zhu, F., Teng, Y., & Li, L. (2013). Physiological responses of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) to drought stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 35(10), 3079-3084. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12409
  32. Wang, X., Sun, H., Lian, X., Feng, J., Zhao, J., Wang, Y., & Liu, Y. (2024). Physiological and biochemical characteristics of cucumber seedlings under different levels of drought stress (PEG 6000 concentrations). Horticultural Science, 51(3). https://doi.org/10.17221/53/2023-HORTSCI
  33. Wickramasinghe, I. M., & Seran, T. H. (2019). Assessing in vitro germination and seedling growth of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) cv KC-1 in response to polyethylene glycol-induced water stress. Sri Lanka Journal of Food and Agriculture, 5(2), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.4038/sljfa.v5i2.72
  34. Wijerathna-Yapa, A., & Hiti-Bandaralage, J. (2023). Tissue culture—A sustainable approach to explore plant stresses. Life, 13(3), 780. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13030780
  35. Yadav, P.K., Bhujel, P., Bhandari, N., Sharma, S., & Sharma, A. (2025). Screening tomato genotypes for early-stage drought tolerance using polyethylene glycol-induced osmotic stress. BMC Plant Biol., 25(1), 1476. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-07508-4
  36. Yıldırım, E., Kılıçaslan, S.C., Ekinci, M., & Kul, R. (2020). Kuraklık stresinin fasulyede bitki gelişimi, bazı fizyolojik ve biyokimyasal özellikler üzerine etkisi. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 36(2), 264-273. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/erciyesfen/article/631065
  37. Zhu, H., Liu, M., Xu, H., Feng, D., & Sun, X. (2024). Effects of Salt Water on Growth and Quality of Raphanus sativus L. and Physiological Responses against Salt Stress. Agronomy, 14(6), 1190. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14061190
  38. Gamba, M., Asllanaj, E., Raguindin, P. F., Glisic, M., Franco, O. H., Minder, B.,. & Muka, T. (2021). Nutritional and phytochemical characterization of radish (Raphanus sativus): A systematic review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 113, 205-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.04.045