Journals / Uluslararası İslam Ekonomisi ve Finansı Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1

Profitability of Participation Banks and Sectoral Economic Growth: An Analysis on Türkiye

Katılım Bankalarının Karlılığı ve Sektörel Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Türkiye Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Ali Rauf Karataş(KARABÜK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1031-6722
Müşerref Arık(KTO KARATAY ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5334-8743
Melike Buse Akcan(ÇANAKKALE ONSEKİZ MART ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5101-1613
Pages
160–175
Publication Date
2026-03-20
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This situation has also demonstrated that the funds provided by participation banks operating in the Turkish banking sector have a positive impact on the industrial sector, both in terms of profitability and sector growth.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In economies with a bank-based financial system, banks are the primary institutions that perform the savings function of the financial system.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to empirically demonstrate the causal relationship between the profitability of participation banks in Türkiye and sectoral economic growth.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This situation has also demonstrated that the funds provided by participation banks operating in the Turkish banking sector have a positive impact on the industrial sector, both in terms of profitability and sector growth.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Finansal Sistem · Banka Karlılığı · Katılım Bankası

Abstract

In economies with a bank-based financial system, banks are the primary institutions that perform the savings function of the financial system. For this reason, the profitability of banks is an important indicator of soundness in an effectively functioning financial system. In this context, the relationship between bank profitability and economic growth is also important for the real sector. This study aims to empirically demonstrate the causal relationship between the profitability of participation banks in Türkiye and sectoral economic growth. To this end, quarterly data from the period 2005Q1-2024Q3 were used to test the relationship between the profitability of assets and equity capital of participation banks and the growth of GDP, agriculture, industry, services and construction sectors using the Fourier Toda-Yamamoto Causality Test. According to the findings obtained from the analysis, a statistically significant and bidirectional causal relationship has been found between the profitability of participation banks in Türkiye and GDP and industrial sector growth; and between equity profitability and growth in the agriculture, industry and construction sectors. This situation has also demonstrated that the funds provided by participation banks operating in the Turkish banking sector have a positive impact on the industrial sector, both in terms of profitability and sector growth.

Özet

Banka temelli finansal sisteme sahip ekonomilerde bankalar, finansal sistemin tasarruf işlevini yerine getiren temel kurumlardır. Bu nedenle, bankaların kârlılığı, etkin işleyen bir finansal sistemde sağlamlığın önemli bir göstergesidir. Bu bağlamda, banka kârlılığı ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki reel sektör açısından da önem taşımaktadır. Bu çalışma, Türkiye’deki katılım bankalarının kârlılığı ile sektörel ekonomik büyüme arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisini ampirik olarak ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaçla, 2005Q1-2024Q3 dönemine ait çeyreklik veriler kullanılarak, katılım bankalarının aktif ve özsermaye kârlılığı ile GSYH, tarım, sanayi, hizmetler ve inşaat sektörlerinin büyümesi arasındaki ilişki Fourier Toda-Yamamoto Nedensellik Testi ile analiz edilmiştir. Analizden elde edilen bulgulara göre, Türkiye’deki katılım bankalarının kârlılığı ile GSYH ve sanayi sektörü büyümesi arasında; özsermaye kârlılığı ile de tarım, sanayi ve inşaat sektörlerindeki büyüme arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ve çift yönlü bir nedensellik ilişkisi tespit edilmiştir. Bu durum, Türk bankacılık sektöründe faaliyet gösteren katılım bankalarının sağladığı fonların hem kârlılık hem de sektörel büyüme açısından sanayi sektörü üzerinde olumlu bir etkiye sahip olduğunu da ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karataş, A. R., Arık, M., Akcan, M. B. (2026). Profitability of Participation Banks and Sectoral Economic Growth: An Analysis on Türkiye. Uluslararası İslam Ekonomisi ve Finansı Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 160–175. https://doi.org/10.54427/ijisef.1823748

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. Afşar, A. (2007). Finansal gelişme ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 36, 188–198.
  2. Allen, F., Carletti, E., & Gu, X. (2008). The roles of banks in financial systems. J. Wilson. https://books.google.com/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=DA67BQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT76&dq=financial+system+and+banking&ots=BMUy5ixlVS&sig=C6AglVdzQNUrV-Pp4_crh70nAZc
  3. Asadullah, M. (2017). Determinants of profitability of Islamic banks of Pakistan–a case study on Pakistan’s Islamic banking sector. International Conference on Advances in Business, Management and Law (ICABML) 2017, 1. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dr-Muhammad-Asadullah/publication/323122191_Determinants_of_Profitability_of_Islamic_Banks_of_Pakistan_-_A_Case_Study_on_Pakistan's_Islamic_Banking_Sector/links/5ce7a9aea6fdccc9ddca77ea/Determinants-of-Profitability-of-Islamic-Banks-of-Pakistan-A-Case-Study-on-Pakistans-Islamic-Banking-Sector.pdf?_sg%5B0%5D=started_experiment_milestone&origin=journalDetail&_rtd=e30%3D
  4. Batır, T. E., & Güngör, B. (2016). Türkiye’de bankaların kârlılık belirleyicilerinin katılım bankaları ve mevduat bankaları bazında karşılaştırılması. Bankacılar Dergisi, 99, 74–98.
  5. Bozoklu, S., Yilanci, V., & Gorus, M. S. (2020). Persistence in per capita energy consumption: A fractional integration approach with a Fourier function. Energy Economics, 91, 104926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104926
  6. Dodi, D., Supiyadi, D., Arief, M., & Nugraha, N. (2018). Islamic Bank Profitability: A study of islamic bank in Indonesia. The International Journal of Business Review (The Jobs Review), 1(1), 51–62.
  7. Enders, W., & Lee, J. (2012). The flexible Fourier form and Dickey–Fuller type unit root tests. Economics Letters, 117(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.081
  8. Gazi, M. A. I., Karim, R., Senathirajah, A. R. bin S., Ullah, A. M. M., Afrin, K. H., & Nahiduzzaman, M. (2024). Bank-specific and macroeconomic determinants of profitability of Islamic Shariah-based banks: Evidence from new economic horizon using panel data. Economies, 12(3), 66.
  9. Ghroubi, M. (2025). Linkages between capital, bank financing and economic growth: The case of Islamic and conventional banks from a panel of Muslim countries. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 16(3), 585–607.
  10. Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.2307/1912791
  11. Hassan, M. K., & Bashir, A.-H. M. (2003). Determinants of Islamic banking profitability. 10th ERF Annual Conference, Morocco, 7(2), 45–60. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Baah-Kusi/post/if_i_am_researching_on_Islamic_banks_and_not_finding_the_literature_ca n_i_take_conventional_banks_LR_for_same_variables_but_different_intention/attachment/59d638e979197b80779961a4/AS%3A399336723763200%401472220702187/download/Determinants_of_Islamic_Banking_Profitability.pdf
  12. Imam, P., & Kpodar, K. (2016). Islamic banking: Good for growth? Economic Modelling, 59, 387–401.
  13. Islam, S., & Rana, M. S. (2019). Determinants of bank profitability: Evidence from commercial banks of Bangladesh. Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 9(2), 174.
  14. Klein, P.-O., & Weill, L. (2022). Bank profitability and economic growth. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 84, 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2022.01.009
  15. Patrick, H. T. (1966). Financial development and economic growth in underdeveloped countries. Economic development and Cultural change, 14(2), 174-189.
  16. Parlakkaya, R., Çürük, S. A., Kahraman, Ü., & Şen, G. (2020). Determination of factors affecting the profitability variables by panel data analysis in the islamic banks: The case of Turkey. Bilimname, 2020(42), 41–61.
  17. Ranciere, R., Tornell, A., & Westermann, F. (2008). Systemic crises and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(1), 359–406.
  18. Schumpeter, J. A. (1912). The Theory of Economic Development.(1934 Edition). Cambridge MA.
  19. Shamim, F., Aktan, B., Abdulla, M. A., & Sakhi, N. M. Y. (2018). Bank-specific vs. macro-economic factors: What drives profitability of commercial banks in Saudi Arabia. Banks & Bank Systems, 13, Iss. 1, 139–149.
  20. Stewart, R., Chowdhury, M., & Arjoon, V. (2021). Interdependencies between regulatory capital, credit extension and economic growth. Journal of Economics and Business, 117, 106010.
  21. Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01616-8
  22. Wasiuzzaman, S., & Tarmizi, H. (2010). Profitability of Islamic banks in Malaysia: An empirical analysis. Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance, 6(4), 53–68.
  23. Zarrouk, H., Ben Jedidia, K., & Moualhi, M. (2016). Is Islamic bank profitability driven by same forces as conventional banks? International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 9(1), 46–66.