SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Afet ve Risk Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3

Building Resilient Education Systems: A Thematic Synthesis of Post-Disaster Recovery Strategies

Tolga Çay(ÇAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6067-2242
Gürcan Demirogları(CAG UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-7645-5819
Pages
829–844
Publication Date
2025-11-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study concludes by proposing a holistic model of educational resilience and recommends that policymakers prioritize inclusive, trauma-sensitive, and system-wide strategies to better prepare schools for future disasters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to identify key components of effective post-disaster educational recovery by conducting a thematic synthesis of nine recent and methodologically robust qualitative studies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thematic analysis revealed four core domains essential to recovery: (1) structured mental health and psychosocial support, (2) teacher resilience and professional support, (3) community engagement for localized recovery, and (4) flexible curriculum design responsive to disrupted learning.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study concludes by proposing a holistic model of educational resilience and recommends that policymakers prioritize inclusive, trauma-sensitive, and system-wide strategies to better prepare schools for future disasters.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Community Engagement · Curriculum Adaptation · Educational Policy

Abstract

This study aims to identify key components of effective post-disaster educational recovery by conducting a thematic synthesis of nine recent and methodologically robust qualitative studies. The selected articles focus on educational systems in disaster-affected regions and reflect current developments in the field. Thematic analysis revealed four core domains essential to recovery: (1) structured mental health and psychosocial support, (2) teacher resilience and professional support, (3) community engagement for localized recovery, and (4) flexible curriculum design responsive to disrupted learning. Findings show that while mental health interventions are increasingly recognized, they are often temporary and insufficiently integrated into policy. Teachers, despite their central role in recovery, are frequently excluded from planning processes. Community collaboration emerges as a key driver of culturally relevant and sustainable education, while curriculum adaptability helps meet diverse student needs. The study concludes by proposing a holistic model of educational resilience and recommends that policymakers prioritize inclusive, trauma-sensitive, and system-wide strategies to better prepare schools for future disasters.

Özet

This study aims to identify key components of effective post-disaster educational recovery by conducting a thematic synthesis of nine recent and methodologically robust qualitative studies. The selected articles focus on educational systems in disaster-affected regions and reflect current developments in the field. Thematic analysis revealed four core domains essential to recovery: (1) structured mental health and psychosocial support, (2) teacher resilience and professional support, (3) community engagement for localized recovery, and (4) flexible curriculum design responsive to disrupted learning. Findings show that while mental health interventions are increasingly recognized, they are often temporary and insufficiently integrated into policy. Teachers, despite their central role in recovery, are frequently excluded from planning processes. Community collaboration emerges as a key driver of culturally relevant and sustainable education, while curriculum adaptability helps meet diverse student needs. The study concludes by proposing a holistic model of educational resilience and recommends that policymakers prioritize inclusive, trauma-sensitive, and system-wide strategies to better prepare schools for future disasters.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çay, T., Demirogları, G. (2025). Building Resilient Education Systems: A Thematic Synthesis of Post-Disaster Recovery Strategies. Afet ve Risk Dergisi, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3, 829–844. https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.1676628

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Alexander, D. (2018). Natural Disasters. Routledge.
  2. Alkhalaf, A., & Tanrıseven, I. (2025). Öğretmen Adaylarının Afet Bilinci Algı Düzeyine İlişkin Bir İnceleme. Afet ve Risk Dergisi, 8(1), 289-305. https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.1526119
  3. Basnet, B. K. (2020). Earthquake and Its Impacts on Education: Aftermath Nepal Quake 2015. The European Educational Researcher, 3(3), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.332
  4. Baumann, S. E., Merante, M. M., Sylvain-Holmgren, M. A., & Burke, J. G. (2021). Exploring Community Art and Its Role in Promoting Health, Social Cohesion, and Community Resilience in the Aftermath of the 2015 Nepal Earthquake. Health Promotion Practice, 22(1_suppl), 111S–121S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839921996083
  5. Bikar, S. S., Rathakrishnan, B., Kamaluddin, M. R., Che Mohd Nasir, N., & Mohd Nasir, M. A. (2021). Social Sustainability of Post-Disaster: How Teachers Enable Primary School Students to Be Resilient in Times of Ranau Earthquake. Sustainability, 13(13), 7308. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137308
  6. Bonanno, G. A., Brewin, C. R., Kaniasty, K., & La Greca, A. M. (2010). Weighing the Costs of Disaster: Consequences, Risks, and Resilience in Individuals, Families, and Communities. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100610387086 Buckland, J. (2005). Resilience of Education Systems: Strategies for Disaster Risk Reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 6(3), 215–227.
  7. Cox, R. S., Scannell, L., Heykoop, C., Tobin-Gurley, J., & Peek, L. (2017). Understanding Youth Disaster Recovery: The Vital Role of People, Places, and Activities. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 22, 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.011
  8. Dhungana, H., et al. (2017). Post-Earthquake Schooling in Nepal: Challenges and Opportunities. Education and Disaster Risk Reduction, 12(4), 77–89.
  9. Erol, M., & Özdemir, F. (2024). Returning to Education after the Earthquake in the Perspective of Teachers in Provinces Declared as Disaster Areas: Problems and Solution Suggestions. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 14(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1344573
  10. Henderson, N., & Milstein, M. M. (2003). Resiliency in Schools: Making It Happen for Students and Educators. Corwin Press.
  11. Izadkhah, Y. O., & Hosseini, M. (2005). Towards Resilient Schools in Earthquake-Prone Communities. International Journal of Risk Reduction, 7(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEM.2005.007355
  12. Kanadlı, S. (2019). A Meta-Summary of Qualitative Findings about STEM Education. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 959–976. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12162a
  13. Komatsu, H., & Rappleye, J. (2017). Disasters and Education in Developing Countries: A Meta-Analysis. Comparative Education Review, 61(3), 526–552.
  14. Masten, A. S. (2014). Global Perspectives on Resilience in Children and Youth. Child Development, 85(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12205
  15. Mizunoya, S., et al. (2019). Education in Emergencies: A Review of Policies and Practices. Global Education Monitoring Report, UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54676/EFLH5184
  16. Mutch, C. (2016). Schools as Communities and for Communities: Learning from the 2010–2011 New Zealand Earthquakes. School Community Journal, 26(1), 99–122.
  17. Nicholson, E., Murphy, T., Larkin, P., Normand, C., & Guerin, S. (2016). Protocol for a Thematic Synthesis to Identify Key Themes and Messages from a Palliative Care Research Network. BMC Research Notes, 9, 478. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2282-1
  18. Norris, F. H., et al. (2015). Socioeconomic Disparities in Post-Disaster Education Recovery. Disasters, 39(4), 719–746.
  19. Ormandy, S. (2014). Wellbeing and the Curriculum: One School’s Story Post-Earthquake. Teachers and Curriculum, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.15663/tandc.v14i1.88
  20. O’Toole, V. M., & Friesen, M. D. (2016). Teachers as First Responders in Tragedy: The Role of Emotion in Teacher Adjustment Eighteen Months Post-Earthquake. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.012
  21. Pratt, M., Fitzsimmons, P., & Christian, B. J. (2019). After the Earthquake: Adult Reflections on Adolescent Experiences of a Natural Disaster. TEACH Journal of Christian Education. https://doi.org/10.55254/1835-1492.1426
  22. Sianturi, R. S., Pamungkas, A., Elisiyah, I., Ferrajuanie, A., Putri, R. I., & Yusuf, M. (2020). Investigating the Response of Students with Disabilities to Earthquakes: Preliminary Results. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 562(1), Article 012010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/562/1/012010
  23. TASIP. (2025). Türkiye Afet Sonrası İyileştirme Programı (TASIP) Eğitim Bileşeni Raporu. Ministry of National Education, Republic of Türkiye.
  24. UNDRR. (2015). Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. https://www.preventionweb.net/files/43291_sendaiframeworkfordrren.pdf