SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2

On the Antebellum Abolitionist Stance Towards the United States Constitution: An Evaluation Regarding the Approaches of the American Anti-Slavery Society, William L. Garrison, and Frederick Douglass

İÇ SAVAŞ ÖNCESİ KÖLELİK KARŞITI HAREKETİN AMERİKAN ANAYASASINA BAKIŞI ÜZERİNE: AMERİKAN KÖLELİK KARŞITI TOPLULUĞU, WILLIAM L. GARRISON VE FREDERICK DOUGLASS’IN YAKLAŞIMLARI BAKIMINDAN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Ulaş Karadağ(ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, HUKUK FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-9775-5589
Pages
1227–1258
Publication Date
2026-10-21
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After examining how the pre-Civil War abolitionist constitutional debate was shaped by the rejection of the Constitution on one hand and a reformist approach that utilized the Union's constitutional possibilities to abolish slavery on the other, the study briefly evaluates the outcome of this process in terms of public law and human rights.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the strategic and theoretical approaches developed by the antebellum abolitionist movement toward the United States Constitution.
📊
Key Findings & Data:At the core of the study lies the legal tension between the commodity status of slavery in material life and the personhood status of it—allegedly left ambiguous by the Constitution to the benefit of slavery—as embodied in the tracts of the American Anti-Slavery Society.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After examining how the pre-Civil War abolitionist constitutional debate was shaped by the rejection of the Constitution on one hand and a reformist approach that utilized the Union's constitutional possibilities to abolish slavery on the other, the study briefly evaluates the outcome of this process in terms of public law and human rights.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kölelik Karşıtlığı · Amerikan Anayasası · Frederick Douglass

Abstract

This study examines the strategic and theoretical approaches developed by the antebellum abolitionist movement toward the United States Constitution. At the core of the study lies the legal tension between the commodity status of slavery in material life and the personhood status of it—allegedly left ambiguous by the Constitution to the benefit of slavery—as embodied in the tracts of the American Anti-Slavery Society. In this context, the fundamental rift that divided the movement is analyzed through William L. Garrison’s rejection of the Constitution as a covenant made with slaveholders and Frederick Douglass’s reformist constitutionalism, which reinterpreted the text as an anti-slavery founding document. The comparison reveals that, in contrast to the Garrisonian faction’s “No Union with Slaveholders” approach which rejected both the Constitution and the Union, Douglass developed a legal originalism that distinguished the Constitution from its administration and interpreted the constitutional text in favor of liberty. After examining how the pre-Civil War abolitionist constitutional debate was shaped by the rejection of the Constitution on one hand and a reformist approach that utilized the Union's constitutional possibilities to abolish slavery on the other, the study briefly evaluates the outcome of this process in terms of public law and human rights.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Amerikan İç Savaşı öncesinde kölelik karşıtı (abolisyonist) hareketin Amerika Birleşik Devletleri Anayasasına yönelik geliştirdiği farklı stratejik ve teorik yaklaşımları incelemektedir. Çalışmanın merkezinde, Amerikan Kölelik Karşıtı Topluluğu’nun risalelerinde somutlaşan; köleliğin maddi yaşamdaki meta statüsü ile Anayasanın kölecilik lehine belirsiz bıraktığı iddia edilen kişi statüsü arasındaki hukuksal gerilim yer almaktadır. Bu bağlamda, hareket içindeki temel kırılma, William Lloyd Garrison’un Anayasayı köle sahipleriyle yapılmış bir anlaşma olarak niteleyen reddiyesi ile Frederick Douglass’ın metni kölelik karşıtı kurucu bir belge olarak yeniden yorumlayan reformist anayasacılığı üzerinden analiz edilmektedir. Yapılan karşılaştırma sonucunda, Garrisoncu kanadın Anayasayı ve Birliği reddeden “köle sahipleriyle Birliğe hayır” yaklaşımına karşılık Douglass'ın, Anayasayı uygulamasından ayıran ve Anayasa metnini özgürlük lehine yorumlayan bir hukuki orijinalizm geliştirdiği saptanmaktadır. Çalışma, İç Savaş öncesi kölelik karşıtı hareketin Anayasa tartışmasının, Anayasanın radikal bir reddiyesi ile Birliğin anayasal imkanlarını köleliği tasfiye etmek için kullanan reformcu bir yaklaşım etrafında nasıl şekillendiğini inceledikten sonra, bu sürecin kamu hukuku ve insan hakları bakımından sonucunu kısaca değerlendirmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karadağ, U. (2026). On the Antebellum Abolitionist Stance Towards the United States Constitution: An Evaluation Regarding the Approaches of the American Anti-Slavery Society, William L. Garrison, and Frederick Douglass. Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2, 1227–1258. https://doi.org/10.58820/eruhfd.1954094

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. Aptheker, Herbert. American Revolution 1763-1783. A Marxist Interpretation. New York: International Publishers, 1967. American Anti-Slavery Society. “Anti-Slavery Tracts. First Series, Nos. 1-20”. (Erişim Tarihi 22.04.2026), https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/anti-slavery-tracts-first-series-nos-1-20-1855-56.
  2. American Anti-Slavery Society. “Anti-Slavery Tracts. No. 1. The United States Constitution”. (Erişim Tarihi 22.04.2026), https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/anti-slavery-tracts-first-series-nos-1-20-1855-56.
  3. American Anti-Slavery Society. “Anti-Slavery Tracts. No. 7. Revolution Only Remedy For Slavery”. (Erişim Tarihi 22.04.2026), https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/anti-slavery-tracts-first-series-nos-1-20-1855-56.
  4. Balkin, Jack M. ve Sanford Levinson. “Frederick Douglass as Constitutionalist”. Maryland Law Review. 83/1 (2023): 263-290.
  5. Barnett, Randy E. “Whence Comes Section One? The Abolitionist Origins of the Fourteenth Amendment”. Journal of Legal Analysis. 3/1 (2011): 165-263.
  6. Boonshoft, Mark. “Doughfaces at the Founding: Federalists, Anti-Federalists, Slavery, and the Ratification of the Constitution in New York”. New York History. 93/3 (2012): 187-225.
  7. Buck-Morss, Susan. Hegel, Haiti ve Evrensel Tarih, Çeviren Erkal Ünal. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları, 2012.
  8. Burdick, Charles K. Law of the American Constitution. Its Origin and Development. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1922.
  9. Calverton, Victor Francis. The Awakening of America. New York: The John Day Company, 1939.
  10. Case, Nelson. Constitutional History of the United States. New York: The Crow Press, 1904.
  11. Douglass, Frederick. The Anti-Slavery Movement. A Lecture. Rochester: Press of Lee, Mann & Co., 1855.
  12. Douglass, Frederick. “The American Constitution and the Slave: An Address Delivered in Glasgow, Scotland on March 26, 1860”. İçinde The Frederick Douglass Papers. Speeches, Debates, and Interviews Volume 3: 1855-1863. (Erişim Tarihi 22.04.2026), https://frederickdouglasspapersproject.com/s/digitaledition/item-set/9001.
  13. Douglass, Frederick. “The Constitution, The Union, and the Slavery”. İçinde Frederick Douglass. Selections from His Writings, ed. Philip S. Foner, 58-67. New York: International Publishers, 1945.
  14. Douglass, Frederick. “The Dred Scott Decision: An Address Delivered, in Part, in New York, New York, in May 1857”. İçinde The Frederick Douglass Papers. Speeches, Debates, and Interviews Volume 3: 1855-1863. (Erişim Tarihi 22.04.2026), https://frederickdouglasspapersproject.com/s/digitaledition/item-set/9001.
  15. Douglass, Frederick. “What Does July Fourth Mean to the Slave?”. İçinde Frederick Douglass. Selections from His Writings, ed. Philip S. Foner, 47-57. New York: International Publishers, 1945.
  16. Du Bois, W. E. Burghardt. Black Reconstruction. An Essay Toward a History of the Part Which Black Folk Played in the Attempt to Reconstruct Democracy in America, 1860-1880. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1935.
  17. Du Bois, W. E. Burghardt. The Philadelphia Negro. A Social Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007 [1896]. Finkelman, Paul. Slavery in the Courtroom. An Annotated Bibliography of American Cases. New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange, 1985.
  18. Finkelman, Paul. “Slavery in the United States. Persons or Property?”. İçinde The Legal Understanding of Slavery: From the Historical to the Contemporary, ed. Jean Allain, 105-134. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
  19. Foner, Philip S. “A Tribune of His People”. İçinde Frederick Douglass. Selections from His Writings, ed. Philip S. Foner, 7-32. New York: International Publishers, 1945.
  20. Garrison, William Lloyd. Thoughts on African Colonization. New York: Arno Press and The New York Times, 1969 [1832].
  21. Garrison, William Lloyd. “No Compromise with Slavery”. İçinde Against Slavery: An Abolitionist Reader, ed. Mason Lowance, 125-129. New York: Penguin Books, 2000 [1854].
  22. Garrison, William Lloyd. “The American Union”. İçinde William Lloyd Garrison and the Fight Against Slavery. Selections from the Liberator, ed. William E. Cain, 114-116. Boston: Bedford Books of St. Martin’s Press, 1995 [1845].
  23. Garrison, William Lloyd. “Truisms”. İçinde Against Slavery: An Abolitionist Reader, ed. Mason Lowance, 106-107. New York: Penguin Books, 2000 [1831].
  24. Glass, Maeve. “Slavery’s Constitution: Rethinking the Federal Consensus”. Fordham Law Review. 89/5 (2021): 1829-1883.
  25. Lynd, Staughton. Class Conflict, Slavery, and the United States Constitution. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Co., 1967.
  26. McDonald, Forrest. Novus Ordo Seclorum. The Intellectual Origins of the Constitution. Kansas: University Press of Kansas, 1985.
  27. Moses, Wilson J. “‘The Ever-Present Now’: Frederick Douglass’s Pragmatic Constitutionalism”. The Journal of African American History. 99/1-2 (2014): 73-86.
  28. Norton, Thomas James. The Constitution of the United States. Its Sources and Its Application. New York: The World Publishing, 1943.
  29. Oakes, James. The Crooked Path to Abolition. Abraham Lincoln and the Antislavery Constitution. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2022.
  30. Osborn, Ronald. “William Lloyd Garrison and the United States Constitution. The Political Evolution of an American Radical”. Journal of Law and Religion. 24/1 (2008): 65-88.
  31. Roberts, Dorothy. “Abolition Constitutionalism”. Harvard Law Review. 133/1 (2019): 1-122.
  32. Spooner, Lysander. The Address of the Free Constitutionalists to the People of the United States. Boston: Thayer & Eldridge, 1860.
  33. Spooner, Lysander. The Unconstitutionality of Slavery. Boston: Bela Marsh, 1860.
  34. Van Cleve, Georg William. A Slaveholders’ Union. Slavery, Politics, and the Constitution in the Early American Republic. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2010.
  35. Wilentz, Sean. No Property in Man. Slavery and Antislavery at the Nation’s Founding. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2018.
  36. Withridge, Arnold. No Compromise! The Story of the Fanatics Who Paved the Way to the Civil War. New York: Farrar, Straus and Cudahy, 1960.