Journals / KBB-Forum / 2020 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CLINICAL DATA OF THE PATIENTS WITH TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DYSFUNCTION

Journal
KBB-Forum
Pages
60–68
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Accurate analysis and appropriate treatment modality resulted in a significant reduction in pain intensity in patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) dysfunction is a common pathology in the population.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: 100 patients who were admitted to the Otorhinolaryngology Clinic were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Accurate analysis and appropriate treatment modality resulted in a significant reduction in pain intensity in patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) dysfunction is a common pathology in the population. This pathology, which may cause many different symptoms, adversely affects the quality of life. Therefore, its diagnosis and treatment are important. In this study, we aimed to retrospectively analyze the current complaints and findings of patients with TMJ dysfunction. Materials and Methods: 100 patients who were admitted to the Otorhinolaryngology Clinic were included in this study. Etiological factors, additional symptoms, examination findings, affected muscles and pain scores of the patients were examined. The clinical informations were compared with the findings of the examination. Different treatment modalities were recommended to the patients. Pain scores were re-analyzed after treatment. Results: Of the patients included in the study, 75 were female and 25 were male. 64% of the patients were affected by one side.Myofascial pain was the most common etiological factor. The most common findings were palpation tenderness and crepitation. Themasseter was the most affected muscle. The pain scores of the patients were 3.62 ± 2.21 (0-8; 4) and after the appropriate treatments decreased to 2.59 ± 1.61 (0-7; 2) (p <0.05). Conclusions: Temporomandibular joint dysfunction is a pathology caused by many etiologic factors and may lead to different findings. It is important to analyze the patient's current complaints and clinical findings in order to ensure appropriate treatment. Accurate analysis and appropriate treatment modality resulted in a significant reduction in pain intensity in patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜTÜK, S. G. (2020). A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CLINICAL DATA OF THE PATIENTS WITH TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DYSFUNCTION. KBB-Forum, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 60–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/164711

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Eroğlu CN, Tunç SK, Işık M, Elasan S. Prevalence of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Depression among the Individuals within Faculty of Dentistry, who Experienced Earthquake and who did not, and the Relation with Temporomandibular Joint Disorders. Van Med J 2017
  2. 100 2.Okeson JP, de Leeuw R. Differential diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders and other orofacial pain disorders. Dent Clin North Am 2011
  3. Manfredini D, Guarda-Nardini L, Winocur E, Piccotti F, Ahlberg J, Lobbezoo F. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of axis I epidemiologic findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011
  4. De Rossi SS, Greenberg MS, Liu F, Steinkeler A. Temporomandibular disorders: evaluation and management. Med Clin North Am 2014
  5. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, Look J, Anderson G, Goulet JP, et al. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Groupdagger. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2014
  6. 27 6.Murphy MK, MacBarb RF, Wong ME, Athanasiou KA. Temporomandibular disorders: a review of etiology, clinical management, and tissue engineering strategies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013
  7. e393-414 7.Farrar WB, McCarty WL, Jr. The TMJ dilemma. J Ala Dent Assoc 1979
  8. 26 8.Rugh JD, Solberg WK. Oral health status in the United States: temporomandibular disorders. J Dent Educ 1985
  9. Chisnoiu AM, Chisnoiu R, Moldovan M, Lascu LM, Picos AM. Etiological factors associated with temporomandibular joint disorder - study on animal model. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2016
  10. Johansson A, Unell L, Carlsson GE, Soderfeldt B, Halling A. Gender difference in symptoms related to temporomandibular disorders in a population of 50-year-old subjects. J Orofac Pain 2003
  11. 35 11.Ferreira CL, Silva MA, Felicio CM. Signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in women and men. Codas 2016
  12. Donovan TE, Anderson M, Becker W, Cagna DR, Carr GB, Albouy JP, et al. Annual Review of selected dental literature: report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 2013
  13. DM SBL. The Temporomandibular Joint: A biological basis for clinical practice. 4th ed Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1992:163-78 14.Poluha RL, Grossmann E, Iwaki L