Journals / Din ve İnsan Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 10

Digital Transcendence Theory: The Spatio-Virtual Reconstruction of Religious Experience in the Post-secular Society

Dijital Transcendans Kuramı: Post-seküler Toplumda Dinî Deneyimin Sanal-Mekânsal Yeniden İnşası

Arif Akbaş(SİVAS CUMHURİYET ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8480-4350
Pages
230–258
Publication Date
2025-12-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, digital transcendence symbolizes not only a technological innovation but also an epistemological and ontological transformation of religious life.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to develop the “Digital Transcendence Theory” by analyzing the transformation of religious experience in the post-secular society, where digitalization has accelerated, and religion has regained visibility in public and social life, allowing for the coexistence of religious and secular values within a new societal and intellectual framework.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Timeless prayers and spaceless rituals illustrate how transcendence has taken on digital forms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, digital transcendence symbolizes not only a technological innovation but also an epistemological and ontological transformation of religious life.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Din sosyolojisi · Dijital kutsallık · Algoritmik inanç

Abstract

This study aims to develop the “Digital Transcendence Theory” by analyzing the transformation of religious experience in the post-secular society, where digitalization has accelerated, and religion has regained visibility in public and social life, allowing for the coexistence of religious and secular values within a new societal and intellectual framework. Technological advancements such as virtual reality, augmented reality, and artificial intelligence–powered platforms are reshaping the spatial, temporal, and symbolic structures of traditional religious practices, thereby producing a novel experience of transcendence. Within this context, the study hypothesizes that religious rituals have been detached from physical spaces and reconstituted in virtual environments, where individual and algorithmic representations introduce new modes of relating to the sacred. This analysis is structured within a qualitative research paradigm; the data set comprises examples drawn from digital worship platforms, online pilgrimage simulations, and AI-based prayer applications. Through descriptive analysis, the structural and experiential characteristics of digital ritual practices are examined, followed by theoretical modeling to construct the conceptual foundation of the “digital transcendence” concept. The study concludes that virtual spaces function not merely as representations but also as producers of new forms of sacredness, and that digitalization redefines the experience of transcendence within religious life. This theory aims to contribute to the sociology of religion literature by foregrounding digitalization as a critical axis of transformation. The virtual is no longer merely a shadow of reality but constitutes a simulation of new sacredness. In the digitalized world, humanity has increasingly alienated itself. Timeless prayers and spaceless rituals illustrate how transcendence has taken on digital forms. These changes extend beyond individual religious experience, fostering the emergence of collective virtual communities. Digital environments enable the reinterpretation of traditional worship practices and the emergence of new layers of meaning across diverse cultural contexts. Moreover, the role of algorithms in producing religious content facilitates the personalization and diversification of faith practices. Thus, digital transcendence symbolizes not only a technological innovation but also an epistemological and ontological transformation of religious life.

Özet

Bu çalışma, dijitalleşmenin hız kazandığı post-seküler toplumda [Dinin kamusal alanda ve toplumsal hayatta yeniden görünür olduğu; din ile seküler değerlerin birlikte var olabileceği yeni bir toplumsal, düşünsel durumu anlatır.] dinî deneyimin geçirdiği dönüşümü analiz ederek, “Dijital Transcendans Kuramı”nı ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Sanal gerçeklik, artırılmış gerçeklik ve yapay zekâ destekli platformlar gibi teknolojik gelişmeler, geleneksel dinî pratiklerin mekânsal, zamansal ve sembolik yapılarını dönüştürmekte; yeni bir aşkınlık deneyimi üretmektedir. Bu bağlamda çalışma, dinî ritüellerin fiziksel mekânlardan koparılarak sanal ortamlarda yeniden üretildiği, bireysel ve algoritmik temsillerin kutsal olanla ilişkilenmede yeni bir yol açtığı hipotezine dayanmaktadır. Bu çözümleme, nitel araştırma paradigması çerçevesinde yapılandırılmış; veri seti, dijital ibadet platformları, çevrim içi hac simülasyonları ve yapay zekâ tabanlı dua uygulamalarından elde edilen örnekler üzerinden oluşturulmuştur. Betimsel analiz yoluyla dijital ritüel pratiklerinin yapısal ve deneyimsel özellikleri çözümlenmiş; ardından kuramsal modelleme yöntemiyle “dijital transcendans” kavramının teorik zemini inşa edilmiştir. Çalışmanın sonucunda, sanal mekânların sadece temsil olmadığı, bununla birlikte yeni bir kutsallık üretme işlevi gördüğü saptanmış; dijitalleşmenin dinî yaşamda aşkınlık deneyimini yeniden tanımladığı ortaya konmuştur. Bu kuram, din sosyolojisi literatürüne dijitalleşme eksenli bir katkı sunmayı hedeflemektedir. Sanal olan, yalnızca gerçekliğin gölgesi olmaktan ziyade; yeni kutsallığın simülasyonudur. Dijitalleşen dünyada insan artık kendisine iyice yabancılaşmıştır. Zaman dışı dualar, mekân dışı ritüellerle: Transcendans dijital biçimlere bürünmüştür. Değişim ve dönüşüm, dinî deneyimin bireysel sınırlarının ötesine geçerek kolektif bir sanal topluluğun oluşmasına da zemin hazırlamaktadır. Dijital ortamlar, geleneksel ibadet pratiklerinin yeniden yorumlanmasına ve farklı kültürel bağlamlarda yeni anlam katmanlarının ortaya çıkmasına olanak tanımaktadır. Ayrıca, algoritmaların dinî içerik üretiminde rol oynaması, inanç pratiklerinin kişiselleştirilmesi ve çeşitlendirilmesini mümkün kılmaktadır. Böylece, dijital transcendans sadece teknolojik bir yenilik olmaktan öte, aynı şekilde dinî yaşantının epistemolojik ve ontolojik dönüşümünü simgelemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akbaş, A. (2025). Digital Transcendence Theory: The Spatio-Virtual Reconstruction of Religious Experience in the Post-secular Society. Din ve İnsan Dergisi, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 10, 230–258. https://doi.org/10.69515/dinveinsan.1704790

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. Alić, S. (2019). Secondary sacredness sacredness in an information-communication era. Philosophy International Journal, 2(2), 1-9.
  2. Alkhouri, K. I. (2024). Exploring the interplay of cybersecurity practices and religious psychological beliefs in the digital age. Theophany, 6, 25- 57. http://dx.doi.org/10.26247/theophany.2629
  3. Andrau, P. Y. (2008). Aspects of two media models: France and the United Kingdom and EU media governance. Information and Public Choice (ss. 177-197). World Bank Publications.
  4. Battista, D. (2024). The digital as sacred space: exploring the online religious dimension. Academicus International Scientific Journal, 15(29), 21-37. Baudrillard, J., & Glaser, S. F. (1994). Simulacra and simulation (Vol. 312). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan press.
  5. Baumer, E. P. S., Taylor, A. S., Brubaker, J. R., & McGee, M. (2024). Algorithmic subjectivities. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 31(3), Madde 35, 1- 34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3660344
  6. Bhagavan, B. S. S. (2024). Transcending boundaries: the intersection of posthuman spirituality and techno-spiritualism. In the critical posthumanities (ss. 162-175). Shashwat Publication. Boz, N., & Erşahin, Z. (2023). Digital Media and the sacred. İçinde The Routledge Handbook of Language and Religion (ss. 39-52). Routledge.
  7. Braidotti, R. (2017). Critical posthuman knowledges. South Atlantic Quarterly, 116(1), 83-96. Brasher, B. E. (2004). Give me that online religion. Rutgers University Press. Brassier, R. (2001). Alien theory: The decline and fall of materialism in the name of matter [Doktora Tezi, University of Warwick]. University of Warwick Research Archive Portal.
  8. Campbell, H. A. & Tsuria, R. (2020). Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in digital media. Routledge.
  9. Cheong, P. H. (2016). The vitality of new media and religion: Communicative perspectives, practices, and changing authority in spiritual organization. New Media & Society, 19(1), 25- 33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816649913 Delicata, N. (2008). Marshall McLuhan: Media ecologist and educator. Ultimate reality and meaning, 31(4), 314-341.
  10. Eliade, M. (1959). The sacred and the profane: the nature of religion (W. R. Trask, Trans.). Harcourt, Brace & World.
  11. Floridi, L. (2014). The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford University Press. Flynn, T. R. (1985). Truth and subjectivation in the later Foucault. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(10), 531–540. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026360
  12. Glymour, B. (2000). Data and phenomena: a distinction reconsidered. Erkenntnis (1975), 52(1), 29–37. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20012966
  13. Goldstein, W. S. (2009). Patterns of secularization and religious rationalization in Emile Durkheim and Max Weber. Implicit Religion, 12(2), 135-163.
  14. Graham, E. (2021). Cyborg or goddess? Religion and posthumanism from secular to postsecular. Journal of Posthumanism, 1(1), 23-31.
  15. Grieve, G. P., & Veidlinger, D. M. (Eds.). (2014). Buddhism, the internet, and digital media: the pixel in the lotus. Routledge.
  16. Grishakova, M. (2023). Intermediality as a material practice and artistic event. İçinde The Routledge Companion to Literary Media (pp. 34-48). Routledge.
  17. Güdükbay, U., Erol, F., & Erdogan, N. (2000). Beyond tradition and modernity: digital shadow theater. Leonardo, 33(4), 264–265. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1576897 Hahn, K. (2021). Social digitalisation: Persistent transformations beyond digital technology. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79867-3
  18. Hayes, L. V. (2020). Hybrid networks of practice: how online spaces extend faith-based communities of practice. The Pennsylvania State University.
  19. Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.
  20. Helland, C. (2005). Online religion as lived religion: Methodological issues in the study of religious participation on the internet. Online – Heidelberg Journal of Religions on the Internet, 1(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.11588/rel.2005.1.380. Hoover, S. M., & Echchaibi, N. (Eds.). (2021). Media and religion: The global view. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110497878.
  21. Hutchings, T. (2019). Creating church online: ritual, community and new media. Routledge. Hutchings, T. (2019). Emotion, ritual and rules of feeling in the study of digital religion. İçinde A.
  22. Possamai-Inesedy & A. Nixon (Ed.), The Digital Social: Religion and Belief (ss. 110-129). Jacobs, S. (2007). Virtually sacred: The performance of asynchronous cyber-rituals in online spaces. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), 1103-1121. Jati, W. (2023). Hijrah phenomenon among Indonesian Muslim middle class: Current Causes & Challenges. Al-Qalam, 29(2), 363-372. Karaflogka, A. (2002). Religious discourse and cyberspace. Religion, 32(4), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1006/reli.2002.0405
  23. Lövheim, M., & Campbell, H. A. (2017). Considering critical methods and theoretical lenses in digital religion studies. New Media & Society, 19(1), 5- 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816649911
  24. Mariański, J., & Wargacki, S. (2015). The liquid sacred in postmodern society. Przegla̜d Religioznawczy, 4(258), 81-101.
  25. Mittleman, A. (2015). The Problem of holiness. Journal of Analytic Theology, 3, 29-46. Müller, J. & Friemel, T. N. (2024). Dynamics of digital media use in religious communities—A Theoretical Model. Religions. 15(7):762. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15070762 O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown Publishing Group.
  26. Possamai, A. (2018). The i-zation of society, religion, and neoliberal post-secularism. Palgrave Macmillan Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5942-1 Reyman, J., & Sparby, E. M. (Ed.). (2019). Digital ethics. Taylor & Francis.
  27. Roese, V. (2018). You won't believe how co-dependent they are: Or: Media hype and the interaction of news media, social media, and the user. İçinde P. Vasterman (Ed.), From Media Hype to Twitter Storm (ss. 313-332). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt21215m0.19
  28. Sandu, A. (2020). Pandemic-catalyst of the virtualization of the social space. Postmodern Openings, 11(1 Sup 2), 115-140. Shanahan, J. (2016). Digital transcendentalism in David Mitchell’s cloud atlas. Criticism, 58(1),.115-145
  29. Ståhl, T., Sormunen, E., & Mäkinen, M. (2021). Epistemic beliefs and internet reliance–is algorithmic authority part of the picture?. Information and Learning Sciences, 122(11/12),.726-748
  30. Starodub, A. (2015). Post-representational epistemology in practice: Processes of relational knowledge creation in autonomous social movements. Interface: A Journal for and About Social Movements, 7(2), 161–191.
  31. Stiegler, B. (2016). The Age of Disruption: Technology and Madness in Computational Capitalism. Polity Press.
  32. Strub, H. (1989). The theory of Panoptical control: Bentham’s Panopticon and Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 25(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(198901)25:1.
  33. Taylor, N., & Hamilton, L. (2014). Investigating the other: Considerations on multi-species research. İçinde Big Data? Qualitative Approaches to Digital Research (ss. 251-271). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  34. Wagner, R. (2012). First-person shooter religion: Algorithmic culture and inter-religious encounter. CrossCurrents, 62(2), 181–203. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24461836
  35. Sandu, A. (2020). Pandemic-catalyst of the virtualization of the social space. Postmodern Openings, 11(1 Sup 2), 115-140. Shanahan, J. (2016). Digital transcendentalism in David Mitchell’s cloud atlas. Criticism, 58(1),.115-145
  36. Ståhl, T., Sormunen, E., & Mäkinen, M. (2021). Epistemic beliefs and internet reliance–is algorithmic authority part of the picture?. Information and Learning Sciences, 122(11/12),.726-748