SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dicle Dental Journal / 2023 / Volume: 24 Issue: 3

Prevalence of Dental Anomaly in Children in Elazığ Province

Elazığ İlinde Bulunan Çocuklarda Dental Anomali Görülme Prevalansı

Merve Daldal(fırat üniversitesi diş hekimliği fakültesi)0000-0002-1767-3311
Sümeyye Coşgun Baybars(FIRAT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-4166-3754
Elif Ok
Pages
—
Publication Date
2023-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, it is essential for dentists to have sufficient knowledge about dental anomalies and to detect the presence of dental anomalies at an early stage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: In this study, Orthopantomography images of 1500 patients aged 5-14 years who applied to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology for various reasons were examined by retrospective scanning.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: Among the patients with dental anomalies, missing teeth were observed in 3.7%, supernumerary teeth in 0.8%, taurodontism in 9.7%, lateral wedge in 2.7%, fusion was observed in only one patient, and no patient with gemination was observed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, it is essential for dentists to have sufficient knowledge about dental anomalies and to detect the presence of dental anomalies at an early stage.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dental anomaly · tooth deficiency · fusion

Abstract

Aim: In this study, Orthopantomography images of 1500 patients aged 5-14 years who applied to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology for various reasons were examined by retrospective scanning. In patients’ permanent incisors and molars, It is aimed to evaluate the presence of supernumerary teeth, taurodont teeth, missing teeth, wedge lateral, fusion, and gemination. Material and Method: Congenital tooth deficiencies, supernumerary teeth, taurodontism, fusion, gemination, and wedge lateral teeth identified on panoramic radiographs were evaluated according to the patient’s age, gender, localization, number, and morphology. Results: Among the patients with dental anomalies, missing teeth were observed in 3.7%, supernumerary teeth in 0.8%, taurodontism in 9.7%, lateral wedge in 2.7%, fusion was observed in only one patient, and no patient with gemination was observed. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence rates of each dental anomaly between genders (p>0.05). However, among the age groups, the incidence of dental anomalies in the 10-14 age group (44.7%) was significantly higher than the other age groups (p 0.05). Conclusion: Dental anomalies are pretty common and often do not cause symptoms. Therefore, it is essential for dentists to have sufficient knowledge about dental anomalies and to detect the presence of dental anomalies at an early stage.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, Ağız, Diş ve Çene Radyolojisi Anabilim Dalı’na çeşitli sebeplerle başvuran, 5-14 yaş grubu 1500 hastanın Ortopantomografi görüntüleri retrospektif tarama ile incelenmiştir. Hastaların daimi kesici ve azı dişlerindeki; sürnümerer diş, taurodont diş, diş eksikliği, kama lateral, füzyon ve geminasyon varlığının değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Panoramik radyograflarda belirlenen konjenital diş eksiklikleri, sürnümerer dişler, taurodontizm, füzyon, geminasyon, kama lateral dişler hastanın yaş, cinsiyet, lokalizasyon, sayı ve morfolojilerine göre değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Dental anomali tespit edilen hastaların, %3,7 sinde diş eksikliği, %0,8 sinde sürnümerer diş, %9,7 sinde taurodontizm, %2,7 ünde kama lateral, sadece bir hastada füzyon görülürken geminasyonu olan hastaya rastlanmadı. Cinsiyetler arasında dental anomalilerin her birinin görülme oranlarında istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmadı (p>0,05) Ancak yaş grupları arasında 10-14 yaş grubunda dental anomali görülme oranı (%44,7), anlamlı derecede diğer yaş gruplarından yüksek tespit edildi (p 0,05). Sonuç: Dental anomaliler oldukça yaygın görülen ve çoğu zaman semptom vermeyen oluşumlardır. Bu yüzden diş hekimlerinin dental anomaliler hakkında yeterli bilgi sahibi olması ve erken evrede dental anomali varlığının tespit edilmesi önemlidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Daldal, M., Baybars, S. C., Ok, E. (2023). Prevalence of Dental Anomaly in Children in Elazığ Province. Dicle Dental Journal, Volume: 24 Issue: 3. https://ajindex.com/articles/1643288

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. Küçükçeşmen C. Konik Diş Anomalisi bulunan üç farklı olgunun, kompozit veneer restorasyonlarda estetik ve fonksiyonel tedavisi. Ankara Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg, 2005;32 (3):215-21.
  2. Brook AH. Multilevel complex interactions between genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors in the aetiology of anomalies of dental development. Arch Oral Biol. 2009;54 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3-S17. doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2009.09.005
  3. Garib DG, Alencar BM, Lauris JR, Baccetti T. Agenesis of maxillary lateral incisors and associated dental anomalies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(6):732.e1-733. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.12.024
  4. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology principles;uid interpretation, 4th edn. Mosby Co., St. Louis, 2000, pp.205.
  5. Cholitgul W, Drummond BK. Jaw and tooth abnormalities detected on panoramic radiographs in New Zealand children aged 10-15 years. N Z Dent J. 2000;96(423):10-13.
  6. Özveren N, Tekbaş Atay M. Trakya Bölgesi’ndeki çocuk hastalarda görülen dental anomali tipleri ve prevalansları. Türkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci. 2020;26(3):362-70.
  7. Lam EWN. Dental Anomalies. In: White SC, Pharoah MJ, eds. Oral Radiology: Prin-ciples and Interpretation. 6th ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby Elsevier; 2009.p.295-324.
  8. Koparal M, Ünsal HY, Türker Alan H, Yalçın M, Ege B, Gülsün B. Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi’nde yedi farklı dental anomalinin görülme sıklığı. Selçuk Dent J 2016;5.135-1-1.
  9. Kim MJ, Song JS, Kim YJ, Kim JW, Jang KT, Hyun HK. Clinical Considerations for Dental Management of Children with Molar-Root Incisor Malformations. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020;44(1):55-59. doi:10.17796/1053-4625-44.1.10
  10. Uslu O, Akcam MO, Evirgen S, Cebeci I. Prevalence of dental anomalies in various malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135(3):328-335. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.030
  11. Uzamış M, Taner TU, Kansu O, Alpar R. Evaluation of dental anomalies in 6-13 year old Turkish children: a panoramic survey. J Marmara Univ Dent Fac 2001;4:254-9.
  12. Benediktsdottir IS, Hintze H, Petersen JK, Wenzel A. Accuracy of digital and film panoramic radiographs for assessment of position and morphology of mandibular third molars and prevalence of dental anomalies and pathologies. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2003;32(2):109-115. doi:10.1259/dmfr/15999089
  13. Saberi EA, Ebrahimipour S. Evaluation of developmental dental anomalies in digital panoramic radiographs in Southeast Iranian Population. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016;6(4):291-295. doi:10.4103/2231-0762.186804
  14. Gupta SK, Saxena P, Jain S, Jain D. Prevalence and distribution of selected developmental dental anomalies in an Indian population. J Oral Sci. 2011;53(2):231-238. doi:10.2334/josnusd.53.231
  15. Guttal KS, Naikmasur VG, Bhargava P, Bathi RJ. Frequency of developmental dental anomalies in the Indian population. Eur J Dent. 2010;4(3):263-269.
  16. Garn SM, Lewis AB, Vicinus JH. Third molar polymorphism and its significance to dental genetics. J Dent Res. 1963;42:SUPPL1344-SUPPL1363. doi:10.1177/00220345630420061001
  17. Endo T, Ozoe R, Kubota M, Akiyama M, Shimooka S. A survey of hypodontia in Japanese orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129(1):29-35. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.024
  18. Neville BW, Douglas D, Allen CM, et al. Oral and maxillofacial pathology. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Saunders. 2009.
  19. Scheiwiller M, Oeschger ES, Gkantidis N. Third molar agenesis in modern humans with and without agenesis of other teeth. PeerJ. 2020;8:e10367. Published 2020 Nov 17. doi:10.7717/peerj.10367
  20. Kenneth M. Goodis, Harold E. Seltzer and Bender’s dental pulp, 2nd ed. Quintessence pub History. 2002;11(1).
  21. Sarr M, Toure B, Kane AW, Fall F, Wone MM. Le taurodontisme et la dent pyramidale au niveau molaire. Prévalence chez le Sénégalais âgé de 15 à 19 ans [Taurodontism and the pyramidal tooth at the level of the molar. Prevalence in the Senegalese population 15 to 19 years of age]. Odontostomatol Trop. 2000;23(89):31-34.
  22. MacDonald-Jankowski DS, Li TT. Taurodontism in a young adult Chinese population. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1993;22(3):140-144. doi:10.1259/dmfr.22.3.8299833
  23. Darwazeh AM, Hamasha AA, Pillai K. Prevalence of taurodontism in Jordanian dental patients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1998;27(3):163-165. doi:10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600342
  24. Alberti G, Mondani PM, Parodi V. Eruption of supernumerary permanent teeth in a sample of urban primary school population in Genoa, Italy. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2006;7(2):89-92.
  25. Pereira AJ, Fidel RA, Fidel SR. Maxillary lateral incisor with two root canals: fusion, gemination or dens invaginatus?. Braz Dent J. 2000;11(2):141-146.
  26. Buenviaje TM, Rapp R. Dental anomalies in children: a clinical and radiographic survey. ASDC J Dent Child. 1984;51(1):42-46.
  27. Hagman FT. Anomalies of form and number, fused primary teeth, a correlation of the dentitions. ASDC J Dent Child. 1988;55(5):359-361.
  28. Küçüküçerler B. Pedodonti. Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Yayınları, Sayı 9. 1978;264-71.
  29. Kotsomitis N, Freer TJ. Inherited dental anomalies and abnormalities. ASDC J Dent Child. 1997;64(6):405-408.
  30. Koch G, Modeer T, Poulsen S, Rasmussen P. Pedodontics-a clinical approach. 1st ed. Munksgaard, Copenhagen. 1994;251-7.