SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty / 2024 / Volume: 11 Issue: 4

Migration Governance from an Institutional Perspective: An Index for “Good” Migration Governance

Hakan Karabacak(ANKARA SOSYAL BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6321-088X
Yaşar Köse(TÜRK HAVA KURUMU ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İŞLETME FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-0073-2095
Melike Aktaş Bozkurt(OSTIM TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-5207-0615
Pages
—
Publication Date
2024-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

IGMG aims to raise the awareness of organizations on migration policies and practices and enable them to take the necessary steps for good migration governance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The widespread socio-economic effects of migration make migration governance critical from an administrative and institutional perspective.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These principles are contained in documents published by the World Bank, the United Nations or the International Monetary Fund, which have made significant contributions to the development of good governance principles.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:IGMG aims to raise the awareness of organizations on migration policies and practices and enable them to take the necessary steps for good migration governance.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Migration · Good Governance · Migration Governance Index

Abstract

The widespread socio-economic effects of migration make migration governance critical from an administrative and institutional perspective. Based on good governance principles, this article develops an Index for Good Migration Governance (IGMG). For this purpose, five principles of good governance (effectiveness, transparency, accountability, participation and legal framework) were selected. These principles are contained in documents published by the World Bank, the United Nations or the International Monetary Fund, which have made significant contributions to the development of good governance principles. The index is calculated using the methodology used by the European Commission in business and consumer surveys. Unlike the migration indexes developed in the past, IGMG builds on the selected principles of good governance from an institutional perspective and focuses on institutional structures related to migration governance. IGMG aims to raise the awareness of organizations on migration policies and practices and enable them to take the necessary steps for good migration governance.

Özet

The widespread socio-economic effects of migration make migration governance critical from an administrative and institutional perspective. Based on good governance principles, this article develops an Index for Good Migration Governance (IGMG). For this purpose, five principles of good governance (effectiveness, transparency, accountability, participation and legal framework) were selected. These principles are contained in documents published by the World Bank, the United Nations or the International Monetary Fund, which have made significant contributions to the development of good governance principles. The index is calculated using the methodology used by the European Commission in business and consumer surveys. Unlike the migration indexes developed in the past, IGMG builds on the selected principles of good governance from an institutional perspective and focuses on institutional structures related to migration governance. IGMG aims to raise the awareness of organizations on migration policies and practices and enable them to take the necessary steps for good migration governance.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karabacak, H., Köse, Y., Bozkurt, M. A. (2024). Migration Governance from an Institutional Perspective: An Index for “Good” Migration Governance. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, Volume: 11 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1405045

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (34)

  1. Aksoy, C. G., & Tumen, S. (2021). Local governance quality and the environmental cost of forced migration. Journal of Development Economics, 149, 102603, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102603
  2. Batista, C., & Vicente, P. C. (2011). Do migrants improve governance at home? Evidence from a voting experiment. The World Bank Economic Review, 25(1), 77-104. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhr009
  3. Betts, A. (2011). Global Migration Governance. Oxford University Press.
  4. Betts, A., & Kainz, L. (2017). The history of global migration governance (Vol. 122). Refugee Studies Centre, Oxford Department of International Development, University of Oxford.
  5. Brautigam, D. (1991). Governance and economy: A review.
  6. Chaudhary, D. (2020). Prospect of good governance and human development in Nepal. Open Journal of Political Science, 10(2), 135-147. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2020.102010
  7. Cornelissen, J. (2019). Kurumsal iletişim (Çev. Ed.: Ç. S. Bir & İ. K. Suher). The Kitap.
  8. Crépeau, F., & Atak, I. (2016). Global migration governance: Avoiding commitments on human rights, yet tracing a course for cooperation. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 34(2), 113-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/016934411603400203
  9. Degila, D. E., & Valle, V. M. (2022). Multilevel governance of migration for sustainable development: perspectives from the global souths. In Governing Migration for Development from the Global Souths (pp. 1-28). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004522770_002
  10. Unit, E. I. (2016). Measuring Well-governed Migration. The 2016 Migration Governance Index. European Commission. Directorate-General for Economic. (2006). The joint harmonised EU programme of business and consumer surveys (Vol. 5). European Commission, https://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/db_indicators/surveys/documents/bcs_user_guide_en.pdf
  11. Gamlen, A. J., & Marsh, K. (2011). Introduction: Modes of governing global migration. Edward Elgar.
  12. IMF (International Monetary Fund) (1997). The Role of the IMF in Governance Issues: Guidance Note, https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/book/9781557756909/ch01.xml
  13. IMF (International Monetary Fund) (2005). The IMF’s approach to promoting good governance and combating corruption — A guide, https://www.imf.org/external/np/gov/guide/eng/index.htm
  14. IMF (International Monetary Fund) (2018). Review of 1997 guidance note on governance – A proposed framework for enhanced fund engagement, https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Policy-Papers/Issues/2018/04/20
  15. IMF (International Monetary Fund) (2020). IMF and the good governance, https://www.imf.org/en/About/Factsheets/The-IMF-and-Good-Governance
  16. IOM (International Organization for Migration) (2015). Migration Governance Framework, 106th session, C/106 (40), https://governingbodies.iom.int/system/files/en/council/106/C-106-40-Migration-Governance-Framework.pdf
  17. IOM (International Organization for Migration) (2019). World Migration Report 2020, https://publications.iom.int/system /files/pdf/wmr_2020.pdf
  18. IOM (International Organization for Migration) (2021). World Migration Report 2022, McAuliffe, M. and A. Triandafyllidou (eds.), https://publications.iom.int/books/world-migration-report-2022
  19. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Zoido-Lobatón, P. (2002). Governance matters II: Updated indicators for 2000-01 (Vol. 2772). World Bank Publications.
  20. Lateef, K. S. (2016). Evolution of the World Bank’s thinking on governance. Background Paper, Washington. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1290037/evolution-of-the-world-banks-thinking-on-governance/1891785/
  21. Lavenex, S., & Piper, N. (2022). Regions and global migration governance: Perspectives ‘from above’,‘from below’and ‘from beyond’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(12), 2837-2854. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2021.1972564
  22. Marks, G. (1993). Structural Policy and Multilevel Governance in the EC. The State of the European Community, 2.
  23. Marks, G., & Hooghe, L. (2004). Contrasting visions of multi-level governance. Multi-level governance, 15-30.
  24. Robinson, C. (2018). Making migration knowable and governable: Benchmarking practices as technologies of global migration governance. International Political Sociology, 12(4), 418-437. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/oly020
  25. Scipioni, M., & Urso, G. (2017). Migration policy indexes. JRC Science Hub.
  26. Sironi, A., Bauloz, C., & Emmanuel, M. (2019). Glossary on migration. International migration law, 34. https://publications.iom.int/books/international-migration-law-ndeg34-glossary-migration
  27. Tripathi, R. (2017). Good governance: Origin, importance and development in India. International Journal of Development Research, 7(11), 16968-16970.
  28. UN (United Nations) (2007). Good governance practices for the protection of human rights, UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/618018
  29. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (1997). Governance for sustainable human development, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3831662
  30. UNESCAP (n.d.) (United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific), What is Good Governance?, http://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/good-governance.pdf
  31. WB (World Bank) (1991). Managing development: The governance dimension, SECM91-820, https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/884111468134710535/pdf/34899.pdf
  32. WB (World Bank) (1992). Governance and development, The World Bank.
  33. WB (World Bank) (1998). Governance in Asia: From crisis to opportunity, Annual Report.
  34. IOM (International Organization for Migration) (2015). Migration Governance Framework, 106th session, C/106 (40), https://governingbodies.iom.int/system/files/en/council/106/C-106-40-Migration-Governance-Framework.pdf