Journals / Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 3

Violence in Public Healthcare Institutions: A Multilevel Analysis from Patient, Physician and Manager Perspectives

Ali Osman Öztürk(BANDIRMA ONYEDİ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ, SAĞLIK YÖNETİMİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-9708-4284
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Accordingly, improving interpersonal communication, strengthening institutional functioning and addressing structural problems related to health policy are identified as the primary areas for solution.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Violence in healthcare is a multidimensional problem shaped at the intersection of individual, institutional and structural dynamics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:At the micro level, interpersonal communication problems, unmet expectations, inadequate information provision and negative interaction experiences are identified as key factors that increase the potential for violence between service providers and recipients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Accordingly, improving interpersonal communication, strengthening institutional functioning and addressing structural problems related to health policy are identified as the primary areas for solution.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Violence in Healthcare · Health Policy · Multilevel Analysis

Abstract

Violence in healthcare is a multidimensional problem shaped at the intersection of individual, institutional and structural dynamics. In the health management literature, the phenomenon of violence is predominantly examined through single-level analyses, while studies that simultaneously investigate the perspectives of different actors remain limited. Drawing on interviews with thirty patients and their relatives, thirty physicians and ten senior managers, this study examines the causes of violence in healthcare institutions and proposes solutions for Turkish public health system. The study analyses the findings obtained through semi-structured interviews using a multilevel analytical framework across micro, meso and macro levels. At the micro level, interpersonal communication problems, unmet expectations, inadequate information provision and negative interaction experiences are identified as key factors that increase the potential for violence between service providers and recipients. At the meso level, institutional and organisational factors become more visible, with administrative problems, insufficient institutional coordination, infrastructural constraints and delays in healthcare delivery deepening tensions within healthcare institutions. At the macro level, systemic pressures such as high patient volumes, heavy workloads and low health literacy are regarded as structural factors that fuel violence. Accordingly, improving interpersonal communication, strengthening institutional functioning and addressing structural problems related to health policy are identified as the primary areas for solution.

🔖

Cite This Article

Öztürk, A. O., Tetik, E. G., Günay, B. (2026). Violence in Public Healthcare Institutions: A Multilevel Analysis from Patient, Physician and Manager Perspectives. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, Volume: 13 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1978255

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Al-Bitar, A., Ahmad Bishr Nasra, A. B., Alsaoub, L., Dayoub, A., Hmidan, A., Barghouth, R., Kheder, M., Koja, H., Abubakir, M., Massoud, R., Latifeh, Y., & Alsaid, B. (2025). Workplace violence in a conflict zone: A study from Syria’s healthcare frontline. BMC Public Health, 26(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-26102-9
  2. Arnetz, J., Hamblin, L., Spector, M. S., Ager, J., Luborsky, M., Upfal, M. J., Russell, J. & Essenmacher, L. E. (2015). Underreporting of workplace violence: Comparison of self-report and actual documentation of hospital incidents. Workplace Health & Safety, 63(5), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165079915574684
  3. Arnetz, J., Hamblin, L., Sudan, S., & Arnetz, B. (2018). Organizational determinants of workplace violence against hospital workers. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 60(8), 693–699. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001345
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.
  6. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
  7. Dahlberg, L. L., & Krug, E. G. (2002). Violence: A global public health problem. In E. G. Krug, L. L. Dahlberg, J. A. Mercy, A. B. Zwi, & R. Lozano (Eds.), World report on violence and health (pp. 1–56). World Health Organization.
  8. Fernandes, C. M., Raboud, J. M., Christenson, J. M., Bouthillette, F., Bullock, L., Ouellet, L., & Moore, C. (2002). The effect of an education program on violence in the emergency department. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 39(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1067/mem.2002.121202
  9. Gillespie, G. L., Gates, D. M., Miller, M., & Howard, P. K. (2010). Violence against healthcare workers in a pediatric emergency department. Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal, 32(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/TME.0b013e3181c8b0b4
  10. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage.