Journals / Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 13

ROLE OF STAKEHOLDER PARTİCİPATİON FOR PRİNCİPLES OF ACCOUNTABİLİTY AND WİTH IN RELATIONSHIP CORPORATE PERFORMANCE; AN APPLICATION IN HOSPITAL

HESAP VERİLEBİLİRLİK İLKESİ İLE KURUMSAL PERFORMANS İLİŞKİSİNDE PAYDAŞ KATILIMININ ROLÜ; HASTANE İŞLETMELERİNDE BİR UYGULAMA

Pages
12–30
Publication Date
2016-08-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the multiple regression analyses that were applied to test the hypothesis, it was found out that the accountability priciples had a positive impact on good governance elements but had a partial impact on corporate performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the impact of the applicability of accountability principles in public and private hospitals on corporate performance and the intermediate variable role of corporate sustainability and stakeholder participation in this impact were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this survey, the accountability statements were prepared based on the scale of CLSA, the stakeholder participation and corporate performance evaluation statements were prepared based on there liability and validity from the scales has been tested in several studies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the multiple regression analyses that were applied to test the hypothesis, it was found out that the accountability priciples had a positive impact on good governance elements but had a partial impact on corporate performance.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hesap Verilebilirlik · Paydaş Katılımı · Kurumsal Performans

Abstract

In this study, the impact of the applicability of accountability principles in public and private hospitals on corporate performance and the intermediate variable role of corporate sustainability and stakeholder participation in this impact were investigated. Research data were collected by survey medhod. In this survey, the accountability statements were prepared based on the scale of CLSA, the stakeholder participation and corporate performance evaluation statements were prepared based on there liability and validity from the scales has been tested in several studies. The data obtained from 351 managers working in public and private hospitals in Istanbul by using SPSS version 16.0 for Windows were subjected to factor and reliability analyses. As a result of the multiple regression analyses that were applied to test the hypothesis, it was found out that the accountability priciples had a positive impact on good governance elements but had a partial impact on corporate performance. Moreover, it was found out that stakeholder participation had intermediate variable roles in the principles of accountability on corporate performance. Finally, recommendations are given for the managers and the researchers

Özet

Bu çalışmada, hesap verilebilirlik ilkesinin özel ve kamu hastanelerinde uygulanabilirliğinin kurumsal performans üzerine etkisi ve bu etkide paydaş katılımının ara değişken rolü araştırılmıştır. Araştırmanın verileri anket yöntemi kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Anketi oluşturan hesap verilebilirlik ifadeleri CLSA ölçeğinden, paydaş katılımı ve kurumsal performans ifadeleri ise geçerliliği ve güvenilirliği çeşitli çalışmalarda test edilmiş ölçeklerden faydalanılarak hazırlanmıştır. İstanbul ilinde faaliyet gösteren kamu ve özel hastanelerde görevli 351 yöneticiden elde edilen veriler, bilgisayarda SPSS for Windows programının 16.0 sürümü kullanılarak faktör ve güvenilirlik analizlerine tabi tutulmuşlardır. Hipotezleri test etmek üzere yapılan çoklu regresyon analizleri sonucunda, hesap verilebilirlik ilkesinin paydaş katılımınıve pozitif yönde etkilediği, kurumsal performans üzerinde kısmen etkisi olduğu bulgularına ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca hesap verilebilirlik ilkesinin kurumsal performans ilişkisinde paydaş katılımının ara değişken rolünde olduğu sonucu elde edilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇINAR, F. (2016). ROLE OF STAKEHOLDER PARTİCİPATİON FOR PRİNCİPLES OF ACCOUNTABİLİTY AND WİTH IN RELATIONSHIP CORPORATE PERFORMANCE; AN APPLICATION IN HOSPITAL. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 13, 12–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/163967

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Acar, Durmuş. ve Mortaş, Mustafa (2011). İşletmelerin Hesap Verebilirlikleri İle Performans Oranları İlişkisi: İMKB-30 Endeksinde Yer Alan İşletmeler Üzerine Bir Araştırma, Kahramanoğlu Mehmet Bey Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi 13 (21): 85-94, ISSN: 1309-9132.
  2. Akbulut, Yavuz (2010).
  3. Sosyal Bilimlerde SPSS Uygulamaları, İdeal Kültür veYayıncılık İstanbul Hasan Abdioğlu (2007).İşletmelerde Kurumsal Yönetişim Anlayışı Kapsamında İç Denetimin Rölü İMKB-100 Örneği: Doktora. Tezi, MarmaraÜniversitesi,
  4. İşletme Ana Bilim Dalı, İstanbul.
  5. Ahmad, S. ve Schroeder, R.G. (2003). TheImpact of Human Resource Management Practices on OperationalPerformance: Recognizing Country andIndustryDifferences, Journal of Operations Management, 21: 19–43.
  6. Atkinson, H. ve Brown, J. B. (2001). RethinkingPerformanceMeasures: AssessingProgress in UK Hotels, International Journal of ContemporaryHospitality Management, 13(3):128- 135. AmarGill (2001).Saint andSinners: Who’sGotReligion,CLSA (CreditLyonnaisSecuritiesAsia),,CG Watch,CorporateGovernance in Emerging Markets,s.202-205).
  7. Amaratunga, DilanthiandBaldry, David (2002).MovingFromPerformanceMeasurementtoPerformance Management, Facilities. Vol-20,Num 5/6 s.217-223.
  8. Bae, J. ve Lawler, J. J. (Jun 2000). Organizationaland HRM Strategies in Korea: Impact on FirmPperformance in an EmergingEconomy, Academy of Management Journal, 43 (3): 502-517.
  9. Beyan, Oya Deniz (2010).A New Ontologyand Knowledge Base SystemforPerformanceMeasurementInHealthCare,DoctoralThesis, TheDepartment of HealthInformatics, Middle East Technical University,Ankara.
  10. Black, S.Bernard; Jang, Hasungand Kim, Woochan (2003).DoesCorporateGovernanceEffectFirm Value: EvidenceFromKorea, AmericaEconomicAssociationAnnua Meeting, p.1-60.
  11. Black, S,Bernard; Love, InessaandRachinsky, Andrei (2006). CorporateGovernanceIndicesandFirms Market Values: Times Series EvidencefromRussia, EmergingMarketsReview (7): 2006: 361-379.
  12. Bovens, Mark. (2003). Publicaccountability. InHandbook of publicadministaration(B. G. Peters& J. Pierre, eds. pp. 182–208). London: SAGE Bredrup, Harald. (2005).
  13. Background ForPerformance Management, Performance Management, Chopman&Hall, London,s:110. Çelik, Elif (2007).Kurumsal Yönetim Modeli Olarak Paydaş Yaklaşımı: Kamu Ve Özel Hastane Karsılaştırması, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, s:31-142.
  14. Çetin Ayse Tansel and OzerGokhan (2008).“Türkiye’deki Hastanelerde Teknoloji Yatırımları ve Sürekli İyileştirmenin