SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 15 Issue: 1

Development of A New Tool to Analyze Injury Risk: Turkish Get Up Injury Risk Tool

Ahmet Bayrak(SELCUK UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF PHYSIOTHERAPY AND REHABILITATION)0000-0001-7854-6407
Necmiye Ün Yıldırım(UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, GÜLHANE FACULTY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF PHYSIOTHERAPY AND REHABILITATION, PHYSIOTHERAPY AND REHABILITATION PR. (ANKARA))0000-0002-5527-4290
Mustafa Ertuğrul Yaşa(UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, GÜLHANE FACULTY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF PHYSIOTHERAPY AND REHABILITATION, PHYSIOTHERAPY AND REHABILITATION PR. (ANKARA))0000-0002-7796-2588
Özge Çoban(UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, GÜLHANE FACULTY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF PHYSIOTHERAPY AND REHABILITATION, PHYSIOTHERAPY AND REHABILITATION PR. (ANKARA))0000-0002-0979-7613
Pages
—
Publication Date
2024-04-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The injury risk cut-off value was found to be %72 for the overall TUGIR score.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Injury risk analysis is critical to preventing injuries' physical and psychological impact.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Reliability was assessed by internal consistency determined with Cronbach's alpha coefficients and inter-rater reliability determined with Kendall's coefficient of concordance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The injury risk cut-off value was found to be %72 for the overall TUGIR score.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biomechanics · Sports injury · Turkish Get Up exercise

Abstract

Injury risk analysis is critical to preventing injuries' physical and psychological impact. The purpose of this study was to develop a new tool to evaluate the risk of injury particular to the Turkish get up (TGU) exercise. According to expert opinions, the Turkish Get Up Injury Risk Tool (TUGIR) is a biomechanical assessment tool developed based on the Turkish Get Up (TGU) movement. It evaluates the alignment and quality of movement during the exercise to assess the risk of injury. The upper and lower quarter Y balance tests (YBTs) and Functional Movement Screening (FMS) were performed to determine construct validity. A total of thirty- three wrestlers performed all the tests. Reliability was assessed by internal consistency determined with Cronbach's alpha coefficients and inter-rater reliability determined with Kendall's coefficient of concordance. The injury risk cut-off value was calculated according to the Angoff method. The internal consistency of the TUGIR was found to be 0.77 and 0.76, respectively, quite reliable for the right and left sides. Kendall's concordance coefficient of the total score was determined to be 0.998 for both sides. The injury risk cut-off value was found to be %72 for the overall TUGIR score. A low to moderate association was observed between TUGIR and YBTs—FMS. The TUGIR is a novel, reliable, and valid tool for assessing injury risk in sports. This tool offers several advantages, including being an easy-to-use, low- cost, and comprehensive method that can reflect sports-specific biomechanical characteristics. This research could lead to the use of this tool to assess the risk of injury in other sports branches.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bayrak, A., Yıldırım, N. Ü., Yaşa, M. E., Çoban, Ö. (2024). Development of A New Tool to Analyze Injury Risk: Turkish Get Up Injury Risk Tool. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, Volume: 15 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.54141/psbd.1337290

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. Bishop, C., Read, P., Walker, S., & Turner, A. N. (2015). Assessing movement using a variety of screening tests. Professional Strength & Conditioning, (37), 17-26. https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/17260/1/screening_article.pdf
  2. Bonazza, N. A., Smuin, D., Onks, C. A., Silvis, M. L., & Dhawan, A. (2017). Reliability, validity, and injury predictive value of the functional movement screen: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 45(3), 725-732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516641937
  3. Brewer, B. W., & Redmond, C. (Eds.). (2016). Psychology of Sport İnjury. Human Kinetics. https://us.humankinetics.com/products/psychology-of-sport-injury
  4. Bussey, M. (2002). Sports Biomechanics: Reducing İnjury and İmproving Performance. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/
  5. Butowicz, C. M., Pontillo, M., Ebaugh, D., & Silfies, S. P. (2019). Comprehensive movement system screening tool (MSST) for athletes: Development and measurement properties. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 24(6), 512-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2019.10.002
  6. Chalmers, S., Fuller, J. T., Debenedictis, T. A., Townsley, S., Lynagh, M., Gleeson, K., Zacharia, A., Thomson, S., & Magarey, M. (2017). Asymmetry during preseason Functional Movement Screen testing is associated with injury during a junior Australian football season. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 20(7), 653-657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2016.12.076
  7. Collum, C., Weeks, M. Schnetzer, A. Lat, A. Snarr, R. L. (2022). Turkish Get-Up: Correcting Common Kinematic Errors and Translating Movements to More Complex Lifts. Strength and Conditioning Journal 44(1), 119-127, DOI:10.1519/SSC.0000000000000610
  8. Cook, G., Burton, L., & Hoogenboom, B. (2006a). Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function-part 1. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy: NAJSPT, 1(2), 62-72. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2953313/
  9. Cook, G., Burton, L., & Hoogenboom, B. (2006b). Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function-part 2. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy: NAJSPT, 1(3), 132-139. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2953359/
  10. dos Santos Bunn, P., Rodrigues, A. I., & da Silva, E. B. (2019). The association between the functional movement screen outcome and the incidence of musculoskeletal injuries: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Physical Therapy in Sport, 35, 146-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2018.11.011
  11. Ercan, İ., & Kan, İ. (2004). Reliability and validity in the scales. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(3), 211-216. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/uutfd/issue/35255/391149
  12. Frohm, A., Heijne, A., Kowalski, J., Svensson, P., & Myklebust, G. (2012). A nine‐test screening battery for athletes: a reliability study. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 22(3), 306- 315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01267.x
  13. Hoover, D. L., Killian, C. B., Tinius, R. A., Bellar, D. M., Wilkinson, S. G., Esslinger, F. T., & Judge, L. W. (2020). Predictive validity of a functional movement screen in professional basketball players. Medicina, 56(12), 724.
  14. Jang, T.-R., Chang, C.-F., Chen, S.-C., Fu, Y.-C., & Lu, T.-W. (2009). Biomechanics and potential injury mechanisms of wrestling. Biomedical Engineering: Applications, Basis and Communications, 21(03), 215-222. https://doi.org/10.4015/S1016237209001271
  15. Kiesel, K. B., Butler, R. J., & Plisky, P. J. (2014). Prediction of injury by limited and asymmetrical fundamental movement patterns in American football players. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 23(2), 88-94. https://doi.org/10.1123/JSR.2012-0130
  16. Kraan, R. B., de Nobel, D., Eygendaal, D., Daams, J. G., Kuijer, P. P. F., & Maas, M. (2019). Incidence, prevalence, and risk factors for elbow and shoulder overuse injuries in youth athletes: A systematic review. Translational Sports Medicine, 2(4), 186-195. https://doi.org/10.1002/tsm2.82
  17. Leatherwood, M. D., Whittaker, A., & Esco, M. R. (2014). Exercise technique: The Turkish get-up with a kettlebell. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 36(6), 107-110. https://journals.lww.com/nsca-scj/pages/default.aspx
  18. Liebenson, C., & Shaughness, G. (2011). The Turkish get-up. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 15(1), 125-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.10.004
  19. Loudon J.K., Parkerson-Mitchell A.J., Hildebrand L.D., & Teague C. (2014). Functional Movement Screen Scores In A Group Of Running Athletes. J Strength Cond Res, 28(4), 909-913.
  20. McGuigan M. (2016) Administration, Scoring and Interpretation of Selected Test In: Haff GG, Triplett NT (eds), Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning, 4th Edit. USA, Human Kinetics, 259-317.
  21. Mills, C. N., & Melican, G. J. (1988). Estimating and adjusting cutoff scores: Features of selected methods. Applied Measurement in Education, 1(3), 261-275. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0103_7
  22. Moore, E., Fuller, J. T., Milanese, S., Jones, S. C., Townsley, A., Lynagh, M., & Chalmers, S. (2023). Does changing the Functional Movement Screen composite score threshold influence injury risk estimation in junior Australian football players? Journal of sports sciences, 41(1), 20-26, DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2023.2193782
  23. Moran, R. W., Schneiders, A. G., Major, K. M., & Sullivan, S. J. (2016). How reliable are Functional Movement Screening scores? A systematic review of rater reliability. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50(9), 527-536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-094913
  24. Mukaka, M. M. (2012). A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Medical Journal, 24(3), 69-71. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3576830/
  25. Niederberger, M., & Spranger, J. (2020). Delphi technique in health sciences: a map. Frontiers in Public Health, 457. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00457
  26. Padua, D. A., Marshall, S. W., Boling, M. C., Thigpen, C. A., Garrett Jr, W. E., & Beutler, A. I. (2009). The Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) is a valid and reliable clinical assessment tool of jump- landing biomechanics: the JUMP-ACL study. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 37(10), 1996-2002. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509343200
  27. Peterson, L., & Renstrom, P. A. (Eds.). (2016). Sports İnjuries: Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation: CRC Press. https://www.routledge.com/go/crc-press
  28. Shaffer, S. W., Teyhen, D. S., Lorenson, C. L., Warren, R. L., Koreerat, C. M., Straseske, C. A., & Childs, J. D. (2013). Y-balance test: a reliability study involving multiple raters. Military Medicine, 178(11), 1264-1270. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00222
  29. Silva, B., Clemente, F. M., & Martins, F. M. (2017). Associations between functional movement screen scores and performance variables in surf athletes. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical fitness, 58(5), 583-590. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28229573/
  30. Smith, C. A., Chimera, N. J., Wright, N. J., & Warren, M. (2013). Interrater and intrarater reliability of the functional movement screen. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 27(4), 982- 987. https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/Fulltext/2013/04000/Interrater_and_Intrarater_Reliability_of_the.15.aspx
  31. St-Onge, E., Robb, A., Beach, T. A., & Howarth, S. J. (2019). A descriptive analysis of shoulder muscle activities during individual stages of the Turkish Get-Up exercise. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 23(1), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.01.013
  32. Takahashi S, Nagano Y, Wataru I, Kido Y, Okuwaki T. (2019). A retrospective study of mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in high school basketball, handball, judo, soccer, and volleyball, Medicine (Baltimore), 98(26), 1-6, DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016030
  33. Teyhen, D. S., Shaffer, S. W., Lorenson, C. L., Halfpap, J. P., Donofry, D. F., Walker, M. J., Dugan, J. L., & Childs, J. D. (2012). The functional movement screen: a reliability study. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 42(6), 530-540. https://www.jospt.org/doi/10.2519/jospt.2012.3838
  34. Vaske, J. J., Beaman, J., & Sponarski, C. C. (2017). Rethinking internal consistency in Cronbach's alpha. Leisure Sciences, 39(2), 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2015.1127189
  35. Vehrs, P. R., Uvacsek, M., & Johnson, A. W. (2021). Assessment of Dysfunctional Movements and Asymmetries in Children and Adolescents Using the Functional Movement Screen—A Narrative Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(23), 12501.
  36. Westrick, R. B., Miller, J. M., Carow, S. D., & Gerber, J. P. (2012). Exploration of the y-balance test for assessment of upper quarter closed kinetic chain performance. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 7(2), 139. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3325634/