SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 17 Issue: 2

An Analysis of Sports Policies Leading to Elite Sport Competitiveness: A Case Study of Iran as a Developing Country

Hasan Gholami Ghajari(University of Guilan)0009-0001-3963-0363
Hamidreza Goharrostami(University of guilan)0000-0002-6518-466X
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-08-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The model shows that sufficient financing and broader participation enable coaching development, professional support, and adequate training facilities, which strengthen talent identification and competition experience, ultimately leading to elite-sport competitiveness in Iran.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The international competition for success in the Olympic Games and World Championships often causes some countries to fall short of winning medals, highlighting the importance of competitiveness in elite sports.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the first phase, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 experts, including sports management professors, administrators, coaches, athletes, and media professionals, until theoretical saturation was reached, identifying policies related to elite sport competitiveness.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The model shows that sufficient financing and broader participation enable coaching development, professional support, and adequate training facilities, which strengthen talent identification and competition experience, ultimately leading to elite-sport competitiveness in Iran.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Competitive Advantage · High Performance · Institutional Legitimacy

Abstract

The international competition for success in the Olympic Games and World Championships often causes some countries to fall short of winning medals, highlighting the importance of competitiveness in elite sports. Accordingly, this study aimed to analyze sports policies that affect elite sports competitiveness in the Islamic Republic of Iran. The study had two phases. In the first phase, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 experts, including sports management professors, administrators, coaches, athletes, and media professionals, until theoretical saturation was reached, identifying policies related to elite sport competitiveness. In the second phase, 12 sports management professors completed a pairwise comparison questionnaire based on the identified policies. Data were analyzed using the Total Interpretive Structural Modelling method to establish the hierarchical influence structure of these policies. Five elite Iranian sports were studied: wrestling, weightlifting, taekwondo, kabaddi, and futsal. Eight policies were identified and positioned as follows: level 6-financing methods; level 5-participation rate; level 4-coaching development, professional athlete support, and training facility adequacy; level 3-talent identification; level 2-competition experience; and level 1-elite sport competitiveness. Additionally, MICMAC analysis placed financing methods and participation rate in the "driver" quadrant; coaching development, athlete support, and training facilities in the "linkage" quadrant; and talent identification, competition experience, and elite sport competitiveness in the "dependent" quadrant of the driving power-dependence matrix. The model shows that sufficient financing and broader participation enable coaching development, professional support, and adequate training facilities, which strengthen talent identification and competition experience, ultimately leading to elite-sport competitiveness in Iran.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ghajari, H. G., Goharrostami, H. (2026). An Analysis of Sports Policies Leading to Elite Sport Competitiveness: A Case Study of Iran as a Developing Country. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, Volume: 17 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.54141/psbd.1838182

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (29)

  1. Birhanu, Z. (2024). Ethiopia and Kenya at the Summer Olympic Games: Comparison of Performances. Ethiopian Journal of Sport Science, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10810896
  2. Brannagan, P. M., Giulianotti, R., & Grix, J. (2025). Sport and Power: hard power, soft power and smart power. Leisure Studies, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2025.2472728
  3. Chelladurai, P. (2014). Managing organizations for sport and physical activity: A systems perspective. Routledge.
  4. Csurilla, G., & Fertő, I. (2022). How long does a medal win last? Survival analysis of the duration of Olympic success. Applied Economics, 54(43), 5006–5020. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2022.2039370
  5. De Bosscher, V. (2008). The global sporting arms race: An international comparative study on sports policy factors leading to international sporting success. Meyer & Meyer Verlag.
  6. De Bosscher, V., De Knop, P., Van Bottenburg, M., & Shibli, S. (2006). A conceptual framework for analysing sports policy factors leading to international sporting success. European Sport Management Quarterly, 6(2), 185–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184740600955087
  7. De Bosscher, V., De Knop, P., Van Bottenburg, M., Shibli, S., & Bingham, J. (2009). Explaining international sporting success: An international comparison of elite sport systems and policies in six countries. Sport Management Review, 12(3), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2009.01.001
  8. De Bosscher, V., Shibil, S., Westerbeek, H., & Van Bottenburg, M. (2015). Successful elite sport policies: An international comparison of the Sportspolicy Factors Leading to International Sporting Success (SPLISS 2.0) in 15 nations. Meyer & Meyer Verlag.
  9. De Bosscher, V., Shibli, S., Van Bottenburg, M., De Knop, P., & Truyens, J. (2010). Developing a method for comparing the elite sport systems and policies of nations: A mixed research methods approach. Journal of Sport Management, 24(5), 567–600. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.24.5.567
  10. De Rycke, J., & De Bosscher, V. (2019). Mapping the potential societal impacts triggered by elite sport: a conceptual framework. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 11(3), 485–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2019.1581649
  11. Dhir, S., & Dhir, S. (2020). Modeling of strategic thinking enablers: a modified total interpretive structural modeling (TISM) and MICMAC approach. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 11(1), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-019-00937-z
  12. Eydi, H., Ramzaninejad, R., & Dastoom, S. (2018). compared of the Performance Iran in the Summer Olympics to countries in Asia, Africa and Central and South America. Sport Management and Development, 7(2), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.22124/JSMD.2018.3218 [In Persian]
  13. Gómez-Rodríguez, J., Seguí-Urbaneja, J., Teixeira, M. C., & Cabello-Manrique, D. (2024). How Countries Compete for Success in Elite Sport: A Systematic Review. Social Sciences, 13(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13010031
  14. Günbayi, I., & Sorm, S. (2018). Social paradigms in guiding social research design: The functional, interpretive, radical humanist and radical structural paradigms. Online Submission, 9(2), 57–76. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED585253
  15. Henry, I., Dowling, M., Ko, L. M., & Brown, P. (2020). Challenging the new orthodoxy: a critique of SPLISS and variable-oriented approaches to comparing sporting nations. European Sport Management Quarterly, 20(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2020.1719428
  16. Jacobs, S., De Bosscher, V., Venter, R., Patatas, J. M., & Scheerder, J. (2021). Contextual factors influencing the South African elite sporting system: An ‘open system’approach. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 13(4), 699–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2021.1951327
  17. Klöcker, J. A., & Daumann, F. (2025). Evaluation of Global South’s efficiency at the Summer Olympics. PloS One, 20(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315054
  18. Ramos, R., De Bosscher, V., Pankowiak, A., & Valleser, C. W. (2023). Contexts shaping the development and success of elite sport systems: a scoping review. Sport Management Review, 26(5), 649–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2023.2171276
  19. Satheesh, S., Pradhan, V., Shukla, K., & Patil, Y. (2026). A total interpretive structural modelling (TISM) framework for gamification in solid waste management and its influence on quality of life (QoL). Discover Sustainability, 7(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-02756-2
  20. Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage publications.
  21. Seguí-Urbaneja, J., Cabello-Manrique, D., Guevara-Pérez, J. C., & Puga-González, E. (2022). Understanding the Predictors of Economic Politics on Elite Sport: A Case Study from Spain. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912401
  22. Smolianov, P., Gallo, J., & Naylor, A. H. (2014). Comparing the practices of USA tennis against a global model for integrated development of mass participation and high performance sport. Managing Leisure, 19(4), 283–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/13606719.2014.885717
  23. Sotiriadou, P., & De Bosscher, V. (2018). Managing high-performance sport: Introduction to past, present and future considerations. European Sport Management Quarterly, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2017.1400225
  24. Stonehouse, G., & Snowdon, B. (2007). Competitive advantage revisited: Michael Porter on strategy and competitiveness. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16(3), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492607306333
  25. Storm, R. K., & Nielsen, K. (2023). Greenland’s Elite Sport System: Capabilities, Challenges and Performance of a (Very) Small Nation in the World’s Largest Island. Journal of Global Sport Management, 8(4), 838–863. https://doi.org/10.1080/24704067.2021.1928531
  26. Sushil. (2012). Interpreting the Interpretive Structural Model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(2), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-012-0008-3
  27. Truyens, J., De Bosscher, V., Heyndels, B., & Westerbeek, H. (2014). A resource-based perspective on countries’ competitive advantage in elite athletics. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 6(3), 459–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2013.839954
  28. Vukadinović, S., Simović, S., & Jovanović, J. (2021). Competitiveness of the sport system in the Republic of Srpska. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 21(1), 416–424. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2021.01041
  29. Wu, D.-Y., Tan, T.-C., & Wang, Y.-T. (2025). A new shortcut for competitive sports development? The purpose of and strategy for developing and introducing sepaktakraw in Taiwan. PloS One, 20(1), 1-19. https://doi.10.1371/journal.pone.0317451