SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 15 Issue: 1

A Qualitative Study on E-Sports Players’ Leadership Perceptions Regarding Their Team Coaches

Orçun Keçeci(ANADOLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-1909-409X
Veli Onur Çelik(ESKİŞEHİR TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SPOR BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-7865-6531
Pages
—
Publication Date
2024-04-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Accordingly, it was found that leadership in e-sports is perceived under five themes: physical characteristics, personality traits, professional qualifications, technical skills, and management skills.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Having emerged following the professionalization of digital gaming, e-sports has created its ecosystem and become a large-scale industry itself.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Teams involved in this industry experience a social environment just like in other organizational structures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Accordingly, it was found that leadership in e-sports is perceived under five themes: physical characteristics, personality traits, professional qualifications, technical skills, and management skills.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Digital game · E-sports · Leadership

Abstract

Having emerged following the professionalization of digital gaming, e-sports has created its ecosystem and become a large-scale industry itself. Teams involved in this industry experience a social environment just like in other organizational structures. As e-sports is a relatively newer branch when compared to other sports branches, leadership in e-sports is not a commonly studied topic in the literature. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore leadership perceptions of e-sports players in a comprehensive way. A team coach is often considered the leader in e-sports. The study was designed according to the principles of phenomenology, which is a qualitative research method. The semi-structured interview form developed by the researchers was used as the data collection instrument. The interviews were conducted with a group of e-sports players who met the predetermined criteria for participation in the study. The data was analyzed by using the content analysis method. First, the codes were determined, and later, the categories, and finally, the themes were identified out of these categories. Accordingly, it was found that leadership in e-sports is perceived under five themes: physical characteristics, personality traits, professional qualifications, technical skills, and management skills. Finally, it can be concluded that leadership in e-sports is quite similar to leadership in other traditional sports in many ways. However, the study showed that it has unique characteristics that need studying within the framework of the digital age and technological advancements.

🔖

Cite This Article

Keçeci, O., Çelik, V. O. (2024). A Qualitative Study on E-Sports Players’ Leadership Perceptions Regarding Their Team Coaches. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, Volume: 15 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.54141/psbd.1380150

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (52)

  1. Adams, K. L., Devia-Allen, G., & Moore, M. A. (2019). What is esports? In Rogers, R. (Eds.) Understanding esports (An Introduction to The Global Phenomenon) (pp. 3-14). London: Lexington Books.
  2. Argan, M., & Akın, E. (2007). Elektronik spor: Özellikleri, kavram ve uygulamalarına yönelik kuramsal çerçeve. 4th International Mediterranean Sport Sciences Congress, (pp. 80). Antalya.
  3. Boardley, I. D., Kavussanu, M., & Ring, C. (2008). Athletes' perceptions of coaching effectiveness and athlete-related outcomes in rugby union: An investigation based on the coaching efficacy model. The Sport Psychologist, 22, 269-287.
  4. Bolden, R. (2004). What is leadership? South West Regional Development Agency.
  5. Breslau, R. (2012). Gamespot. 25.1.2024 cited by: https://www.gamespot.com/articles/riot-vp-of-esports-haters-gonna-hate/1100-6397683/
  6. Chelladurai, P. (1984). Discrepancy between preference and perception of leadership behaviour and satisfaction of athletes in varying sports. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6, 24-41.
  7. Chelladurai, P. (1990). Leadership in sports: A review. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 21(4), 328-354.
  8. Chelladurai, P., & Saleh, S. (1980). Dimensions of leader behavior in sports: Development of a leadership scale. Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 34-45.
  9. Cote, J., Bruner, M., Erickson, K., Strachan, L., & Fraser-Thomas, J. (2010). Athlete development and coaching. In Lyle, J. & Cushion, C. (Eds.), Sports coaching (pp. 63-83). Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.
  10. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
  11. Çetin, E., & Çelik, V. O. (2022). Z kuşağı sporcularının antrenörlerine ilişkin liderlik beklentilerine genel bir bakış: Kuramsal çerçeve. International Journal of Education and New Approaches, 5(2), 348-359. doi: 10.52974/jena.1221608
  12. Drath, W. H., & Palus, C. J. (1994). Making common sense: Leadership as meaning-making in a community of practice. North Carolina: Center for Creative Leadership.
  13. Falkhental, E., & Byrne, A. M. (2020). Distributed leadership in collegiate esports. Simulation and Gaming, Oct., 1-19. doi: 10.1177/1046878120958750
  14. Gardner, D. E., Shields, D. L., Bredemeier, B. J., & Bostrom, A. (1996). The relationship between perceived coaching behaviors and team cohesion among baseball and softball players. The Sport Psychologist, 10(4), 367-381.
  15. Gitmez, A. S. (2020). Sosyal bilim araştırmalarında yöntembilim. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
  16. Guba, E. G., Lincoln, Y. S., & Lynham, S. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 163-188). Sage Publications.
  17. Güney, S. (2015). Liderlik. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
  18. Gürüz, D., & Gürel, E. (2009). Yönetim ve organizasyon (Bireyden örgüte, fikirden eyleme). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
  19. Hedlund, J., Forsythe, G. B., Horvath, J. A., Williams, W. M., Snook, S., & Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Identifying and assessing tacit knowledge: Understanding the practical intelligence of military leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 117-120. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00006-7
  20. Hemphill, J. K., & Coons, A. E. (1957). Development of the leader behavior description questionnaire. In Stogdill, R. M. & Coons, A. E. (Eds.) Leader behavior: Its description and measurement (pp. 6-38). Colombus: Bureau of Business Research.
  21. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A., Dorfman, P. W., Javidan, M., & Dickson, M. (1999). Cultural ınfluences of leadership and organizations: Project globe. In Mobley, W. H., Gessner, M. J. & Arnold, V. (Eds.) Advances in global leadership (pp. 131-233). Connecticut: JAI Press.
  22. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. H. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687
  23. https-1. (2024). World Medical Association. 1.25.2024 cited by: wma.net: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/
  24. Jacobs, T. O., & Jaques, E. (1990). Military executive leadership. In Clark, K. E. & Clark, M. B. (Eds.) Measures of leadership (pp. 281-295). New Jersey: Leadership Library of America.
  25. Kabadayı, O. K. (2020). A'dan Z'ye e-spor (Bir Profesyonelden).
  26. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: John Wiley.
  27. Keach, S. (2015). Trusted Reviews. 25.1.2024 cited by: https://www.trustedreviews.com/opinion/what-are-esports-a-beginner-s-guide-to-pro-gaming-2932403
  28. Keçeci, O., & Çelik, V. O. (2021). Leadership in e-sport organizations: A theoretical framework. Spormetre The Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 19(2), 1-13. doi: 10.33689/spormetre.830800
  29. Kilci, A. K. (2019). Spor ve dijital oyunda son nokta: Espor. Gazi Kitabevi.
  30. Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Authentic leadership development. In Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E. & Quinn, R. E. (Eds.) Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 241-258). Berrett-Koehler.
  31. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications.
  32. Mustafaoğlu, R. (2018). E-Sport, sport and physical activity. Journal of National Sport Sciences, 2(2), 84-96. doi: 10.30769/usbd.457545
  33. Northouse, P. G. (2010). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage Publications.
  34. Nuangjumnong, T. (2016). Development of leadership through esports. (Unpublished doctoral thesis) Waseda University, Graduate School of Asia-Pacific Studies, Tokyo.
  35. O'Boyle, I., Murray, D., & Cummins, P. (2015). Leadership in sport. Routledge.
  36. Ponterotto, J. G. (2005). Qualitative research in counseling psychology: A primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 126-136. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.126
  37. Rauch, C. F., & Behling, O. (1984). Functionalism: Basis for an alternate approach to the study of leadership. In Hunt, J. G., Hosking, D. M., Schriesheim, C. A. & Stewart, R. (Eds.) Leaders and managers: ınternational perspectives on managerial behavior and leadership (pp. 45-62). Pergamon Press.
  38. Richards, D., & Engle, S. (1986). After the vision: Suggestions to corporate visionaries and vision champions. In Adams, J. D. (Eds.) Transforming Leadership (pp. 199-214). Miles River Press.
  39. Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass.
  40. Seo, Y. (2013). Electronic sports: A new marketing landscape of the experience economy. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(13-14), 1542-1560. doi: 10.1080/0267257X.2013.822906
  41. Smith, M. J., Arthur, C. A., Hardy, J., Callow, N., & Williams, D. (2013). Transormational leadership and task cohesion in sport: The mediating role of ıntrateam communication. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9, 249-257. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.10.002
  42. Smoll, F. L., & Smith, R. E. (1989). Leadership behaviours in sport: A theoretical model and research paradigm. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 19, 1522-1551.
  43. Smoll, F. L., Smith, R. E., Barnett, J. J., & Everett, J. J. (1993). Enhancement of children's self-esteem through social support training for youth sport coaches. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 602-610.
  44. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grouned theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications.
  45. Wagner, M. G. (2006). On the scientific relevance of esports. Internet Computing and Computer Games Development, (pp. 437-442).
  46. Williams, J. M., & Widmeyer, N. W. (1991). The cohesion-performance outcome relationship in coaching sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 13(4), 364-371.
  47. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayınları.
  48. Drath, W. H., & Palus, C. J. (1994). Making common sense: Leadership as meaning-making in a community of practice. North Carolina: Center for Creative Leadership.
  49. Richards, D., & Engle, S. (1986). After the vision: Suggestions to corporate visionaries and vision champions. In Adams, J. D. (Eds.) Transforming Leadership (pp. 199-214). Miles River Press.
  50. Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass.
  51. Smoll, F. L., Smith, R. E., Barnett, J. J., & Everett, J. J. (1993). Enhancement of children's self-esteem through social support training for youth sport coaches. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 602-610.
  52. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grouned theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications.