SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya Üniversitesi Türk Akademi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

The Effect of Uncertainty on International Direct Investment: Structural Break ARDL and Causality Approach in Türkiye's Direct Investment in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Uluslararası Doğrudan Sermaye Yatırımları Üzerinde Belirsizliğin Etkisi: Türkiye’nin Bosna-Hersek’e Yönelik Doğrudan Yatırımlarında Yapısal Kırılmalı ARDL ve Nedensellik Yaklaşımı

Cemal Erdem Hepaktan(MANISA CELAL BAYAR UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES)0000-0002-3522-1941
Suna Çevik(MANISA CELAL BAYAR UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES)0000-0003-4073-6680
Pages
11–26
Publication Date
2026-03-04
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Unit root test results demonstrate that all variables are integrated of order one, thereby confirming the applicability of the ARDL bounds testing approach.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigates how global uncertainty and global sentiment indicators are associated with foreign direct investment (FDI) flows from Türkiye to Bosnia and Herzegovina.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Quarterly data spanning the period 2006Q2–2024Q3 are employed, and the empirical analysis is conducted using a structural break–augmented ARDL framework.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Unit root test results demonstrate that all variables are integrated of order one, thereby confirming the applicability of the ARDL bounds testing approach.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar · Belirsizlik Endeksi · ARDL

Abstract

This study investigates how global uncertainty and global sentiment indicators are associated with foreign direct investment (FDI) flows from Türkiye to Bosnia and Herzegovina. Quarterly data spanning the period 2006Q2–2024Q3 are employed, and the empirical analysis is conducted using a structural break–augmented ARDL framework. The dependent variable is specified as the year-on-year percentage change in FDI inflows originating from Türkiye, whereas the explanatory variables are constructed from the IMF’s global uncertainty and global sentiment indices. Unit root test results demonstrate that all variables are integrated of order one, thereby confirming the applicability of the ARDL bounds testing approach. The findings indicate that global uncertainty and global sentiment generate limited and transitory effects on FDI flows in the short run. Although the presence of a long-run cointegration relationship is confirmed, the corresponding long-run coefficients fail to attain statistical significance. Overall, the results point to the view that global psychological indicators play a relatively weak role in shaping Türkiye’s outward FDI toward Bosnia and Herzegovina, with investment decisions appearing to be driven predominantly by structural and bilateral economic factors.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’den Bosna-Hersek’e yönelen doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımlarının (DYY), Bosna-Hersek’e ilişkin küresel belirsizlik ve küresel duyarlılık göstergeleriyle olan ilişkisini incelemektedir. Analizlerde 2006Q2–2024Q3 dönemini kapsayan çeyreklik veriler kullanılmış ve yapısal kırılmalı ARDL yaklaşımı uygulanmıştır. Bağımlı değişken, Türkiye kaynaklı DYY akışlarının yıllık yüzde değişimi olarak tanımlanırken; bağımsız değişkenler IMF tarafından yayımlanan küresel belirsizlik ve küresel duyarlılık endekslerinden elde edilmiştir. Birim kök testleri, tüm değişkenlerin birinci farklarında durağan olduğunu ortaya koymuş ve ARDL sınır testi çerçevesinin uygulanabilirliğini doğrulamıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, kısa dönemde küresel belirsizlik ve duyarlılık göstergelerinin DYY üzerinde sınırlı ve geçici etkiler yarattığını, uzun dönemde ise değişkenler arasında eşbütünleşme ilişkisi bulunmasına karşın katsayıların istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmadığını göstermektedir. Bu sonuçlar, Türkiye–Bosna-Hersek DYY ilişkilerinde küresel psikolojik göstergelerin belirleyici etkisinin zayıf kaldığını ve yatırım kararlarının daha çok yapısal ve ikili ekonomik unsurlar tarafından şekillendiğini ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Hepaktan, C. E., Çevik, S. (2026). The Effect of Uncertainty on International Direct Investment: Structural Break ARDL and Causality Approach in Türkiye's Direct Investment in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Sakarya Üniversitesi Türk Akademi Dergisi, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 11–26. https://doi.org/10.62122/sautad.1823329

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (46)

  1. Ahir, H., Bloom, N. ve Furceri, D. (2018). World uncertainty index (IMF Working Paper No. 19/273). https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2020/03/pdf/imf-launches-world-uncertainty-index-wui-furceri.pdf
  2. Ahir, H., Bloom, N. ve Furceri, D. (2022). The world uncertainty index (NBER Working Paper No. 29763). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  3. Ahir, H., Bloom, N. ve Furceri, D. (2025, Eylül). Uncertainty about uncertainty. Finance & Development. International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/en/publications/fandd/issues/2025/09/uncertainty-about-uncertainty-nicholas-bloom
  4. Altig, D., Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N., Davis, S. J., Meyer, B. H. ve Parker, N. (2020). Surveying business uncertainty (NBER Working Paper No. 25956). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w25956
  5. Azam, M., Khan, M. A. ve Iqbal, N. (2012). Impact of political risk and uncertainty on FDI in South Asia. Transition Studies Review, 19, 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11300-012-0230-x
  6. Balaban, S., Živkov, D. ve Milenković, I. (2019). Impact of an unexplained component of real exchange rate volatility on FDI: Evidence from transition countries. Economic Systems, 43, 100719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2019.100719
  7. Batmaz, N. ve Tekeli, S. (2009). Doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımlarının ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkileri: Polonya, Çek Cumhuriyeti, Macaristan ve Türkiye örneği (1996–2006). Ekin Yayınevi.
  8. Bloom, N. (2009). The impact of uncertainty shocks. Econometrica, 77(3), 623-685. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA6248
  9. Bloom, N. (2014). Fluctuations in uncertainty. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.2.153
  10. Centralna Banka Bosne i Hercegovine (CBBH). (2020). Annual report 2020. https://cbbh.ba/content/archive/36
  11. Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina (CBBH). (2024). Annual report 2024. https://ticaret.gov.tr/data/5b8a43355c7495406a2276af/BH%20Merkez%20Bankas%C4%B1%20-%20Annual%20Report%202024.pdf
  12. Çepni, O., Gül, S., Hacıhasanoğlu, Y. S. ve Yılmaz, M. H. (2020). Global uncertainties and portfolio flow dynamics of the BRICS countries. Research in International Business and Finance, 54, 101277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101277
  13. Çetin, M. A. ve Yaman, İ. (2023). The importance of geopolitical risk and institutional quality indicators on foreign direct investment to BRICS countries. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 26(4), 107–127. https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85186539130&origin=resultslist
  14. Emir, M., Uysal, M. ve Doğru, B. (2013). Ülkenin risklilik durumu ile ülkeye gelen doğrudan yabancı yatırım arasındaki ilişki: Türkiye örneği. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 27(2), 79–92.
  15. Erdoğan, B. ve Doğan, M. (2024). Jeopolitik risk ve belirsizlik endeksleri ile BRICS borsaları arasındaki volatilite yayılımları. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 27(1), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.29249/selcuksbmyd.1440319
  16. Foreign Investment Promotion Agency of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FIPA). (2021, Şubat). FDI position and performance.
  17. Foreign Investment Promotion Agency of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FIPA). (2025, Mayıs). FDI position and performance.
  18. Gürgün, G. (2020). “Belirsizlik kavramı, belirsizlik ölçütleri ve belirsizliğin makroekonomik etkileri üzerine bir inceleme.” Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 34(1), 21–38. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/969460
  19. Hossain, S., Voumik, L. C., Ahmed, T. T., Alam, M. B. ve Tasmim, Z. (2024). Impact of geopolitical risk, GDP, inflation, interest rate, and trade openness on foreign direct investment: Evidence from five Southeast Asian countries. Regional Sustainability, 5(4), 1–13. 100177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsus.2024.100177
  20. International Monetary Fund. (2025, 28 Temmuz). Bosnia and Herzegovina: 2025 Article IV consultation – Press release; staff report; staff supplement; and statement by the alternate executive director for Bosnia and Herzegovina (IMF Country Report No. 25/252).
  21. International Monetary Fund. (2025, 1 Temmuz). Bosnia and Herzegovina: Staff concluding statement for the 2025 Article IV consultation mission. https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2025/07/01/cs-070125-bosnia-and-herzegovina-staff-concluding-statement-for-2025-aiv-consultation-mission
  22. International Monetary Fund. (2025, 29 Ağustos). IMF executive board concludes 2025 Article IV consultation with Bosnia and Herzegovina (Press Release No. 25/284). https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2025/08/28/pr-25284-bosnia-and-herzegovina-imf-executive-board-concludes-2025-article-iv-consultation
  23. Law on the Policy of Foreign Direct Investment in Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2016, 5 Ağustos). Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina (No. 17/98, 13/03, 48/10, 22/15).
  24. Lo Duca, M., Hoerova, M. ve Bekaert, G. (2013). Risk, uncertainty and monetary policy (Working Paper Series No. 1565). European Central Bank. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecb/ecbwps/20131565.html
  25. Marić, Ž. (2009). The foreign direct investments entrance and its impact into countries in transition (Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina). Interdisciplinary Management Research V. Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics.
  26. Mirascic, G. (2011). Current economic situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of International and Global Studies, 3(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.62608/2158-0669.1063
  27. Narayan, P. K. (2005). The saving and investment nexus for China: Evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics, 37(17), 1979–1990. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500278103
  28. Nguyen, C. P. ve Lee, G. S. (2021). Uncertainty, financial development, and FDI inflows: Global evidence. Economic Modelling, 99, 105473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.02.014
  29. Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (1998, amended 2003, 2010, 2015). Law on the Policy of Foreign Direct Investment in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Cleansed text) (Nos. 17/98, 13/03, 48/10, 22/15).
  30. Oltulular, S. (2024). Foreign direct investments under uncertainty and risk: A structural vector autoregression (SVAR) analysis. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4727035
  31. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. ve Smith R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2678547
  32. Pesaran, M. H. ve Pesaran, B. (2009). Time series econometrics using microfit 5.0. Oxford University Press.
  33. Sarajčić, S. ve Muslija, A. (2020). The causal linkage between political stability and foreign direct investments in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Časopis za upravu i upravno pravo, 1/2020, 9–24.
  34. Sarialioğlu Hayali, A. (2021). The causal relationship between foreign direct investment and uncertainty: The example of Turkey uncertainty index. The Journal of Academic Social Science. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/ASOS.54123
  35. Shahbaz, M., Khan, S. ve Tahir, M. I. (2013). The dynamic links between energy consumption, economic growth, financial development and trade in China: Fresh evidence from multivariate framework analysis. Energy Economics, 40, 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.06.006
  36. Şit, M. (2022). Belirsizlik ve doğrudan yabancı yatırım ilişkisi: Yeni bir endeks ile panel veri analizi. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(3), 1200–1215. https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.1049930
  37. Tabash, M. I., Farooq, U., Al-Absy, M. S. M., Albzour, O. F. ve Mahmoud, O. A. (2023). How does economic policy uncertainty influence the innovation activities: Empirical evidence from BRICS. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100164
  38. T.C. Saraybosna Büyükelçiliği Ticaret Müşavirliği (2021, Ağustos). Bosna-Hersek ülke raporu 2021. https://ticaret.gov.tr/data/5b8a43355c7495406a2276af/Bosna%20Hersek%20%C3%9Clke%20Raporu%202021.pdf
  39. T.C. Saraybosna Büyükelçiliği Ticaret Müşavirliği. (2024). Bosna-Hersek ülke raporu 2024. https://ticaret.gov.tr/data/5b8a43355c7495406a2276af/Bosna_Hersek_Ulke_Raporu_2024.pdf
  40. T.C. Ticaret Bakanlığı. (2025). Yurt dışı yatırım ülke profili: Bosna-Hersek.
  41. Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası (TCMB). (2013, Aralık). Uluslararası yatırım pozisyonu raporu.
  42. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2015, 27 Mart). UNCTAD presents its investment policy advice to Bosnia and Herzegovina. https://unctad.org/news/unctad-presents-its-investment-policy-advice-bosnia-and-herzegovina
  43. U.S. Department of State. (2024). 2024 Investment climate statements: Bosnia and Herzegovina. https://www.state.gov/reports/2024-investment-climate-statements/bosnia-and-herzegovina
  44. U.S. Department of State. (2025, Eylül). Bosnia and Herzegovina investment climate statement 2025. https://www.state.gov/reports/2025-investment-climate-statements/bosnia-and-herzegovina
  45. Wang, D., Li, K. ve Shen, X. (2025). Fear of war: Geopolitical risks and the potential impact on local government bonds, stock market and FDI in China. Economics Letters, 251, 112329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112329
  46. World Bank. (2025). Western Balkans regular economic report no. 28 | Fall 2025: Towards better jobs. https://www.worldbank.org/eca/wbrer