SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Girişimcilik ve İnovasyon Yönetimi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Trends in Digital Entrepreneurship with Vosviewer and Topic Modeling Approach

Vosviewer ve Konu Modelleme Yaklaşımı ile Dijital Girişimcilikteki Trendlerin Değerlendirilmesi

Osman Akarsu(BİLECİK ŞEYH EDEBALİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0595-6795
Emine Nur Çalli(BİLECİK ŞEYH EDEBALİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)
Pages
85–116
Publication Date
2026-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This summary serves as a detailed reference, assessing digital entrepreneurship as a rapidly evolving field by providing links between studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to examine the development of digital entrepreneurship studies in the literature between 1990 and 2025 through bibliometric analysis methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, 2426 articles obtained from the Scopus database within the specified years, which have a high impact value in the field of digital entrepreneurship and include certain criteria, were analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This summary serves as a detailed reference, assessing digital entrepreneurship as a rapidly evolving field by providing links between studies.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2025 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Dijital Girişimcilik · Bibliyometrik Analiz · LDA

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the development of digital entrepreneurship studies in the literature between 1990 and 2025 through bibliometric analysis methods. For this purpose, 2426 articles obtained from the Scopus database within the specified years, which have a high impact value in the field of digital entrepreneurship and include certain criteria, were analyzed. In this study, VOSviewer was used as a bibliometric mapping tool and LDA (Latent Dirichlet Allocation) as a topic modeling approach. The main contribution of this research to the field is that it addresses a current phenomenon by using distance-based and graph-based mapping tools together. In the study, information on the countries, academic journals and authors with the highest number of publications in the field of digital entrepreneurship was accessed, and articles were analyzed for co-words, citations and co-citations. The findings show that digital entrepreneurship differs from traditional entrepreneurship, especially in the increasing importance of information technologies, reveal the effects of digital twin, digital platform capacity and SMACIT technologies, and provide a summary of digital entrepreneurship research categorized into main themes. This summary serves as a detailed reference, assessing digital entrepreneurship as a rapidly evolving field by providing links between studies.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, dijital girişimcilik çalışmalarının 1990-2025 yılları arasında literatürdeki gelişiminin bibliyometrik analiz yöntemleriyle ele alınmasıdır. Bu amaçla belirlenen yıllar içerisinde Scopus veri tabanından elde edilen, dijital girişimcilik alanında yüksek etki değerine sahip ve belirli kriterleri içeren 2426 makale incelenmiştir. Bu çalışma içerisinde bibliyometrik haritalama aracı olarak VOSviewer ve konu modelleme yaklaşımı olan LDA (Latent Dirichlet Allocation) kullanılmıştır. Bu araştırmanın alana en temel katkısı mesafe tabanlı ve grafik tabanlı haritalama araçlarını birlikte kullanarak güncel bir olguyu ele almasıdır. Çalışmada dijital girişimcilik alanında en çok yayın yapılan ülke, akademik dergi ve yazarlarla ilgili bilgilere erişilmiş, makalelerde eş-kelime, atıf ve ortak atıf analizi yapılmıştır. Bulgular, dijital girişimciliğin geleneksel girişimcilikten özellikle bilgi teknolojilerinin artan önemi noktasında farklılaştığını göstermekte, dijital ikiz, dijital platform kapasitesi ve SMACIT teknolojilerinin etkilerini ortaya koymakta, ana temalara kategorize edilmiş dijital girişimcilik araştırmalarının bir özetini sunmaktadır. Bu özet, çalışmalar arasındaki bağlantıları sunarak hızla gelişen bir alan olan dijital girişimciliği değerlendirerek detaylı bir referans görevi görmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akarsu, O., Çalli, E. N. (2026). Evaluation of Trends in Digital Entrepreneurship with Vosviewer and Topic Modeling Approach. Girişimcilik ve İnovasyon Yönetimi Dergisi, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1, 85–116. https://ajindex.com/articles/1625821

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (28)

  1. Agarwal, P., Swami, S., & Malhotra, S. K. (2024). Artificial intelligence adoption in the post COVID-19 new-normal and role of smart technologies in transforming business: a review. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 15(3), 506-529. https:// doi.org/10.1108/jstpm-08-2021-0122
  2. Alhajri, A., & Aloud, M. (2024). Female digital entrepreneurship: a structured literature review. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 30(2/3), 369- 397. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-09-2022-0790
  3. Abaddi, S. (2024). Digital skills and entrepreneurial intentions for final-year undergraduates: entrepreneurship education as a moderator and entrepreneurial alertness as a mediator. Management & Sustainability: An Arab Review, 3(3), 298-321. https://doi. org/10.1108/msar-06-2023-0028
  4. Aerts, A., & Bogdan-Martin, D. (2021). Leveraging data and AI to deliver on the promise of digital health. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 150, 104456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104456
  5. Agrifoglio, R., Metallo, C., & Di Nauta, P. (2021). Understanding knowledge management in public organizations through the organizational knowing perspective: a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Public Organization Review, 21(1), 137- 156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-020-00480-7
  6. Agyekum, F., Locke, S., & Hewa-Wellalage, N. (2016). Financial inclusion and digital financial services: Empirical evidence from Ghana.
  7. Akarsu, O. (2025). Design and Data-Driven Strategic Management Model Based on Digital Twin. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(4), 89-122. https://doi. org/10.15869/itobiad.1719467
  8. Akarsu O, Bağış M, Kurutkan MN (2025;), “Digital leadership as micro-foundations of digital transformation, technology adaptive capability and financial performance”. Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-12-2024-0792
  9. Antonizzi, J., & Smuts, H. (2020). The characteristics of digital entrepreneurship and digital transformation: A systematic literature review. Paper presented at the Responsible Design, Implementation and Use of Information and Communication Technology: 19th IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on e-Business, e-Services, and e-Society, I3E 2020, Skukuza, South Africa, April 6–8, 2020, Proceedings, Part I 19.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44999-5_20
  10. Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D., & Wright, M. (2018). Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 72-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1266
  11. Audretsch, D. B., Cunningham, J. A., Kuratko, D. F., Lehmann, E. E., & Menter, M. (2019). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: economic, technological, and societal impacts. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 313-325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9690-4
  12. Baskaran, A., Chandran, V. G. R., & Ng, B. K. (2019). Inclusive entrepreneurship, innovation and sustainable growth: Role of business incubators, academia and social enterprises in Asia. Science, Technology and Society, 24(3), 385-400. https://doi. org/10.1177/0971721819873178
  13. Berman, T., Stuckler, D., Schallmo, D., & Kraus, S. (2024). Drivers and success factors of digital entrepreneurship: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Journal of Small Business Management, 62(5), 2453-2481. https://doi.org/10.1080/0 0472778.2023.2238791
  14. Birdthistle, N., Eversole, R., & Walo, M. (2022). Creating an inclusive entrepreneurial ecosystem for women entrepreneurs in a rural region. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 18, e00341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2022.e00341
  15. Bilan, Y., Rubanov, P., Vasylieva, T. A., & Lyeonov, S. (2019). The influence of industry 4.0 on financial services: Determinants of alternative finance development. Polish Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2019.19.1.06
  16. Blei, D., Ng, A., & Jordan, M. (2001). Latent dirichlet allocation. Advances in neural information processing systems, 14. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1120.003.0082
  17. Burtch, G., Carnahan, S., & Greenwood, B. N. (2018). Can you gig it? An empirical examination of the gig economy and entrepreneurial activity. Management Science, 64(12), 5497-5520. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2916
  18. Cukier, W., Gagnon, S., Dalziel, M., Grant, K., Laplume, A., Ozkazanc-Pan, B., & Saba, T. (2022). Women entrepreneurship: towards an inclusive innovation ecosystem. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 34(5), 475-482. https://doi.org/10.1080/0 8276331.2022.2066436
  19. Cristofaro, M., Helfat, C. E., & Teece, D. J. (2025). Adapting, Shaping, Evolving: Refocusing on the Dynamic Capabilities–Environment Nexus. Academy of Management Collections, 4(1), 20-46. https://doi.org/10.5465/amc.2022.0008
  20. D’Angelo, S., Cavallo, A., Ghezzi, A., & Di Lorenzo, F. (2024). Understanding corporate entrepreneurship in the digital age: a review and research agenda. Review of Managerial Science, 18(12), 3719-3774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00730-8
  21. Damásio, M. J., & Bicacro, J. (2017). Entrepreneurship education for film and media arts: How can we teach entrepreneurship to students in the creative disciplines?. Industry and Higher Education, 31(4), 253-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422217713110
  22. Davidsson, P., Recker, J., & von Briel, F. (2020). External enablement of new venture creation: A framework. Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(3), 311–334. https:// doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0163
  23. Davidson, E., & Vaast, E. (2010). Digital entrepreneurship and its sociomaterial enactment. Paper presented at the 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2010.150
  24. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  25. Dubey, R., Bryde, D. J., Dwivedi, Y. K., Graham, G., Foropon, C., & Papadopoulos, T. (2023). Dynamic digital capabilities and supply chain resilience: The role of government effectiveness. International Journal of Production Economics, 258, 108790. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108790
  26. Dua, G. K. (2024). Blockchain and Its Derived Technologies: Shaping the Future Generation of Digital Businesses With a Focus on Decentralized Finance and the Metaverse. In Ethical AI and Data Management Strategies in Marketing (pp. 26-40). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6660-8.ch004
  27. Elia, G., Margherita, A., & Passiante, G. (2020). Digital entrepreneurship ecosystem: How digital technologies and collective intelligence are reshaping the entrepreneurial process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119791. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119791
  28. Far, S. B., Rad, A. I., & Asaar, M. R. (2023). Blockchain and its derived technologies shape the future generation of digital businesses: a focus on decentralized finance and the Metaverse. Data Science and Management, 6(3), 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. dsm.2023.06.002