SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Business and Management Studies: An International Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 5

PAZAR POTANSİYELİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: TÜRK İHRACATÇILARININ POTANSİYEL PAZARLARININ BELİRLENMESİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

ASSESSMENT OF MARKET POTENTIAL: A RESEARCH ON DETERMINING THE POTENTIAL MARKETS OF TURKISH EXPORTERS

Adnan KARA
Pages
2577–2595
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Ayrıca, ülkeler altı kümeye ayrılmış ve potansiyeli yüksek olanlar belirlenmiştir.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bu çalışmada, Türk ihracatçıları için yabancı ülkelerin pazar potansiyelinin incelenmesi amaçlanmaktadır.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Araştırmanın temel amacı, pazar potansiyelinin değerlendirilmesinde kullanılabilecek faktörleri incelemektir.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ayrıca, ülkeler altı kümeye ayrılmış ve potansiyeli yüksek olanlar belirlenmiştir.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, Türk ihracatçıları için yabancı ülkelerin pazar potansiyelinin incelenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Araştırmanın temel amacı, pazar potansiyelinin değerlendirilmesinde kullanılabilecek faktörleri incelemektir. Araştırmada uluslararası pazarların potansiyeli; ticaret kolaylığı, pazar büyümesi, pazar büyüklüğü ve pazar erişilebilirlik faktörleri ile değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, Çin, Almanya, Hindistan, ABD ve Birleşik Krallık, Türk ihracatçı şirketler için en yüksek pazar potansiyeli olan ülkeler olarak sıralanmıştır. Ayrıca, ülkeler altı kümeye ayrılmış ve potansiyeli yüksek olanlar belirlenmiştir.

Özet

In this study, a research conducted on to investigate countries’ market potentials for Turkish exporters. The main purpose of this research is to examine the factors that can be used in assessment of the market potential. In the research, the potential of international markets was evaluated by factors of ease of trade, market growth, market size and market accessibility. As a result of the research, China, Germany, India, USA and United Kingdom have been ranked as the top market potential for Turkish exporter companies. In addition, countries were divided into six clusters and those with the highest potentials were identified.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARA, A. (2019). PAZAR POTANSİYELİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: TÜRK İHRACATÇILARININ POTANSİYEL PAZARLARININ BELİRLENMESİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 5, 2577–2595. https://ajindex.com/articles/162285

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Askegaard, S., & Madsen, T. K. (1998). The local and the global: exploring traits of homogeneity and heterogeneity in European food cultures. International Business Review, 7(6), 549-568.
  2. Buckley, P. J., Clegg, L. J., Cross, A., Liu, X., Voss, H., & Zheng, P. (2010). The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. In Foreign Direct Investment, China and the World Economy (pp. 81-118).
  3. Palgrave Macmillan, London. Cann, O. (2016). What is competitiveness? https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/09/what-is-competitiveness/
  4. Chakrabarti, A. (2001). The determinants of foreign direct investments: Sensitivity analyses of cross‐country regressions. kyklos, 54(1), 89-114.
  5. Çavuşgil, S. T. (1997). Measuring the potential of emerging markets: An indexing approach. Business Horizons, 40(1), 87-92.
  6. Çavuşgil, S. T., Kiyak, T., & Yeniyurt, S. (2004). Complementary approaches to preliminary foreign market opportunity assessment: Country clustering and country ranking. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(7), 607- 617. Davidson, W. H. (1980). The location of foreign direct investment activity: Country characteristics and experience effects. Journal of international business studies, 11(2), 9-22.
  7. Dow, D., & Karunaratna, A. (2006). Developing a multidimensional instrument to measure psychic distance stimuli. Journal of international business studies, 37(5), 578-602.
  8. Gaston-Breton, C., & Martín Martín, O. (2011). International market selection and segmentation: a two-stage model. International Marketing Review, 28(3), 267-290.
  9. Green, R. T., & Allaway, A. W. (1985). Identification of export opportunities: A shift-share approach. Journal of Marketing, 49(1), 83-88.
  10. Helsen, K., Jedidi, K., & DeSarbo, W. S. (1993). A new approach to country segmentation utilizing multinational diffusion patterns. Journal of Marketing, 57(4), 60-71.
  11. Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, leadership, and organization: do American theories apply abroad?. Organizational dynamics, 9(1), 42-63.
  12. Luqmani, M., Yavas, U., & Quraeshi, Z. A. (1994). A convenience-oriented approach to country segmentation: implications for global marketing strategies. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 11(4), 29-40.
  13. Makino, S., Isobe, T., & Chan, C. M. (2004). Does country matter?. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 1027- 1043. Malhotra, S., Sivakumar, K., & Zhu, P. (2009). Distance factors and target market selection: the moderating effect of market potential. International Marketing Review, 26(6), 651-673.
  14. Manrai, L. A.,